Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Decree against me not notified


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

Just wondering if anyone can give me a bit of advice. I have just received a letter from The registry Trust informing me that there is a decree against me at the local sheriff court. I did not receive any court paper and called the court to find out why. They told me that I was sent papers by recorded delivery and as there was nothing back to say that the delivery was not successful that they have acted properly. I checked the code that thy gave me on the Post Office track and trace which says that the post office have still to deliver the letter to me. As a result of this I have not had the opportunity to offer payment and my case has went down as undefended. I don't know where I stand with this can anyone help.

 

Thanks in advance

Hope

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you get written proof of this? does it state this online?

 

you can recall the decree if so as bluedog says using this form

 

http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/sheriff/small_claims/forms/Form20.doc

 

but as above can you defend this action or pay it in full within 28 days?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Thanks for responding:-)I spoke to CAB and they told me unless I could pay the debt in full ( which I can't) I have nothing to defend so the court would recall the original decree but I would get another only marked time to pay. Credit kn******* now so will just live with it. I have applied for a DAS so hopefully this should work for me just hoping that this creditor agrees fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

You can get this recalled so far as not implemented no problem what so ever. The sheriff would then recall it and remove the registration against you setting a date for the hearing to commence again.

 

You can ask for it to be recalled if you can prove you did not recieve the summons and in this case the track and trace is saying that its still to be delivered. Put in a "minute for recall of decree" - the forms are at http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk

 

You will need to list the reason you are seeking recall (non reciept) and also your proposed defence to the original summons and turn up on the date specified by the court. This is all providing that you do actually have a good reason for not paying it i.e. the amount was in dispute etc etc

 

One thing I would ask you, have they executed it? i.e. have they sent the sheriff officer after the money or garnished your wages/ income?

 

If they havent then you could actually pay it off and then ask for it to be recalled (thats what I did) because I believe the time limit on a recall is 14 days after the date of execution of the decree. If it hasnt been executed then you should still be able to have it recalled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...