Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

just starting to try to claim my charges back ***WON***


leeshare
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You need to make a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act 1998, see the letter to send in the templates library.

 

To be honest though, you've gone about this the wrong way round. You've sent a prelim letter and a letter before action, sop your next step is to file a county court claim. Trouble is, you don't know how much you're claiming for! You'll need to make the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) as soon as possible, and you'll not be able to continue to the next stage untill you get the statements back so can get a definate figure. The Data Protection Act allows 40 days for compliance, so you've got a bit of a wait I'm afraid!

 

In the meantime, please read up as much as you can in the FAQ section - especially the Step by Step instructions and the FAQ's themselves.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh, and in answer to your last question - yes, you will get your money back, IF you follow the correct tried and tested procedure. Lloyds have settled every claim so far.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The SAR is availible as a template to edit as appropriate and print off. You'll find it in the Templates library, as you will all the letters you'll possibly need. Send it by recorded delivery to Penny Berryman at Lloyd's Data Protection Act address, which you'll find at the top of this forum's list of threads as a sticky. Please read the FAQ's and step by step instructions though, they should answer 90% of any questions you may have.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Take no notice what they say. They're doing their best to put you off, thats all. Hardly going to make it easy for you are they!

 

Have you sent a preliminary approach for repayment, then 14 days later a letter before action, then waited another 14 days? If so, yes, its time to file a court claim.

 

There are 2 ways you can do this. Either online, here https://www.moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco2/index.jsp or by sending/taking a completed N1 claim form http://www.dream-concepts.com/magicbunny/n1_eng.pdf to the local county court. Particulars of claim for the moneyclaim method are here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html, and for the N1 here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, Lloyds won't pay up untill after you file a court claim. They are one of the ones who like to drag it out for as long as possible, I suppose in the hope that it will put people off. Don't let it. Its YOUR money, and all you need is a bit of patience and persistance and you will get it back. They've paid up every single claim so far remember, so that just goes to show who's the more worried about going to court, don't you think?

 

All the help and assistance you may need will be right here on this forum.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Everyone has won against Lloyds!!! As I said before, they've paid out every claim - cos they've got no bloomin choice! See the 'successes' forum, or my threads still floating about I think - I just won too!:) I would suggest you need to read up a bit more on the legalities - the charges are unlawful, its as simple as that. If Lloyds or any other bank were to take a claim to court they would lose! The law is clear on penalty charges and this no more or less applies to Lloyds than any other bank - only difference is, that Lloyds kick and scream a bit before paying up. Its all bluff though, and the longer they stall the more interest they have to pay you!

 

Anyway, back to your question. I suggest you file your claim at your local court rather than using moneyclaim. You need to use the N1 form which you will find in the templates library, and to attach to it you need the N1 particulars of claim, also in the library. Fill out the N1, take 3 copies, take 3 copies of the Particulars, and 3 copies of your schedule. Take or post your 3 sets to your local court with the fee and they will issue your claim.

 

On the front of the N1;

 

'The claimant' is self explanitory!

 

'The defendant' is Lloyds TSB Bank Plc (the Plc is important to include!)

and the address is 25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN.

 

'Brief details' - "Moneyclaim for return of default penaly charges levied to the claimants bank account by the defendant bank, plus interest at the statutory rate."

 

'Value' - Charges - £*** Interest - £***

 

Fill in the box in the bottom corner re the value

 

'Particulars of claim' are attached

 

Sign the statement of truth.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically yes. Moneyclaim does'nt give you much space to fully particularise your claim, and there is no room for a schedule which is essential. If you claimed online you'd have to send a schedule by post, but even then Lloyds would submit the "not adequate grounds for claim" rubbish. Most judges would see this for what it is - an attempt to intimidate the claimant, but some unfortunately don't and it can cause extra hassle. Much easier if you just file on an N1 to start with.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Same form - the N1 is the standard claim form. Fill in and print off online, 3 copies remember.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the spreadsheet.

