Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capquest and HFC - HFC asking for CCA FEE again


chrisdring
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4764 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

I am new to the site and wanted some help.

 

last november i recieved a letter from capquest, after reading some info on here and other sites - I sent them a CCA request and the fee with a postal order and never signed any of the letters,

 

 

in december i had 3 letters from them, they wrote to say that they were no longer dealing with the account and sent back the postal order and said any information should be reffered back to HFC.

 

april this year i started to get the same letters from HFC saying they had tried to contact me several times without sucess, and that they wanted this matter sorted out.

 

i ignored all the letters until i got the last one, saying that they were issuing me with defult notice and i had to reply within a certain timescale.

 

I broke and replied with the copy of the letter i had sent to capquest and the fact that they had returned my fee and said tnat they could not process anything without a signature,

HFC replied and asked me to reply again with the £1 fee and a proof of idenity? surely this is way to late as the account went into dispute back in december and they capquest said they needed a signature to process.

they even said that HFC had said they needed a signature to process the information.

 

So why are HFC still persuing this?

 

as another note,

 

they have added the information to my credit file, before contacting me as it wasn't on my file in Decemeber,

but weirdly appearred a week before the HFC letter came.

 

Plus they said they might not hold information on the account if it is over 6 years old,

and i think it was taken out in 2004,

althouigh i cant rememeber when i stopped paying on it,

as i requested the remaining amount years ago when i could pay it back

and they never came back to me,

 

i forgot about it- till now

 

lol am sure also that the amount is not right,

could they have added more onto to amount really owed????

 

i know lots of info,

but need to know if i should send another CCA request to HFC

when capquest said they needed my signature?

 

any advice would be really helpful. xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I would send a SAR to HFC. Will cost you £10 but may be worth it. That way you will get all information they hold on you.

 

I bet there's loads of charges on the account which can be claimed back. Also, were you paying ppi on the account?

 

Be aware though that HFC shredded loads of stuff in the past to try and wriggle out of their ppi mis-selling obligations. They have been fined £1.8 million.

 

dx100uk will comment on this thread....his life's ambition is to get HFC eh dx?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who me.....:lol:

 

who told you that...dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the quick repsonse, wanted to know why HFC are asking for the CCA fee again, when capquest already said that they couldn't process my request back in December. it was as though they were trying to find me and then passed the account back to HFC, although they said in their letter that HFC required a signature, so they must have sent my request to HFC in december???i dont get it??? do i need to sent them the CCA fee again or just a SAR, i will only be sending them a postal order anywyay, i know they can scan your signature??tks

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks i will, has anyone ever got back info from requesting a SAR? and like you say if they have sreadded lots of stuff what can they produce to make me pay back to them? is anything inforcable without a CCA???

Link to post
Share on other sites

something is not right here with the story.........

 

 

either its within 6yrs and they do hold the paperwork or its outside 6yrs?

 

if its live on your CRA file, then they still have it [or should!]

 

tell us a wee bit more about dates and sums quoted

 

as it might not be worth while pulling their string at all.

 

if they have no CCA then they prob wont go near court

if they do have the CCA then charges reclaiming /ppi might be an option.

 

figures please...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am waiting for my HFC SAR as we speak.

 

Forget the CCA request.....SAR covers everything.

 

Again...Forget the CCA.

 

Get the SAR off and see what comes back.

 

You will still be able to claim a load of stuff back.....don't panic Mr Mainwaring

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i want to know if they can inforce anythig and that if they can't then they should go away and stop sending me letters, also since theyhave asked me for another payment and proof of identity should i do that? as thats all they have asked for ? and also why didnt they say they had the cca in the first place.? or in fact are they lying>? doesnt make sense. and is there a timescale to me replying? is doesnt' say on their letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ok...I would not be going down the road of unenforceable. You agree that you had this account and that there is a small liability on it.

 

If it were me, and knowing there are going to be charges on the account which you can reclaim, I would be looking at going down that route so you can have these set against any balance and maybe even clear it. That would solve the issue.

 

Personally I doubt HFC will have the original agreement but a reconstructed one would be good enough.

 

I would also only deal with HFC and no dca.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i see from your other thread you haven't got your SAR back? when is their time up for you>?when you say a reconstructed one is good enough? does that mean they can send me anything?? and not the original one as the CCA request asks for? seems pointless to ask for a CCA if this means nothing? confused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My SAR is due back in the next week or so.

 

There are more cases now where Judges view a properly reconstructed agreement as being valid. Have a look around the forums on un-en and enforceable agreements.

 

A CCA request is sent to a dca toget them to show they have right to collect the debt.

 

A SAR is sent to the original creditor to get ALL information held on you.

 

As Capquest have returned your CCA request with the fee and have passed the matter back to HFC, Capquest are now out of the equation.

 

Just deal with HFC

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i see from your other thread you haven't got your SAR back? when is their time up for you>?when you say a reconstructed one is good enough? does that mean they can send me anything?? and not the original one as the CCA request asks for? seems pointless to ask for a CCA if this means nothing? confused

 

what other thread?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

My SAR is due back in the next week or so.

 

There are more cases now where Judges view a properly reconstructed agreement as being valid. Have a look around the forums on un-en and enforceable agreements.

 

A CCA request is sent to a dca toget them to show they have right to collect the debt.

 

A SAR is sent to the original creditor to get ALL information held on you.

 

As Capquest have returned your CCA request with the fee and have passed the matter back to HFC, Capquest are now out of the equation.

 

Just deal with HFC

 

ims

 

i would sar hfc and inc a copy of a utils bill but with sig blanked out.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, im21 is on 'me to challenge HFC Bank' you are both on this one, which as you are in the situtaion yourself means you are my experts lol

 

I have to say, dx has been my mentor. Anwers are brief but it was dx's posts that got me to doing a lot (and I mean a lot) of reading and research. I am by no means an expert but give answers on the basis of my own experience and a lot of reading.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

another thing i dont know is how they found me, i have moved about 6 times since this loan was taken out and i never gave them my new address, my partner owns the house, so i;m not on any register and all the bills are in his name too? where can i get the standard SAR letter from and how many days etc do they have to respond.? tks again y

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...