Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hfo turnbulls court proceeding pls help!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Wunder

 

Are you able to scan and post up any of the documents any of the documents with personal details removed? Particularly need to see the POC and possibly the defence you sent. Also the Statement that you received.

 

How did you receive the statement? Did Turnbulls send it and was it in response to your CPR request? Did you ask for the Credit agreement in your CPR request?

 

When did you submit the defence?

 

Is the Court Northampton? Give them another ring and find out exactly what is happening and what you need to do next, they are normally very helpful.

 

Also, what previous contact have you had with HFO and roughly how much is this claim for?

 

Sorry for all the questions but important.

 

I think the main thing to do is to get information from Barclaycard. You can use the SAR template below with a £10 postal order. Once you have sent the SAR, you can ring them again and try and get more information. You can certainly send a CCA request to Turnbull also.

Standard SAR.doc

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 403
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

TR have 28 days to respond to your defence. Apparently, they always apply for 'Summary judgement' on all claims, the court told me this. if you have submitted a defence, the court should knock this back and tell them to respond to the defence

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I need to re-read the whole of this before I can comment. They would have to apply to have the 'stay' lifted i believe so do not know really what they are talking about.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you are wise to just wait and see what they do next. They seem to have made a right mess of it IMO! See if you can get written confirmation from the court that the case is 'stayed'

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

That whole piece of correspondence from TR is very odd indeed, definitely needs some complaints. Give them enough rope etc...

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am aware of a recent case where the claim was 'stayed' and the defendant was told by Northampton that TR had applied for Summary Judgement after the 'stay' but were told to blow.According to them 'claimants often do this'. This has been reported to OFT so suggest that you do the same, urgently, also contact the court again and find out if TR have applied. The court do not routinely write out to inform people of a 'stay' but BA is right, people have managed to get email confirmation.

  • Confused 1

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks, I'll check with court tomorrow. I'll lodge s complaint with OFT. Would it be for TR or HFO? Am I able to complain against TR to the Law Society for threatening me with sj when the claim is stayed? Should I write to TR or let OFT deal with it?

 

Complain to OFT about TR AND HFO Group of Companies, they are one and the same. You can also complain to Solicitors Reg Authority but OFT are probably a better bet at the moment. Do not write to TR just at the moment, have you posted up the docs they sent you? Need to look at that agreement etc

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the agreement legible and do the Tand Cs look like they belong to it? If you can scan them with any person details covered or use MS 'Paint' program to 'hide' the personal details once scanned and then convert the file to PDF or save it to a zip file, you can then upload using the 'go advanced' button and 'manage attachments' option

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send em this!

 

Thank you for letter dated xx

 

In my letter of xxx I made a request for a copy of the executed credit agreement for the above mentioned account under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 78. The document provided does not comply with the requirements of section 78 because

 

1 The document is not easily legible as required by Regulation 2 Consumer

Credit Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents Regulations 1983

 

2 No copy of relevant Terms and Conditions was received

 

3 No statement of account was received.

 

I am granting to you a further 21 days to produce a copy of an executable agreement. After that I will consider that the above account is closed and that you will no longer pursue the alleged debt.

 

After this period you should close the file and cease processing an personal data relating to me on this matter.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can adapt the letter to suit and include the other stuff. It is worth responding to TR at some point as it shows them that you are prepared to defend this and you can include your response in the OFT complaint but up to you

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully the evidence that OFT are compiling will stop HFO/TR trading, then they will have to stop harassing you - that is why the complaints are so important. I would write to TR and inform them that you acknowledge no debt to their client, you consider that their claim is still in dispute as they have not properly complied with your s78 and CPR requests, you have reported their threatening behaviour to OFT and any future legal claims will be rigorously defended.Short and sweet.If the account is in dispute, they are breaking OFT guidelines by continued harassment

 

Document everything that has happened and send to OFT with copies of correspondence.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just keep informing the court and OFT, afraid it is a matter of seeing what they do next but all this can be used in defence. They are still in default regarding your CPR and s78 requests, think they are covering their backs a bit here!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could submit a fresh claim though after a strike out could they not? Would it not be better to have it stayed so they could not submit a claim?

 

wrong way round I think! You have a mail to say claim is 'stayed'? They have to apply for this to be lifted

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...