Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
    • I am heading over to hers tomorrow so I will find out.  Will there be something written in the agreement or does it depend on the agreement its self ? Just so I know what to look for, so I can provide as much information as possible on here. 
    • The answer to this is going to depend on what the agreement your friend signed says. Or contact the housing provider and ask them.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

aktiv kapital - default notices


mcvey123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6333 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I have been wrangling for some time with these people.

 

So far, they have informed me that they are unable to provide me with either a copy of the original agreements or default notices as the original creditor (First National Tricity Finance) have been unable to supply it to them.

 

I gave them 28 days to remove the 2 default notices from my file and yesterday received a letter saying that they can't do that but since I have made payments to them, then this is a type of admission of liability on my part (which apparently wouldn't stand up in court) and offered to reduce this so-called debt from £450 to £200.

 

I have contacted the credit file companies but they have just fobbed me off with the information commissioner details.

 

What should I do next - contact the info commissioner or do I need to fight them in court?

 

I would be really happy to get rid of them once and for all and so am happy to fight them all the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to the information commissioner outlining what has happened. Do so briefly offering full details and copies of correspondence etc later. Ask the IC to take action to remove the defaults.

 

Write to the OFT to report this compnay for failing to comply with the law. Don't expect them to do anything though.

 

You don't have to write to aktiv and you should be aware that failure to comply with the request means any action they take is unenforceable. Some would say no details = no debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Further to writing to the information commissioner, and sending them all the documentation regarding these problems, I received 3 telephone calls from aktiv within 72 hours where I refused to speak to them on the first 2 occassions. On the third occassion, the customer advisor duped me into talking to her by stating that she was trying to solve the problem. However 30 seconds in to the call she was trying to get me to admit to guilt and seriously interrogating me about the account (highly unfair as she called me on my mobile and I didn't have information to hand and she obviously had my account on the screen in front of her) She proceeded to tell me that the information commissioner wouldn't take my claim seriously and what the outcome would be, etc etc.

 

I got a bit annoyed as I know I have already paid these debts and they are still sitting on my file as Aktiv had "bought them over" and are chasing me for them. However, since they are unable to provide me with a copy of the original agreement (requested in July) along with the default notice, I believe that the debt is unenforceable. I posted a copy of the letter where they admit that neither they or first national are able to provide these to the info commissioner so I feel like I am in the right. I terminated the call as the girl became quite cheeky and I wasn't getting anywhere with it - or rather, she wasn't able to trick me into anything. She was trying to say that since I had agreed a minimum payment with them, that was an admission of liability - no, I said that was a response to your continual harrassment!

 

Since this call i received a letter from the info. commissioner which gave my case a number. So I wrote back to them detailing the telephone conversation. I also wrote to aktiv a letter of complaint about it and a request (again) that they only contact me via letter format.

 

Does anyone know how long it takes the info commissioner to sort it out?

 

I also had written to equifax asking for them to remove the default notices as Aktiv had been unable to supply me with a copy of the default notice and original agreement but they refused to saying that they contacted them and Aktiv confirmed that I defaulted with first national, and basically they took their word over mine without a copy of either documents!

 

Aktiv are extremely hard to sort out - has anyone had any luck?

 

Should I take them to court for harrassment???

 

I would really appreciate any help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The information commissioner has come back to say that they believe that I was in default with the original credit supplier i.e. first national, and that they refuse to remove the default notice despite the fact that no one has been able to supply a copy of it or the original agreement taken at the time.

 

The only other option is to pursue first national and ask them to supply a copy of the original agreement and a copy of the default notices and see how that pans out. failing this, I shall take aktiv kapital to court and at least the judge will see that I have pursued all options.

 

Any advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...