Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That would be very helpful I'm sure. And absolutely I would endeavour to get the transcript if my case is successful. Am I right in saying that I should use and quote this case in my mediation?
    • I thought you said that the work had been carried out? Now I look at the letter which apparently has been sent by your partner which suggests that the work has still yet to be done. Please clarify
    • Please note also that Cagger @occysrazor has helped us to apply for the transcript of the judgement which will be available to everybody and will be available to you free of charge if you go to trial. I hope that if you go to trial and you also succeed – as you surely will – that you will help us get the transcript of the judgement in your case.
    • Lolerz is spot on. The limitation period is six months for prosecution in the Magistrates' Court. Six years for bringing a civil claim. I know you'll be thinking "it can't be both" but never underestimate the PPCs' contempt for the law and their utter greed. In this case there is no supermarket chain, etc., so just ignore.
    • So let's see your draft. In terms of what you have to do now, you will be required to mitigate your loss and this means that you should pay the bill and reclaim it. If you start haggling over the bill which eventually may mean that you could incur further costs. For instance, if the courtesy car facility is withdrawn from you then you will be left either without vehicle all you will have to you rent or own. I can even imagine that Mercedes might come back to you and say that if you don't settle the bill they will start levying a storage charge – and you would be unlikely to be able to recover that as well. So I think that you should pay the bill, get your car. Make sure that it is perfectly all right. Has it been given a full check over for any other possible faults? You may as well get the whole thing diagnosed including an MOT to see exactly where you stand. Prepare the draft letter informing them that the work is being carried out – that you had no choice as you were obliged to mitigate your losses – and you want them to settle it.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Council tax debt and bank account arrestment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I am new here, I had a look at the forum to see if I could find an answer to my problem, but not everything was covered.

I have some debt for the 2009 and 2010.

I had an arrangement with Scott & Co for a payment by direct debit, but since august, I haven't been able to make a payment.

We received a letter dated 23 of november saying that our arrangement was cancelled and enforcement action will be taken, but no delay to do anything is stated on that letter.

On the 6th of december, someone came to our houseand a charge for payment was given to us.

I have been trying to phone them few times without luck, so yesterday I made a payment of £5 online in the hope to allow us more time in case it took longer to get hold of them.

Today, I received a letter from my partner's bank saying that an arrestment has been taken on his account on the 2nd of december.

We are both self employed, the only money we have is my partner's salary from his business and mostly live with benefits, we also have 2 kids under 5.

They couldn't take anything on my account as I have an overdraft and the only money that goes in it iare child benefit and tax credit, and almost half of the money that goes onto my partneer's account are working tax credit and housing benefit.

I am the one dealing with that,as we split the expense over our accounts, so he is not really aware of the arrears we have....

They took £255 on his account, and the debt is £1328 ( but on the charge for payment £1186which I assume is due to the arrestment.)

 

So today, I finally emailed them , after reading someone here who was succesfull in doing that, offering a monthly payment of £140 from the 21st of december, which is the most we can afford if we still want to pay a decent amount for this year council tax. I also asked to have a reply within 7 days and to release the amount taken from the account.

After reading a bit, I think they won't let us have that money back.

So, few questions here: Should I fill a Time To Pay in the meantime ( I have had a look, but don't understand it all)

I have seen that they can't arrest money on an account with benefits, does housing benefits counts? Or will they just take the money from the money he earn, despite benefits on his account?

Do we have any chance to have the arrestment money back?

Does the arrestment be on all the money that goes into this acount or is it just a one time order so any money that goes after is still available for us?

 

Thanks a lot for your help. I am hoping to sort this out ASAP, so I won't have to stress my partner with that as he is already quite stressed, between work and we are having one of our kid with a possibility to have "special needs"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

There's info on the Govan Law Centres site regarding the Sheriff Officers arresting an account which Benefits are paid into, they cannot hold the arrestment if there was benefits of any kind invloved in the account.

 

http://www.govanlc.com/benefits_&_bankarrestment.htm

 

I take it they have gone for the arrestment due to the fact your both self-employed, bank arrestment isn't a very effective form of diligence (debt collection) so it's not a prefered method.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. Noone got back to me yet from the email I sent yesterday, so will post th Time to pay and enclosed a copy of the email i sent.

I will see with my partner for a copy of his bank account, as I assume it has to be a recent one. Do you know how long they take to release the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am assuming that the account that was frozen did have other monies not earned from benefits so it will be unlikely that this will be given back - You have to get the time to pay order into your local court within 14 days of it being served. Somethin is not adding up thought - they cannot aply a bank account aarrestment til the charge for payment has elsapsed - is there a different charge for payment already been received?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was one in august, I then phoned them to arrange for a direct debit, but from september we had some financial difficulties, meaning the direct debit was just bounced back from not enough funding on the account.

