Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Virgins trains, I'm an idiot


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A Solicitor who does local work at your local Court would be best: a) they know the prosecutors / magistrates etc, and b) they are probablyin and out of there every day on similar cases.

Try and avoid the Peter Carter-****'s :wink: of the world, they will charge you a fortune for a posh letter that will just harden the spine of any seasoned railway prosecutor!

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the best ways to find an appropriate solicitor for this kind of work is to wander along to the Magistrates Court where the case might be heard. Ask the security guys to point out a local solicitor. I know many in south Essex, and I would be hard pressed to point out which one would be best.

 

Generally, look for the tired expression, avoid the man with the best suit or the best car in the car park. Don't be put off if the tired old man passes you to the 'new kid' at the office, the wiser chaps will steer him/her because they will be concerned about the reputation of their practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know when I can expect to hear from the TOC? I know having read previous threads they have 6 months to respond, but is there any sort of timeframe they generally come back within or do I just have to sweat it out until I hear from them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, you will have to wait, but even with the busiest TOC prosecution offices you can reasonably expect to receive your letter within 6 weeks of the date of incident. Write back as soon as you get the letter and I'll come to suggestion for that in a moment.

 

It's worth remembering that the people who have the training in identifying and dealing with ticket offences are the Rail inspectors not the Police and that is why the Police Officer took no part in dealing with it. Usually, Police only attend on request to assist in identifying a traveller or to deal with a public order issue, or more serious crime. The Police Officer may have stood by as a witness to the interview, but wouldn't normally deal with any ticket issue at all.

 

Periodically I think it worth reminding new readers of these threads what the possible outcomes are:

 

Altering a ticket isn't forgery. If you had made a fake ticket that would be a different matter.

 

Using an altered ticket may be charged as an 'attempt to avoid a fare' contrary to Section 5.3.a of The Regulation of Railways act (1889), or as a strict liability breach of National Railways Byelaw 20.1 (2005) if you made the alteration and 20.2 as the user. In both cases the maximum penalty is a fine of up to £1000 for each offence on summary conviction.

 

If it is a first offence and you are convicted, the worst that you are likely to face (unless there are any aggravating features that we are unaware of) is a fine of around £350.00 if you are summonsed and don't respond. That's the advisory entry point in the Magistrates guidelines and is based on the assumed average weekly earnings. You might also be ordered to pay prosecution costs ( probably £100 to £150 )and compensation of any fare avoided along with a fixed 'victim surcharge' of £15.00 imposed on every person who is fined by the Magistrates.

 

The figures quoted are from my personal daily experience of seeing similar matters dealt with and cannot be relied upon as a definitive guide. If this does go to Court, entering a 'guilty' plea at the earliest opportunity will attract the maximum 'discount' and fines etc will be reduced accordingly by the Magistrates.

 

Now to look at how you might be able to avoid any Court appearance and therefore avoid a record of conviction. You might be able to avoid this by co-operating fully with the rail company once they write to you.

 

If it is a first offence, I suggest that you might write back immediately, apologising for your 'uncharacteristic and irrational act, borne of a desire to try to save money' (or your words to that effect) and offering to make good all and any reasonable costs incurred by the rail company if the matter can be settled without the need to trouble a Court, thereby protecting your good name.

 

Try explaining that a conviction for this 'one-off abberation' would have a disproportionate effect on your career and given the uncertainty of employment prospects in the current financial climate, you are asking for this to be taken into consideration.

 

Give an assurance that you will never again travel without a valid ticket and adding an apology to the company and staff concerned for the work that your actions have caused is always worthwhile

 

The TOC do not have to agree, but if they are satisfied that they are going to get back all of their costs and any unpaid fares with a minimum of work and expense, they will give it serious consideration.

 

There is nothing that you can do to expidite this until you receive their letter, but if I were you, that's what I would be preparing myself to do. Make sure that you have funds available to pay their settlement charge in one go and promptly if they do agree to your request.

 

.

Edited by Old-CodJA
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

To give you more detail on the ticket, the old ticket was an A4 sheet of paper that I photocopied and changed the date on, so clearly from their perspective there was a clear effort made to avoid paying a fare. Secondly, just to give you full disclosure, it was for a first class ticket, I'm not sure if that is relevant or not, I suspect it will increase the size of the fine they hand out, so I am not sure if this falls under the fare avoidance as you suggested or forgery

 

In your experience, what is the likelyhood I can settle it out of court without a criminal record/caution, or does it entirely depend on who is dealing with this?

 

I'm having an aweful time dealing with this, both unable to sleep and on edge every morning when the post comes through to see who (TOC or BTP) will be dealing with this

 

One final question, will Virgin trains not automatically assume this isn't the first time I've done this and try to pursue harsher penalties?

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the tone of your posts, it is easy to see that you are not an old 'jail bird', who would currently be totally unconcerned by the whole thing.

 

I agree with the idea that there are sevearl different charges that could be laid, but the probability is that the railway will stick to what it knows best, which is the 'avoid rail fare' issue.

 

Privately, they may have all manner of theories, but the only thing that counts are the matters that they can actually demonstrate.

 

Until you are contacted by them, please try to relax. Even when you do get a letter from Virgin, keep it in perspective. The issue is a train fare, not murder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi,

 

I would like to know what happened as I am now in the same situation that you was. I was caught on using my own doctored Virign e- train ticket and now am really worried about going to court and getting a criminal record.

 

1) Was you able to settle this out of court? If so how did you go about doing it and what was the result?

 

2) did you hire a lawyer to help?

 

3) if this wasn't settled out of court, what was the result in court? Ie the amount you had been ordered to pay and if it resulted in a

 

 

Please let me know what happened and how things turned out for you I'd appreciate it very much.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey

 

I got very lucky

 

Not sure what happened but I never got any correspondance letter back after the incident itself

 

I would suggest just wait and see, if they get in toug with follow up action, then ask the people on this forum what the best course of action is as they are very knowledgeable on these matters, until then, just try not to worry

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just trying my luck and didn't expect OP to reply but gladly seen a post here.

 

You're very lucky there, I don't think that's the case with me as 15 mins the train was due to arrive into the station, the train manager noticed something didn't seem right with my ticket. I'd already done the journey by the time they confirmed it wasn't genuine so hadn't had a valid ticket for that ride.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...