Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Please can you help old kays debt - not mine!!


pinkd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I use to be an agent for kays catalogue and one of my customers got some items which were all sent to her address and she signed for the items.

 

The person moved out the town and she had also written to Kays herself with her new address and requested to pay kays direct.

 

Kays requested her to send the following identification (Untility Bill & Tenancy Agreement) which she did so.

 

Kays replied back to her with a credit agreement form, the document needed to be signed which she did. ( I have a photocopy for my proof) and it was sent back to Kays.

 

3 Years later I am now getting letters of Lowell Financial demanding I pay for her items.

 

I've not got the person contact details so I cannot ask her what is happening.

(Please can you advise as I've sent copies of my evidence to Lowell and there still say I have to pay for her debt,

even no none of the items came to me and I didnt sign for anything).

Link to post
Share on other sites

if nothing shows on your CRA file

 

IGNORE THEM!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha, lowlifes farcical have been on the sauce by the sounds of it! How extremely delusional. Ignore them and file complaints with the OFT&TS via consumer direct. There is absolutely nothing that they can do, and if they have been zealously adding incorrect adverse data on your credit file, then you should take them to court and sue them for defamation.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

experian.co.uk

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

bazooka boo,

i no you said just ignore them and file a ccomplaint with the OFT&TS via consumer direct.

what is OFT?&TS?

also lowell are now trying to say that kays were unable to validate the claim as customer did not contact them as requested,which i no is not true as the place were i got the photocopy off the credit agreement form done outside was a post box and it got posted,

so this is not my fault that kays staff are not doing there jobs properly.

lowell keep sending me letters asking me for payment also saying that they will look up to see if i have a mortage and if i have other commitments and paying them on time also if i'm working so they can either take me to court,or send someone face to face.

i have never been in this situation ever before and its making me really ill.

please can you help!!!

pinkd

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, please do try and relax, you won't think straight or logically if you begin believing what these imbeciles say.

 

OFT&TS is Office of Fair Trading & Trading Standards, you can contact consumer direct and they will automatically pass this onto both of them for you.

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Dl1/Directories/UsefulContactsByCategory/Governmentcitizensandrightscontacts/DG_195948

 

Now the letters you receive from Lowlifes are simply computer generated garbage sent out by the hundreds and thousands on a weekly basis, the purpose of these "official warnings" and threats of "imminent legal action" is psychological rather than actual, once this is realised the letters cease to have any effect or credibility.

 

The ONLY human input these missives have had, is that of your postie pushing it through your letter box, they go on a cycle of empty threats, each a little more threatening and misleading than the one before, when you fail to reply to them, which is exactly what you should do, and they have exhausted their list of threat letters, then they will either flog it on to another circus outfit, or the cycle will start again.

 

What Lowlifes fail to mention is that they in fact have no legal powers to do anything except send you misleading letters full of untruths and verging on the psychologically harassing.

 

If anything were to happen then Kays would have done it before now, and certainly they would not have entertained using Lowlifes, the laughing stock of their corrupt industry.

 

Ignore them, there is absolutely NOTHING they can do, YOU have all of the legal rights here, not them. YOU have the legal right to say who you speak to on your property, YOU have the legal right to ignore anyone knocking on your door, and there is NO law which says that you have to reply to any letters that land on your doormat.

 

Lodge that formal complaint with consumer direct. And get onto Kays and exhaust their complaints procedure as well.

 

Remember NO phone calls, keep a diary of events and file all letters they send you under ignore.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please ignore lowlife

 

they have no powers to do anything!!

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS!

 

get that CRA file!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...