Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Parking ticket on a disabled hire car


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4440 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry too much about threats from Trethowans. They have just been to court twice on NHS invoices and been slapped down. It may be awhile before they try again.

 

Was the car hire arranged through motorbility? If it was phone them and ask them to have a word with the hire company. If they get a lot of business off motorbility it may sway them!

 

I notice your in Liverpool, and your Dad has a heart condition was this Broadgreen?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well it was actually Aintree Hospital [faz] were Trethowans lost the case in Liverpool county court last week. So I don't think they will be rushing back.

I actually think they shoot themselves in the foot with the double yellow lines. Being in the Hospital they have no meaning anyway. However anyone with a BB can park on double yellow lines, as long as there are no other regulations. So it could be argued that the yellow lines are confusing.

 

I have an appointment in Broadgreen later, unfortunately I will have to add to Vincis coffers to park there. Trying to get a BB space by the Alexandra wing is near impossible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So Trethowans are saying they have won a NPO against the hire company, and they have your details?

 

If they have applied for an NPO and won that would have cost them a lot! If they have gone this far they are either bluffing or the next move could be a claim against you!! However given Aintree,s history in defended cases and their flawed contract, it would be a day out and a win for you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Wait for the summons to arrive if it does, then ask for help with moving it to your local court and defending it. I think they are on more of a sticky wicket then normal here. If the road is marked up with double yellow lines they are impersonating road markings, with a Blue badge you can park on DYL's so the markings could be shown to make the driver believe they could park on them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have FOI'd Aintree asking for a copy of their "parking Regulations". However they do seem to believe they can issue "fixed penalty notices".

 

 

http://www.aintreehospitals.nhs.uk/Library/pdf_files/FT_Governors_Jan_07/FixedPenaltyNotices.pdf

 

Also the young lady who filed the claim form has a specialist area!

 

 

SPECIALIST AREA

 

Enforcement of Penalty Charge Notices (Car Parking)

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Not 100% sure but I think at this point just the reason for the set aside which is that you were never served the claim, and were not allowed to enter a defence. Hopefully someone can confirm.

Just write down the events regarding the receipt of the judgement as they happened,and explain it to the judge.

 

1 Solicitors claimed against hire company.

2 Won judgement.[Default/defended]

3 Hire company then set aside and gave your name.

4 Solicitors then reclaimed without you knowing and obtained a default judgement.

 

Once the set aside has been done its goes back too the start. However it may be worth taking along a brief outline of your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They are acting for Aintree and are denying they are fixed penalties.

 

Have a look at this!

 

http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?act=attach&type=post&id=9867

 

Mainly this sentence. "It facilitates a penalty being applied to motorists who transgress our parking rules"

Edited by esmerobbo
Link to post
Share on other sites

In your case its different as you never entered a car park where the signs are that they are relying on, what is there to say what any parking restrictions there are between where you drove in to where you parked?

Then the argument is you parked on DYL which they chose to paint on the road. It is common knowledge that a Blue badge holder can park on a DYL if there is no other restrictions in force. Then you have the point of the security man telling you to park where you did. Them asking you to prove which security man told you to park is ridiculous how would your dad know his name?

 

I would be interested to know how they know disabled bays were available. Having been there 100s of times myself and having a blue badge I have never found one empty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never noticed any signs before the ticket but there are some as you drive in past the taxi rank- how the hell you're supposed to read them whilst driving and having 10 cars up your bum I don't know. Gonna drop my mum off on Wednesday armed with my camera!! :-)

 

Watch where you park!!!!:jaw:

 

The first sign I don't know if you have seen it is as you drive in from Lower lane is set back about 10 metres back from the road and 6 metres up a lamp post on the right. Get a picture of them so we can see what they actually offer or warn!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Sailor Sam the local paper aren't interested as somebody else has already informed them of what's going on and they don't want to know :-(

 

Indeed local paper and local radio have chosen to ignore this disgraceful waste of money by the hospital trust. £120,000 odd paid to their solicitors in the last two years! I was thinking of parking up at the hospital and putting the reg number of a well known local radio phone in presenter, or the news editor of the local paper on my car!

See if getting an invoice would wake them up to this operation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...