Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Information for landlords in England on tenant eviction: assured shorthold tenancies, including eviction notices, Section 21, Section 8, accelerated possession, possession orders, bailiffs  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sutty V Yorkshire Bank


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6299 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. First time posting on here but have been on MSE for a few months now. I have finally got up the balls to begin the process of reclaiming my bank charges but would like a little guidance. This site is very helpful and gives me most of the info I require but just got a few questions.

 

1. I'm in the RAF and have just moved to Scotland. I've noticed something in the forums about Scottish law being different. Does this now apply to me and if so, how exactly?

 

2. As I have just moved I am still in the process of having my address changed by YB. Would it be beneficial to wait until my new address is registered before going ahead with my SAR?

 

Thanks in advance for any help you can all offer. All the best. Sutty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sutty and welcome. If your account is with an English branch I would be inclined to leave your account there and use that address for any contact you make. I cannot imagine it would take YB long to change your address, but you could write your current address and point out you have just moved and send the old one as well to be on the safe side.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all. Just thought I'd let you all know the stage I'm at as I have become a little bit stuck.

Basically a standard claim so far, I claimed, they defended, all the usual stuff that happens. However, when they put in their allocation questionaire they applied for a stay which has been granted so "action is stayed until 7 March 2007"

They have previously offered me a settlement of £1386 which i declined as my claim is for £1977 plus £220 court fees. My question is what do I do now? Do I wait for Yorkshire Bank to contact me or do I write to them to try and usher them along? Any help would be gratefully received. Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sutty. When YB applied for a Stay on my court action, I just left it to them to contact me. After all, we've given them plenty of opportunity to come to a satisfactory conclusion by sending the prelim and lba letters. They actually paid up just before the Stay came to an end.

 

PJ

Advice & opinions given by pjdudley69 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. Also visit legal seagulls for more friendly help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool. Did you get paid in full PJ?

I think i'd still like to send one more letter. At least that shows i've done everything in my power to come to a settlement should a judge look at it. Any ideas how I should word it anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep I got paid in full Sutty, both times. This is the one where it got as far as issuing a claim tho' http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/yorkshire-clydesdale-bank-successes/7890-pjdudley69-yorkshire-bank.html

 

If you read round the other threads, especially in the successes section of the forum, you'll get an idea of their tactics and what to expect at each stage from start to finish.

Advice & opinions given by pjdudley69 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. Also visit legal seagulls for more friendly help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sending something along these lines, you will need to amend though:

Thank you for providing me with a copy of your completed N149 Allocation Questionnaire, which I received on **/**/**.

 

Referring to the Allocation Questionnaire, I must admit to being somewhat surprised by your response to Section A (Settlement). You have ticked ‘yes’, thereby requesting a one month postponement in proceedings in order that a settlement may be reached by way of negotiation.

 

Please note that throughout the process of this claim, neither yourselves nor your client have ever given any indication whatsoever that you wish to settle this matter without the need for litigation. In fact, all my previous attempts at dialogue with your client have been met with outright refusals to negotiate this matter, and on **/**/** I received a letter from you which explicitly stated that the bank had issued its final response and therefore would not enter into any further correspondence. It is for this reason that I felt I had no alternative but to seek redress by way of Court action.

 

Having said the above, I do believe that litigation should always be a last resort and would of course be happy to settle this matter without the need for a hearing. Please be advised though, that I am completely confidant in the strength of my claim and believe that your clients charges could indeed be proved to be unlawful penalty’s which you are trying to cloak as contractual service charges. For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £***.

 

In light of your indication of your intention to negotiate settlement, I will await your communication informing me of how you wish to proceed. I trust this will come before **/**/**, as this is final day of the month you requested to reach a settlement in your allocation questionnaire.

 

A copy of this letter will also be sent to the court.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £***.

 

Letter sounds good - just a suggestion, but knowing the habit that YB have of making offers without including costs and the 8% interest, i would add something at the end of the above quoted sentence to say that you will only settle for the full amount of claim plus interest accrued to date of settlement.

 

PJ

Advice & opinions given by pjdudley69 are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional. Also visit legal seagulls for more friendly help and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That sum '***' is intended to include interest and costs. However, if you like you can spell out the separate sums, remember it is a template, you can amend as you see fit.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just to update everyone, been a bit busy but finally got this written up tonight. Going to get the missus to post it tomorrow.

 

"Dear Miss Ross

 

Thank you for providing me with a copy of your completed N149 Allocation Questionnaire, which I received on 18/01/07.

Referring to the Allocation Questionnaire, I must admit to being somewhat surprised by your response to Section A (Settlement). You have ticked ‘yes’, thereby requesting a one-month postponement in proceedings in order that a settlement may be reached by way of negotiation.

I do believe that litigation should always be a last resort and would of course be happy to settle this matter without the need for a hearing. Please be advised though, that I am completely confidant in the strength of my claim and believe that your client’s charges could indeed be proved to be unlawful penalties that you are trying to cloak as contractual service charges. For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £1977.45 plus £220.00 costs

In light of your indication of your intention to negotiate settlement, I will await your communication informing me of how you wish to proceed. I trust this will come within seven days of your receipt of this letter.

A copy of this letter will also be sent to the court."

 

Had to adjust some bits but I think it gets all the points across and would show a court I am attempting to negotiate with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update everyone, been a bit busy but finally got this written up tonight. Going to get the missus to post it tomorrow.

 

"Dear Madam

 

Thank you for providing me with a copy of your completed N149 Allocation Questionnaire, which I received on 18/01/07.

 

Referring to the Allocation Questionnaire, I must admit to being somewhat surprised by your response to Section A (Settlement). You have ticked ‘yes’, thereby requesting a one-month postponement in proceedings in order that a settlement may be reached by way of negotiation.

 

I do believe that litigation should always be a last resort and would of course be happy to settle this matter without the need for a hearing. Please be advised though, that I am completely confidant in the strength of my claim and believe that your client’s charges could indeed be proved to be unlawful penalties that you are trying to cloak as contractual service charges. For this reason, I will only settle for the full amount of the claim, namely £1977.45 plus £220.00 costs.

 

In light of your indication of your intention to negotiate a settlement, I am peeved that there has been no communication whatsoever from yourselves during the one month stay.

 

I trust this has been an oversight on your part and trust you will contact me within seven days from the date of this letter.

 

A copy of this letter will also be sent to the court."

 

 

You are really too late to send the letter, the one month has now expired, you need to be quicker off the mark.

 

I have amended the letter above so that it is more suitable - send that.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...