Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • By not sticking to the deadline which you set you have lost credibility. Your letter of claim becomes one of hundreds of others which they receive and which they put in the bin because they think that you are just bluffing.  
    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ESA appeal allowed


Jason6416
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Backdated payments following tribunals usually take in the region of 2-6 weeks.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I''m with Antone on this one. DWP are sooo wrong here.

 

If someone just has limited capability for work(LCW), they're in the WRAG. If someone has limited capability for work related activity (LCWRA), they're in the Support Group. When regulation 35 applies, the claimant has LCWRA.

 

Jason, tell them to look up paragraph 42353 of the Decision Makers Guide - it's in chapter 42. It states:

 

42353 Claimants with the most severe illnesses or disabilities who have LCWRA will receive the support component without conditionality although they may participate in work-related activity on a voluntary basis if they so wish.

 

You meet this criteria - therefore you should be in the Support Group.

 

Here is a link to that piece of information.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. When you phone, you do not get through to the ESA section. You get through to a call centre. If they still say you are in the WRAG, it is very important that you ask for a call back from an ESA Decision Maker. Stay at your computer when you make the call. Have this page open and read directly from my post.

 

You say: "I called yesterday about my claim because the tribunal have decided in my favour. During the call yesterday I was told that I was placed in the WRAG, but I think that's wrong. Can you check that again for me please?"

 

They will check. If they say you are in the Support Group, ask how much the arrears are that have been issued to you, and write it down. End the call.

 

If they still say you are in the WRAG, you ask for a call back from an ESA decision maker. If they won't do this, tell them that there has been a mistake in the way they have applied the tribunal's decision and you need to speak to a Decision Maker about this. If they still refuse, ask for a Team Leader and repeat.

 

When an ESA Decision Maker calls you back, repeat what you asked above. If they say you are in the WRAG,

 

you say: "My decision notification from the Tribunal states that regulation 35 applies. When regulation 35 applies, the claimant must be placed in the Support Group as they are deemed to have limited capability for work related activity. This is confirmed by paragraph 42353 in chapter 42 of the decision makers guide. Therefore, I should be in the support group, not the WRAG. Could you please take a look for me?"

 

If they still say you are in the WRAG,

 

you say: "Can you tell me if the DWP are appealing against the Trinunals' decision or otherwise disagreeing with it?

If they say yes, ask on what grounds and then write it down. Then thank them for explaining and end the call.

 

If they say no

 

you say: "I am acting upon advice. I will have to go back to the place that advised me to find out what to do next. Thank you."

 

and end the call

 

They don't know it but 'next', unless they have very good reason for refusing to implement the Tribunal's decision, we'll be writing a letter to your MP - I'll help you to do it. If at any stage they question you about regulation 35 or the decision maker's guide, it's perfectly ok to say that you don't know, that you sought advice and were told to put these things to them. You do not have to tell them who advised you - that's your business.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be getting £53.45 personal allowance and £32.35 support component. (The £26.75 is the WRAG component)

 

Did you get an ESA decision maker to call you?

 

Did you say what I said to say in my post? If so, what were their answers that I asked you to write down?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has this changed recently? When I processed ESA, people under 25 who were placed in the WRAG or SG received the same personal allowance as those over 25. That was a while ago, as you know, so I could have outdated information.

 

Jason, they're still wrong and have incorrectly implemented the Tribunal decision. You referred to sanctions - did they say why a sanction has been applied?

 

Oh balls. You are absolutely right, Antone. The £53.45 only applies during the assessment phase for under 25's.

 

My sincered apologies, Jason. Now that you are in the main phase of ESA, you should be getting £67.50 a week personal allowance and £32.35 support component. If you have a sanction on your claim however it could be less.

 

Unfortunately I can't say what to do next because there are still unanswered questions. You really need to speak to a decision maker; the people at the contact centre are not trained, don't have your paperwork and cannot really answer anything beyond what is on the computer screen. When you phoned the second time, did they arrange for a callback tomorrow? If so, and you don't have one by 12pm, phone and ask for an 'escalation'. An escalation is when you have not had a call back when one has been arranged and they will have a manager arrange for someone to call you within the hour. If they haven't arranged for a call back tomorrow, phone the moment the lines open and absolutely insist (be polite but firm) that you get a call back from an ESA decision maker. Tell them you rang twice yesterday, they have applied the tribunal decision incorrectly and you would like it sorted out - only an ESA decision maker can sort it out, the contact centre cannot.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nystagmite, I think there is a premium but I'm not certain about ESA and the premiums though I am aware of them in relation to other benefits. Antone would be the man to ask.

 

Normally as far as I go with ESA is getting the claimant an award, by appeal unfortunately! To that end, my familiarity mainly lies with the legislation concerning entitlement in itself. It took me long enough to learn about the criteria for ESA when it came out and it's only in the last couple of years I've been advising on it. Even now I frequently badger Antone and others when a complex ESA case appears here as I don't have the answers.

 

Jason's case is pretty straightforward in that he doesn't appear to have been placed in the group that the legislation says he's entitled to be placed in. But if there is an additional premium too then we need to be asking about that also, so thanks for bringing it up - and if anyone knows for certain if there is a premium, speak up!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to appeal the group - you have won your appeal and the right along with it to go into the support group. The jobcentre have no more say than the contact centre in your ESA claim - they, like the contact centre can only tell you what they can see on the screen in front of them.

 

As I said before, you need to speak to an ESA Decision Maker. That can only be acheived by getting a call back from the benefit centre, following the process I posted about before. Please call the number on your letters and ask for a call back from an ESA decision maker.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Something is far wrong here. The Tribunal don't say what group you go into - they'll either say regulation 35 applies or it doesn't. It's the regulation that determines the group. If the tribunal states in the claimant's notification letter that regulation 35 applies but they have stated on the DWP copy that it doesn't apply then it's an issue that the tribunal have to sort out, not the DWP as the DWP are supposed to act on the information that they get from the tribunal. I can't give you any advice until I know whether DWP are misunderstanding the tribunals paperwork, or the tribunal have made an error in their paperwork. I need to know what the problem is in order to solve it. That said, I'm very aware of the time contraints involved, and you only have two days left to request a statement of reasons from the tribunal. To that end, I think that you should write to the tribunal service explaining the situation and request a statement of reasons for their decision. There is a template below for you.

 

Your address

Your national insurance number

your case reference number

the date

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Social Entitlement Chamber

Employment and Support Allowance Appeal Tribunal held on 22/12/2011

 

I attended a hearing at (enter tribunal location) on 22/12/2011 in regard to my appeal against a decision to disallow me Employment and Support Allowance. My appeal was successful and I have received my notification which states that regulation 35 of the Employment and Support Allowance regulations applies.

 

However, the Department of Work and Pensions are refusing to implement regulation 35 and informed me during a telephone conversation on 20/01/2012 that their copy of the notification from the tribunal did not contain this information.

 

I would therefore be grateful if you could confirm whether regulation 35 applies in my case, and provide a statement of reasons concerning the decision of the tribunal.

 

yours sincerely

your name.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should send it to the address that is on the letter from the tribunal notifying you of their decision.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...