Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Please help I have been commiting tax credit fraud


vinnie1980
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there. I think you should just ring and get this over with. You can't feel any worse than you do, and you might feel a bit better afterwards. As someone already said, you will look better if you don't just wait for them.

 

I think the compliance people are the ones to go for, because they will have your file. Have their letter in front of you so you can quote the reference.

 

Then come back and tell us how you got on. Good luck,

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. Well, you only have the rest of this afternoon to decide and then I guess things will take their course. You've had a lot of advice here, has it helped at all?

 

Fwiw, I personally wouldn't lie and I wouldn't expect them not to uncover more if they start digging. If it were me, I'd try to gain some sort of credibility by co-operating.

 

My best, HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

In case it helps, here is what the HMRC website says about investigations. It does mention a possible reduction in any penalty for co-operating.

 

My best, HB

 

Types of fraud investigations

 

When the Tax Credit Office discovers a case of fraud they can:

 

  • charge a financial penalty
  • prosecute

There are two types of investigation they can use to deal with tax credit fraud:

 

  • civil investigations
  • criminal investigations

Civil investigations

 

The aim of a civil investigation is to get back any tax credits payments that have been falsely claimed through fraud, along with any interest. The Tax Credit Office will also charge a financial penalty. A civil investigation does not prosecute.

The Tax Credit Office will offer a person the chance to co-operate with them and tell them all the facts. This is known as making a full disclosure. To encourage someone to co-operate with them, they’ll consider lowering their penalty. The amount they’ll lower it by depends on why the penalty's being charged:

 

  • if it's for giving wrong information they’ll reduce it by up to 50 per cent
  • if it's for not telling them about a change in circumstances, the amount they’ll reduce it by depends on if it's the first time it's happened and the amounts involved

When the Tax Credit Office is sure the person responsible has told them all the facts about the fraud, they’ll work out how much the person has to pay.

Tax credit penalties

Criminal investigations

 

The Tax Credit Office tries to deal with tax credit fraud using civil investigations whenever possible. They’ll only use criminal investigations in very serious cases where:

 

  • they want to send a strong message to stop other people from trying the same thing
  • the person has acted in a way that makes a criminal investigation the only option

Serious cases include:

 

  • organised tax credit fraud
  • where false statements have been made
  • where fake documents have been given to the Tax Credit Office
  • where people claiming tax credit have hidden information from the Tax Credit Office or misled them on purpose
  • where someone's carried out the same type of offence before
  • where there's proof that Tax Credit Office staff have been assaulted or threatened
  • where people have pretended to be their employees

More useful links

 

Learn more about reporting benefit theft on the Directgov website

 

More about crime, justice and the law on the Directgov website

HM Revenue & Customs criminal investigation policy

Top

 

 

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4310 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...