Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Closing Cahoot Account with Flexi loan outstanding


newbie5000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4745 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am looking to close my account with Cahoot but i have a flexiloan outstanding which it will be a long time before i can pay off. Since they have removed this service from my account am i still tied into cahoot with it (ie can the demand full repayment if i close my account). I see only negatives now with banking at Cahoot (Difficult to get money in quick as no fast pay,counter payments etc leading to unnessecary charges). I admit i used to use my cahoot flexiloan as a buffer to avoid fees by transferring money back aand forth as required thos has now no longer become an option.Cahoot seem to be ignoring my concerns over the availability to transfer funds quickly to stop fees etc and they do not see it has a problem.

 

I would rather move to the Nationwide account i have(one i opened for free cash withdrwls etc) where i can take more control over my financies since they have Branches. Cahoot used to be good but the information they now supply reguarding Direct debits etc is non existant now

Link to post
Share on other sites

The confusion i have now though is that the loan is now run by Santander and no longer has the benefits or can be controlled through my Cahoot account. Cahoot pass me to Santander on the issue and Santander pass me back to Cahoot. No one seems to have control over the issue. From what i believe Cahoot is still a seperate entitiy from Santander and still has its own department. Does moving the loan to Santander breech any conditions i may have had. I know it is a complicated issue which i am asking the best way to proceed. Have they effectively sold it to a 3rd party by moving it to Santander customer services.

 

Recently i missed a payment for a Santander CC and they would not let me pay from my Cahoot account only from a santander account this also makes me believe that are still a sperate unit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately Santander are legendary for their poor customer service - so I'm not in the least surprised at the pass-the-parcel approach. Cahoot is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Santander, and has been since Sandander hoovered up many of the UKs building societies (from memory, Cahoot was a brand of Abbey National).

 

They will have advised all customers of the changeover, and as such is perfectly legal and above-board. Your issue will always be with your original supplier. If they want to refer it to Santander, that's fine - but they chase this, NOT you. As you've found, you;re just the ping-pong ball in the middle.

 

Put your issues in WRITING, and ass that as your previous referrals to Sandander have been fruitless, this is now no longer an option, and you require thier immediate attention to resolve the matter. Failing which, you'll raise a formal complaint with FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You are one of thousands...

 

Sandander have been issuing fixed loans in the place of the flexiloan -

1. Terminate the flexi loan by writing to Santander.

2. When they issue you the new statements for the fixed loan account, within 14 days write and say you wish to cancel, you do not have to provide a reason. Consumer Credit Directive 2010 in force 1 Feb 2011 !

3. Put all details to FOS and wait and wait, and dont pay any more on either account.

4. Under CCD 2010 the banks have a duty to check creditworthyness before issuing a new loan. They can see mine is rot, so they should not have issued it.

5. All else fails it is an IVA or Time to pay through the courts.

6. Dont take life or yourself too seriously - no one else will.

7.Dont waste any more time on aiming to agree with Santander, its not worth your precious time.

 

Trust this helps, get in touch if you need to.

 

Kindest Christian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
You are one of thousands...

 

Sandander have been issuing fixed loans in the place of the flexiloan -

1. Terminate the flexi loan by writing to Santander.

2. When they issue you the new statements for the fixed loan account, within 14 days write and say you wish to cancel, you do not have to provide a reason. Consumer Credit Directive 2010 in force 1 Feb 2011 !

3. Put all details to FOS and wait and wait, and dont pay any more on either account.

4. Under CCD 2010 the banks have a duty to check creditworthyness before issuing a new loan. They can see mine is rot, so they should not have issued it.

5. All else fails it is an IVA or Time to pay through the courts.

6. Dont take life or yourself too seriously - no one else will.

7.Dont waste any more time on aiming to agree with Santander, its not worth your precious time.

 

Trust this helps, get in touch if you need to.

 

Kindest Christian

 

Please enlighten me as to how this would work and what the impact to myself this would be??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...