Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

can i claim vet fees off owner whos dog attacked mine


littlemissme
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3560 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 11 months later...
  • 4 months later...

i'm a student without a lot of money, so before i spend the 70 quid or so i've heard it costs to pursue small claims action it would be nice to have a better sense of the anticipated outcome.

 

can anyone speak to what the law says about these types of cases and what is likely to happen in small claims court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
i'm a student without a lot of money, so before i spend the 70 quid or so i've heard it costs to pursue small claims action it would be nice to have a better sense of the anticipated outcome.

 

can anyone speak to what the law says about these types of cases and what is likely to happen in small claims court?

Well how about going to the small claims website yourself and finding out the facts. "I've heard" isn't a fact.

 

The small claims website will explain everything, including what it costs, how to fill in the forms, what you need to provide as proof and what will happen. It's always better to look for and read the facts for yourself, thatn rely on hearsay and supposition. If your dog was attacked by another dog, then you need to sue the person who was in charge of the dog at the time. If you are able to porive that this dog did the attacking, then the person in charge is liable for ALL of the vet fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well how about going to the small claims website yourself and finding out the facts. "I've heard" isn't a fact.

 

The small claims website will explain everything, including what it costs, how to fill in the forms, what you need to provide as proof and what will happen. It's always better to look for and read the facts for yourself, thatn rely on hearsay and supposition. If your dog was attacked by another dog, then you need to sue the person who was in charge of the dog at the time. If you are able to porive that this dog did the attacking, then the person in charge is liable for ALL of the vet fees.

 

apologies if i wasn't very clear but you misunderstood my question.

 

i don't care so much whether it costs £70, £75, etc. to initiate a small claims action.

 

what i'm interested in learning -- and what reading the small claims website cannot speak to -- is my probability of a successful judgment based on the experience of others. the probability of success is based on the law, the judge, jurisdiction, etc. reading the small claims website won't help me understand these issues as well as hearing from someone who has pursued similar action.

 

if anyone has pursued a similar claim in small claims court i'd appreciate hearing your story. thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No-one here is a physic so we cant really tell you of probabilities of success.

 

But speaking generally, if someone does an action that causes someone else damage and expense then they can claim damages in court, whether they are succesfull will depend on how they put together their case and the evidence they rely upon, you cant just turn up and say to the judge 'that dog bit my dog', you'll need evidence of the attack and evidence of the cost of vets, etc.

 

I suspect there is case law to also rely upon, case law is a similar case to yours which resulted in the outcome you desire, case law is normally cases from a High Court, Baili has a database of cases > http://www.bailii.org/

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

My little 3 yr old jrtx dog was bitten last week by a Labrador causing us to have to take her to the vet. She was badly bitten on her leg & had to have 3 lots of stitches. I spoke to our local dog warden today and she said that because she was off the lead that we would be liable for any costs. But the other dog was also off the lead. My dog did bark at the other dog but has never bitten anything. The warden said that the rules changed about someone being in control of their dog in Shropshire, but I can't see anywhere that states if both dogs are off their leads. I have approached the owner of the lab but he just keeps saying that it's unfortunate & won't be giving us anything. Apart from the financial side (we're struggling) it has been very upsetting for all of us. So I don't know the best action to take now, can anyone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...