Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
    • DX, worth mentioning? I take it that you refer to after ,65 loan is written off clause. I thought that after the problems I had at deferment (/no proof of income satisfied them, and I could not afford an accountant) after they stopped pestering that they had decided that the age related clause  had kicked in. As I said, its time to hit back with SB letter.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax do not answer .... please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6471 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, I need some advice. I had a template for the first letter to the bank which I copied and edited with my own charges amount, which exceed £2000 over the past three years. Halifax then replied and offered to give me £200 back as 'a gesture of goodwill'. I wrote a second letter saying that £200 are not only about 10% of the charges and could they please make me another, more acceptable offer. The deadline I set them was 4 weeks from the date of my letter, which was 7th July (so they should have answered me by 7th August). However, up to today I have not heard from them, but they still carry on charging me the £39 per transaction refused plus the £28 for making me overdrawn by charging me. In the last 2 months this amounted to about £500!!! In fact they even had the cheek to write to me and warn me about 'somebody' using my account unlawfully and making it overdrawn ... when it was them themselves who did it. I also have a bad credit rating because of their charges.

 

What can I do to get at least some of these excessive charges back?? I only earn £800 a month and due to their charges couldnt pay my rent in full the last couple of months and have now been handed my notice of termination of my rental contract.

 

I really am at a dead end, so please, please help. Thanks in advance. Karina

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send them the prelim letter then the LBA and then file on line or go to the county court with N1 form. Claim the charges right up to filing. This would include the past 2 months of charges.

You will still get charges while the process is running so you will need to claim again after all this has finished to get back what they have charged you since claiming. Soes that make sense? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like you have sent the prelim letter already, but you say that you have given them 4 weeks to respond? Did you also send an LBA (letter before action) after 14 days had passed? If not then you need to do this next. You can also 'update' your schedule of charges at this time by including the following to the template LBA

 

Quote:

 

I now calculate that you have taken £xxxxx.

I have enclosed an up-to-date schedule of the charges for which I am claiming. Please now disregard previous schedule, already sent you in my original letters of the dates quoted above, and these have now been updated to the current date.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount (including any further charges you levie against my account before this date), plus interest, plus my costs and without further notice.

 

 

Don't forget to include the updated copy of your charges also.

 

They will most likely continue to try and fob you off or make silly offers, my advice is to stick to your request for a full settlement and file a court claim at the end of the 14 days if they have not agreed.

 

On current form it would seem that all cases are going to the stage of filing claims, but being settled soon after without actually being defended. You must read through the FAQ's and step-by-steps thoroughly though so you know what to expect, and how to respond.

 

Keep an eye on peoples threads who are at a similar stage, and you will see that they almost all follow the same pattern and responses from the bank. That way you will see what their current gameplan is. Anything out of the ordinary happens or you need help, just post.....

 

Cheers and good luck

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...