Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have just received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for exceeding allowed parking time. I have not replied, appealed or contacted anyone from Euro Car Parks but would appreciate any advice before deciding on my next course of action. I have attached letter of correspondence    Euro Car Parks PCN.docx
    • It's better to keep advice on the open forum for everyone's benefit. Maybe you could post up the correspondence in a single pdf document and cover up your personal details, reference numbers and so on? HB
    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lloyds TSB : SAR - Incomplete disclosure. Data going back 16 years!


Lottysabber
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4866 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This case does not involve a debt issue. I'll be as brief as possible but might therefore miss something crucial out - so bear with me as its a bit complicated.

 

V. Long story short. Several years ago the OH and I suffered an attempt at ID theft made by a caller posing as someone from LTSB. Fortunately we sussed it before too much damage was done and as part of the wash-up it was agreed with the branch that they would delete all numbers for us so we wouldn't need to be worried about any further call because it couldn't be from them. No probs, or so we thought.

 

Wrong - of course - because within months we started to receive calls again - this time plainly genuine from the bank - and had to go back to them to remind them of the deal. More promises it wouldn't happen again but within a couple of months off we went once more. This time profuse apologies - even shown the screen at the branch showing no numbers - and absolute promises there would no further problem. Needless to say they failed again and the pattern repeated a couple of times before we gave up wasting our time.

 

Wind forward to late 2009 when the arrangements for entering additional payees to the Internet banking listings changed and needed to be confirmed by phone. Details entered in and when the call screen came up it offered two telephone numbers that could be rung neither of which were ours.

 

Alarm bells ring and we make a hasty trip to the branch the following day. They are absolutely insistent that they have no numbers - certainly not the ones we'd seen on line and even show us the account screen in the branch. Sure enough nothing is there. Its suggested that we'd imagined things etc etc. and we leave with no answers but a check later revealed that Phonebank had got the same number and a personal mobile number we had never provided to the bank but had used to make Phonebank transactions.

 

Back at the branch a couple of days later we are assured that they don't understand where the numbers have come from - as they do not have them at the branch - and that they've been deleted. A check with Phonebank reveals that the numbers have gone. We complain, asking for an explanation as to how the situation has come about and await a reply.

 

Needless to say just a short while later an attempt to use Internet Banking throws up one of the same mysterious numbers (although the mobile number has disappeared and never shows again) and so this time we make a screengrab and head back to the branch again. They offer complete denials that they have any numbers and turn down the screengrab as "it might have been Photoshopped". We make a further complaint and are told this one will have to go to head office.

 

We then start to suffer other problems with inconsistent decisions from the branch - things are turned down on particular grounds but others - to which the same grounds apply - are agreed to and a chance visit to a branch in a different town sees us leaving with the very thing we had asked for at our home branch agreed to without question and some bemusement from staff there that our branch had not agreed to them in the first place.

 

We make another complaint seeking an explanation.

 

So, now three complaints running.

 

Getting v. worried at Christmas we make a SAR specifically requesting a full disclosure from all departments and details of all complaints - hoping to scoop up details of the numerous complaints we'd made about misuse of telephone numbers. We stop using Internet Banking (IB).

 

The OH finally recognises the mysterious number that had come up on the Internet Banking screen as an old works number - but he'd left that company 16 years before and had had no contact with them since.

 

A month later and we get a box full of documents and it takes us several months to work through it - no telephone numbers anywhere to be seen and no details of any complaints anywhere other than the ones we'd made in late 2009. LTSB reply to our complaints - lots of apologies, can't understand inconsistent approach, and an absolute assurance that they hold no numbers whatsoever. Hope we can mend the bridges etc etc.

 

OH is working away and a serious family illness intervenes and this all gets parked until the tail end of last year. Then OH tries to use IB again only to find the old works number showing again and a call to Phonebank reveals the same number with them. back to the branch and complain again only this time we call Phonebank using speakerphone in the bank. Branch staff hear the number and the mood changes from "these idiots are at it again" to a degree of panic.

 

Yet another complaint made and despite the fact that the HO complaints dept seem unable to grasp the slightly complicated complaint it is finally admitted that they do hold the mysterious number in their "Group Database" (not on our account profile) but it had now, we're told, been deleted so no need to worry. No further explanation as to its origins or why they were holding it or why it just kept reappearing is offered nor why it had not been disclosed in the SAR - although this had all been requested. They also deny that Phonebank captures incoming telephone numbers.

 

We're far from happy but are at the point where we just don't know where to go next. Suggestions? Or do we just put it down to experience?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...