 

What about it? The step by step instructions (link in my sig) explains all the stages involved, including the Court Claim stage.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Lee,

 

Thats fine for brief details. As for the POC, I'd stick to the template. What sort of personal details do you mean? Obviously you need to add your account number, etc.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the first box on the n1 form " In the " what do i put there.

Leave that blank. The court fill that in.

sorry to seem dim, but i dont want this form returning or being filled in wrong, thanks for you help.
No problem, better to be safe than sorry. Couple of other details to note - In the 'claimant' part, make sure you include your title before your name and for the 'defendant' make sure you put Lloyds TSB Bank PLC. Seems like minor details I know, but without them they may not issue your claim.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just the charges.

 

In the box; amount claimed = charges + interest, court fee is whatever fee is relevant, solicitors costs is 0.00, total is amount claimed + court fee.

 

'No' to Human rights act.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You'll get a notice of issue back from the court in around 5 days. It will state a date when your claim has been deemed served. From that date, Lloyds will acknowledge within 14 days, which will give them an additional 14 days (so 28 in total) to file a defence. Which they will, probably on the 28th day.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It is unusual to wait that long but not unheard of. At my local court, Swindon, they were taking around 2 weeks to issue claims, it just depends how busy they are. Give them a ring when their open again and find out whats going on.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it. If they've filed a defence you cannot file for judgement.

 

Proposed directions -

 

Please see the attached draft order for directions, for the courts due consideration

Then print out this draft order and attach it to your AQ - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/53570-new-strategy-allocation-questionaires.html#post482191

 

Other information -

 

The Claimant proposes the attached draft order for directions be made into an order. If ordered, the Claimant believes these directions will allow the overriding objective's to be furthered in that they will fully identify the most fundemental issues in dispute (as detailed below), and allow them to be assessed so that this claim may proceed justly and expediently.

 

- The crux upon which this claim rests is the true cost incurred by the Defendent as a result of the contractual breach from which its charges arise. If the Defendent cannot substantiate the cost of each charge as proportionate to its loss incurred, it has charged contractual penalties contrary to the UTCCR 1999 and common law principles established since the early 1900's.

 

- In the event that the Defendents charges were accepted as being a fee for a service (which is denied), examination of its true costs is required to determine whether the price is reasonable as required by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

 

As the law relating to contractual penalties is long established, the Claimant believes the outstanding issues to be of fact. Accordingly, the Claimant respectfully requests that the claim be allocated to the small claims track, and estimates that the hearing of the claim should last no longer than one hour.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Lee. So you've been asked to provide this, yes? -

a) A schedule setting out each charge repayment of which is sought, showing the date, amount, and reason given (if any) for that charge being made;

b) copies of any statement or other document relied upon as showing that each and every charge has been made;

c) a statement of evidence of all matters relied upon as tending to show that the charges are irrecoverable as penalties or otherwise;

d) copies of decided cases and other legal materials to be relied upon.

 

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

If so, you need to send to the court and to SC&M;

 

a) A schedule of charges

b) Statements showing charges or account info provided under your subject access request

c) A statement of evidence

d) Cases and statutes, as found in the Basic Court Bundle

 

The 28 days would be from the 12th - but get it ready and sent as early as possible.

 

DOES THAT MEAN IN SIMPLE TERMS THAT "IF [problem] DONT SEND THERE BUNDLE TO ME AND THE COURT BY THE 8TH OF APRIL THEN I WIN???????"

Yes.;-)

  • Haha 1

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty much, yes. They will have settled before then anyway more than likely, but if they don't comply by submitting the evidence as ordered by the specified date then their defence will be struck out. So yes, that means you win, although there are some technicalities you'd have to go through first - I.e. applying for judgement. As I said though, they'll almost certainly settle before then.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anytime around now;)

 

Having said that, some claimants actually turn up in court, only to find they've sent a fax saying they'll settle. See the "Got a court date?...." link in my sig for a few pointers on what to do if this is the case.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Very well done Leeshare, and definately some good advice in your last post there.:)

 

Welcome to the winners enclosure!!:D

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...