Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Rbs - ppi claim on credit card - refused


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4568 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I tried to claim PPI that my sister in law has paid on a RBS Mastercard for many years, this type of insurance should never have been sold to heras she has had health issue since teenage years.

 

The reply fro the bank was more or less you ticked the PPI acceptance box so you dont have a claim.

 

SHe never ever got a copy of ths the insurance policy and when we requested a Subject Access request there was no copy of the policy in it. We wrote to them telling them there was no policy but they have not replied.

 

Please can anybody advise what to do know.

 

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi debt

 

Have you had a final answer from RBS?

 

You could send the following letter regarding your SAR request:-

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear xxxxxxxx

 

DSAR Reference: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Account Number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated xxxxxxxxxxx. The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

1) You have failed to provide a Copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement.

2) etc

3) etc

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Fill in the blanks.

 

Don't give up, thats what they want you to do

 

You've still got avenues you can take, courts, FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi debt

 

Have you had a final answer from RBS?

 

You could send the following letter regarding your SAR request:-

 

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Section 7 – Data Protection Act 1998

 

Dear xxxxxxxx

 

DSAR Reference: xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Account Number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated xxxxxxxxxxx. The disclosure of personal data is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

1) You have failed to provide a Copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement.

2) etc

3) etc

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

The time for compliance with my request has now expired. If you do not comply fully with my Subject Access Request within 7 days, I shall apply to the County Court for an order to enforce compliance, together with damages at the discretion of the court.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Fill in the blanks.

 

Don't give up, thats what they want you to do

 

You've still got avenues you can take, courts, FOS.

 

Hi rebel

 

No..they have not giving us a final answer, and yes we have already sent a letter before action telling them they have not complied with SAR, as they did not give her a copy of the insurance policy, they only replied with a short letter stating that they have enclosed all documentation referring to the account as previously in their SAR stating that the original contract appliaction form sent to us shows that the PPI on this account was taken out at the time of application, as per marked PPI option box.

 

However as stated sis in law did not know at that time (many years ago) that pre existing conditions where not covered by PPI. It has been brought to our attention by your site.

 

Should we send another letter stating that yes she may have ticked the option box....but did not know that pre existing conditions were not covered (have already said this in first letter)...

 

ANy ideas on how you would reply to this type of letter.

 

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

So their rejection letter didn't mention it being their final response. In that case you can go back to them.

 

You don't really need the policy and I wouldn't get hung up on that myself.

 

Did you send them a completed fos questionnaire and a spreadsheet of claim (SOC)?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

So their rejection letter didn't mention it being their final response. In that case you can go back to them.

 

You don't really need the policy and I wouldn't get hung up on that myself.

 

Did you send them a completed fos questionnaire and a spreadsheet of claim (SOC)?

 

ims

 

 

Hi ims

 

Your correct, they didn't mention it being their final response.

 

Wanted to check policy as she was self employed at the time she took PPI out as well as having previousa medical conditions.

 

Yes.. we did send completed fos questionaire and a spread sheet.

 

I have today sent them a letter more or less saying this was defo missold due to previous medical conditions and no advice from RBS. Just need to wait now and see what they have to say.

 

They have already paid up PPI on loan she had but cleared arrears with the payment however the loan wasn't a tick boc on an application form which is what they are saying, she ticked the box on the credit card application form many years ago asking for PPI but had no knowledge that it didn;t cover previsous medical conditions.

 

DS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...