Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ForwardThinker vs Capital One - Offer Received


ForwardThinker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently sent my prelim letter to Capital One requesting the refund of my late payment and overlimit fees from them.

 

Today I received a letter back from them, saying that they were prepared to refund £220 out of the £300 I had asked for as a goodwill gesture, which would result in the charges all being altered to £12 rather than the £20 that I had been charged.

 

Just a question, if I accepted this, they have said that it would be added to my account balance, and in this particular case, it would mean that my total debt to them would be wiped clean, but the account would also have around £90 on top of the balance available which if I used, I'd have to pay back. So what I'm asking is would it be possible for me to request a cheque or is there something obvious I'm not understanding?!

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently sent my prelim letter to Capital One requesting the refund of my late payment and overlimit fees from them.

 

Today I received a letter back from them, saying that they were prepared to refund £220 out of the £300 I had asked for as a goodwill gesture, which would result in the charges all being altered to £12 rather than the £20 that I had been charged.

 

Just a question, if I accepted this, they have said that it would be added to my account balance, and in this particular case, it would mean that my total debt to them would be wiped clean, but the account would also have around £90 on top of the balance available which if I used, I'd have to pay back. So what I'm asking is would it be possible for me to request a cheque or is there something obvious I'm not understanding?!

 

Thanks for your help.

 

hi normally they refund it to the account if it is in "debt" speak to them regarding getting the £90 seperately. Also inform them that you accept the cash as part settlement and will continue to seek the balance.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

That does make sense, as the leftover money above the credit limit (so not what they let me "borrow") wouldn't be part of it, unless they somehow claim it is part of what they are letting me borrow?

 

They've also refunded me a bit for the Payment Protection insurance refund blunder thing that they've had to do, so not doing too bad with Capital One, if only Natwest were the same!

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

That does make sense, as the leftover money above the credit limit (so not what they let me "borrow") wouldn't be part of it, unless they somehow claim it is part of what they are letting me borrow?

 

They've also refunded me a bit for the Payment Protection insurance refund blunder thing that they've had to do, so not doing too bad with Capital One, if only NatWest were the same!

 

Thanks for your help!

 

your welcome.:D

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...