I tried to contact them few times since beginning of november without luck, and we received a letter on the 23/11/2011 saying they have been instructed to commence enforcement. Finishing witha " please contact us now for assistance", with the same 0131 number on it. The thing that doesn't seem right to me is that there is no delay on that letter.

I did put a copy of that letter with the Time to pay I sent today, first class recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That now makes sense. So the bank arrestment then is connected to the first account and they are trying to enforce action on a second account.

 

You would have to acknowlegde the 2 accounts so they can then be paid consecutively.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I had a thought over night, and remembered that the last time my partner put some money on his account was beginning of october, so since then, only benefits were paid onto the account, so they did take benefits money. Our rent was taken twice since he put the money, and the money he put wouldn't cover fully the rent.

 

I am just trying to find a solution, and would be very happy to tell scott & co they have done something wrong!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They took £255 on his account, and the debt is £1328 ( but on the charge for payment £1186which I assume is due to the arrestment.)

 

 

 

That money will still be in your account as the amount they were looking for was not, we had an account arrested a while ago where there was not enough money in the account to pay the arrestment total due, we received a letter from the bank 5 years later saying they had now made it available to withdraw.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Froggies,

 

It seems we both have the same problem. I was behind with my council tax as well from years of battling mental health issues after leaving the army it was not something i had time to get on top of as i lost so many jobs. then i managed to get back on my feet and save up a decent amount of money! i got a visit from the sherrif officers to my house and they gave me a letter telling me that i was £1340.87 over due from the previous years so i decided to set up a payment to get on top of it. just this firday past there was an arrestment from my account and they took out £3200 which was my army pension, my wages, my benefits, and my wifes benefits. now we have zero money for the Christmas period and not really sure how to deal with it! It would be good to see how we can both work together and find a solution. i just read that they are not allowed to take money out of an account with benefits payed into it?

 

Am i correct in thinking that they are not allowed to emtpy an entire account? seems un fair and un lawful!

 

Thanks

Edited by bdbdbd
Link to post
Share on other sites

That money will still be in your account as the amount they were looking for was not, we had an account arrested a while ago where there was not enough money in the account to pay the arrestment total due, we received a letter from the bank 5 years later saying they had now made it available to withdraw.

Are you sure about that? I thought they could take any amount of money, even if it was less than the amount due. That would be great though!

 

Hi Froggies,

 

It seems we both have the same problem. I was behind with my council tax as well from years of battling mental health issues after leaving the army it was not something i had time to get on top of as i lost so many jobs. then i managed to get back on my feet and save up a decent amount of money! i got a visit from the sherrif officers to my house and they gave me a letter telling me that i was £1340.87 over due from the previous years so i decided to set up a payment to get on top of it. just this firday past there was an arrestment from my account and they took out £3200 which was my army pension, my wages, my benefits, and my wifes benefits. now we have zero money for the Christmas period and not really sure how to deal with it! It would be good to see how we can both work together and find a solution. i just read that they are not allowed to take money out of an account with benefits payed into it?

 

Am i correct in thinking that they are not allowed to emtpy an entire account? seems un fair and un lawful!

 

Thanks

There is something I don't understand, how could they arrest your account if you had an arrangement to repay already in place? Normally, they are not allowed to take benefits money, but they can take from your wages. Have you contacted your CAB for advice or the debt collector to see with them? Let me know if you find a way to sort your problem.

 

I have received a letter from Scott & co today, dated 9th/12/2011 for one of the debt on this account, as there were 3 different accounts that were put together a while ago. They put a different account number, the balance due is £304.65 ( which is included in the total of £1328.75) saying:

"We have recently executed a funds arrestment in respect of the debts detailed above. This means that you may not have access to funds held in your bank account or due to you by a third party. It is essential that you contact us immediatly on the above number to prevent further action proceeding against you to obtain release of any arrestment funds to our client."

Are they allowed to split account liker that?? The strange thing is that the letter I received on the 23/11 the prop. dets is our previous address( part of teh debt is from this place) but on the charge for payment, they only used our current address, with the same account number.

Is it me or is Scott & Co just rubbish at following their case?

 

I emailed them thursday 8th, I am still awaiting a reply from them, I made a £5 payment on their website and also offered a DD through their site, and no reply, but they send a letter asking to contact them...dated from the day after I emailed. The Sheriff Clerk should have the letter anytime soon now, but I really would like to know how scott&co manage their account, as it just sound like a lot of rubbish.

By the way, checked my partner's account today, tax credit has been paid and we can still use the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...