Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclays Current Account 'upgrade' mis-selling


Springboard
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4738 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't know if anyone has encountered this problem? I have banked withBarclays for over 30 years; I have several deposit accounts and a current account with an unsecured overdraft facility of 4k and certain other benefits that I found useful including RAC membership. I paid a small fee for this account but it was worth it.

 

In January I received a call from Barclays suggesting that I would savemoney if I switched to another product, I would receive a 1k interest free overdraft plus other benefits (that I would use) for a small fee. I agreed butwhen I received the paperwork I realised that the account would cost more asthe interest on the overdraft over 1k was 8% higher than my previous rate, thiswas never mentioned in the initial call.

 

I called the bank and said that I wanted to revert back to my previous account as there would be no saving to me and was told that the 'product' nolonger existed and that they had other schemes that where similar but notexactly the same.

 

My account was changed back but again, upon checking the interest it is now5% higher than my initial rate and I have been told this is the best they cando.

 

My question here is - despite running through a very long Q&A whereby the advisor 'matched' my needs to the product at no time wasthe rate of interest mentioned nor was I told there would be an increase.

 

None of the calls from Barclays touched on the rate of interest, I thought this was illegal? Does any one know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays are infamous for doing this. In fact a 'whistle-blower' program on BBC showed how Barclays staff would switch peoples account WITHOUT asking, if they thought they could get away with it. A handy little bonus for them @£20-£50 a time.

 

I suggest you go into your branch and rise hell with them, threaten them with a report to OFT and FOS if your old account is not reinstated, and do so if they don't. IMHO this is miss-selling

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Springboard,

 

Follow Lex's suggestions and if you get no joy in-branch, tell them you'll make a formal complaint to HQ.

 

Then, if necessary, complain in writing to Barclays London HQ setting out briefly what happened and why you're unhappy.

 

Give them 14 days to resolve your complaint, failing which you report the matter to the FOS and other relevant authorities.

 

If you have been left in a worse position than you were originally, then it's reasonable to ask that they restore the facilities that were previously available to you.

 

:wink:

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks LexWill do - it's just so annoying as it's 'time' and I have quite a few battles going on at the moment. Would this come under the 'mis selling' banner?Will post the outcome. Best

Barclays are infamous for doing this. In fact a 'whistle-blower' program on BBC showed how Barclays staff would switch peoples account WITHOUT asking, if they thought they could get away with it. A handy little bonus for them @£20-£50 a time.

 

I suggest you go into your branch and rise hell with them, threaten them with a report to OFT and FOS if your old account is not reinstated, and do so if they don't. IMHO this is miss-selling

 

Lex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you SlickWill do, especially using the phrase 'being left in a worse off position' Awful thing is this is what I consider sharp practice more akin to loan shark rather than the bank I've been loyal to for 30 years! Will post the outcome. Thanks again.

Hi Springboard,

 

Follow Lex's suggestions and if you get no joy in-branch, tell them you'll make a formal complaint to HQ.

 

Then, if necessary, complain in writing to Barclays London HQ setting out briefly what happened and why you're unhappy.

 

Give them 14 days to resolve your complaint, failing which you report the matter to the FOS and other relevant authorities.

 

If you have been left in a worse position than you were originally, then it's reasonable to ask that they restore the facilities that were previously available to you.

 

:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you SlickWill do, especially using the phrase 'being left in a worse off position' Awful thing is this is what I consider sharp practice more akin to loan shark rather than the bank I've been loyal to for 30 years! Will post the outcome. Thanks again.

 

I'm afraid the loyalty between banks and customers got left by the wayside many years back. I reckon it was around 2000 when I realised that my excellent relationship with business managers no longer mattered or counted for anything. They has little or no discretion and all the decisions were being made by HQ and/or computers.

 

:sad:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...