Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • You're right of course, just jarring when an actual man child is knocking on my door so close to the end. Anyway, I'll keep this thread updated if ever any exciting does actually happen. Thanks again.
    • Yes I think you are right. I have to say I think most people would be honest and you would be unlucky to be with somebody who was going to rip you off
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFO Services/Barclaycard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4330 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 171
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's page and pages of print outs and just has a date entry on the history of the account that it is now Roxburghe's and any payments should be allocated to them. This information also contains the last payment date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:madgrin:Interesting confirms LP date and amend to show true buyer???????????

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

More important - it shows a 'third party amend' to reflect true buyer. Looks like the third party may be HFO itself - so BC has changed the record at HFO's behest, probably without investigation to ascertain the facts. You must follow this up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks again guys. Who do I need to follow it up with exactly? BC?

 

Also with the LP being the date it is will the SB mean anything?

Edited by Uppyboy
Further question.
Link to post
Share on other sites

This needs a carefully worded letter to Barclaycard asking exactly who the account was sold to - company number, name and address - and who added the third party info and why, and whether that info has been verified. Remember, this is an SAR response - it comes under ICO auspices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

uppboy

 

Have you complained formaly to the OFT yet? If not you must do so as soon as possible and make sure they get a copy of that paperwork.

 

So HFO are either getting BC to amend details to hide the truth - or have access to do it themselves?

either way it is the manipulation of data in order to decieve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi,

 

Nothing for months and then HFO have sent an assignment letter to Roxburghe and Roxburghe have sent the standard letter which starts the whole process again.

 

http://www.redrouteconsulting.com/HFO/HFOAssignment.jpg

http://www.redrouteconsulting.com/HFO/Roxburghe1.jpg

 

HFO had the time barred letter so I don't know why Roxburghe are making contact.

 

I did complain to the OFT and heard nothing back, but will get in touch again and send this further information as surely this is harassment?

 

All help and advice is always most appreciated.

Edited by Uppyboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Nothing for months and then HFO have sent an assignment letter to Roxburghe and Roxburghe have sent the standard letter which starts the whole process again.

 

http://www.redrouteconsulting.com/HFO/HFOAssignment.jpg

http://www.redrouteconsulting.com/HFO/Roxburghe1.jpg

 

HFO had the time barred letter so I don't know why Roxburghe are making contact.

 

I did complain to the OFT and heard nothing back, but will get in touch again and send this further information as surely this is harassment?

 

All help and advice is always most appreciated.

 

Have you still got the envelopes thise letters came in?

 

Check the postmarks on them both. - or even better scan and upload them if you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...