Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Second Letter to bank


bluwind
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

just wondered what people thought of my second letter to my bank?

They have already replied to me stating that all there fees/charges where legal (even though i never contested this)

 

The Senior Manager

Service Quality Team

HSBC Bank Plc

Arlington business Centre

Millshaw Park Lane

Leeds

LS11 0PP

 

I write with regards to Your letter dated 21st January 2011 dispatched by “Laura Downing” who is one of your Service Improvement Officers, I would like you to have another look into my case regarding bank charges made against my account, I would also like to point out at this stage that I am not contesting the validity of any bank charges made against my account. The well documented “Test Case” has already proven these charges to be valid.

However it is my understanding that the Financial Ombudsman is still looking at cases which meet certain criteria the first being “financial hardship” (please note that this is financial hardship at the time of receiving charges and not current financial status). As I am sure you are already aware HSBC Bank is one of many banks who signed an agreement to treat all customers fairly who are in financial difficulty. I now reference the banking code 2008 with regards to proving hardship

1 - “regular requests for increased borrowing”, I increased my overdraft limit 4 times in three years and was refused an increase on 5 occasions within the same period making a total of 9 occasions for increased credit applications in three years.

2 – “repeatedly exceeding a credit card or overdraft limit without agreement”, this became an almost monthly ritual as I struggled to make ends meet, even more so as I was unemployed for the first quarter of receiving charges. Once I paid my bills, rent and council tax I had little enough for food and because of receiving charges I was left short.

3 – “Receiving more than £500 per year in bank charges”, this one needs little explanation and I believe we can both agree my yearly charges more than doubled this figure.

Also as per my last letter to you I would like to reiterate again that I was caught in a constant cycle of charges, each month my income was severely reduced by charges owed to yourself leaving me short and forcing me go overdraft again. Please find included with this letter yearly financial statements showing my Incomings and outgoings.

Please also note that I do not wish you to close this case as resolved until I have expressly wished you to do so. I would consider a refund or partial refund of fees/charges as a resolution (depending on the amount of partial refund)

Link to post
Share on other sites

O the case was only opened on the 20th jan, i couldnt believe it, i wrote the letter at 10am, posted at 3.30 on the 20th. they wrote back on the 21st and i received the letter this morning. so its only been open 3 days..

i will change my wording to the lending code. thank you for that, i couldnt believe how fast they responded and they even put in there letter "after reviewing your case"..of course it must have been a speedy review.

of course if i need to go to the omnidsbudman then the fact they took less than 12 hours to write a response must go in my favour that they havent reviewed the case properly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, i have just received another letter from the bank - another standard template. Even though i addressed the last one to the senior manager i still got a reply for service improvement officer., the letter basically went on to yet again 'boast' about winning the test case and that they can only look into charges for the past 6 months. i have written a reply but just wanted to ask if people think i should just go stright to the FSO now

 

My reply

THIS LETTER IS FOR THE ATTENTION OF THE SERVICE MANAGER, I DO NOT AUTHORISE ANYONE UNDER THE SENIORITY LEVEL OF A SERVICE MANAGER TO VIEW THE CONTENTS OF THIS LETTER.

Firstly I would like to apologise for the above statement, how I do feel it was necessary as my last letter was address for the attention of a senior manager and was dealt with by a ‘Service Improvement Officer’. The following is a list of questions/statements which I required answers to which were either not answered or even acknowledged in HSBC’s last correspondence:

1. I stated in my last letter that I am not contesting the validity of any bank charges against my account yet your “Service Improvement Officer” chose to waste an entire paragraph confirming something I already knew.

2. Your “Service Improvement Officer” the proceeded to explain that I would be required to complete an income and expenditure assessment to better understand my financial situation over the past 6 months. This was asked even though in my last letter I explained to yourselves that any financial assessment would be for the time of receiving charges and not current financial status.

3. Quote: “if we do not hear from you within the next eight weeks, we will consider matters resolved”. Your “Service Improvement Officer” chose to include this statement even though in my last letter I said “Please also note that I do not wish you to close this case as resolved until I have expressly wished you to do so.” May it is up to myself the complainant to decide when my case is resolved.

4. Please have a copy of my last letter address to yourself to hand as I wish to refer to it. I have already proven on 3 counts my financial hardship referenced in my last letter as 1 - “regular requests for increased borrowing”, 2 – “repeatedly exceeding a credit card or overdraft limit without agreement”, 3 – “Receiving more than £500 per year in bank charges”. So I will not be completing an income and expenditure assessment as I have already proved financial hardship at the time the charges were received.

Let me clarify what I am looking for as a resolution, the current balance of my account is £1021.06 in Debit, balance this against the charges I received between December 05 and December 08 which stands at £3055. I would like my account to be closed with a £0 balance and a cheque for £2033.94.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

wow thanks very much for that martin, im sure most everyone here feels they are hitting the heads against brick walls. Its just so fustrating as i was debt free before joining HSBC, luckily enough i opened a new account with Nationwide, found a new job and spent the last year and a half on beans on toast paying off the debts i built up because of them. I am finally comming to a stage where i see an end to the past 6 years of debt (and i know so many people have so much more debt haning over there heads and a really feel for anyone going through it), but it just winds me up that hsbc say they base my Hardship on my situation now.

 

Anyway sorry for the misplaced rant.. your a diamond martin. ill send it off and see what kind of response i get

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...