Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This journo thinks Trump wants a Mafia state. I wonder if his supporters really want him to be immune if he orders a political assassination? The surest sign yet that Donald Trump wants to run the US like the mafia INEWS.CO.UK The Trumps want to make sure nothing like the rule of law stops them  
    • Yes. I'd be very interested to know how the defendant fared in putting forward the defence that the calaimant had been contributorily negligent by not keeping their cat under control. I'm aware that some people might find that fatuous, distracting or confusing, but the reality is that I'm not aware of any law that imposes a duty upon cat owners to keep their pets under control.  Whereas I believe the law does hold dog owners responsible for their dogs in public places. I'm not certain it was at all beneficial to the OP to suggest that blaming the claimant was a credible defence...
    • Okay, perfect. they did say BS is invoked as soon as i fill in their application form, ill get a pin. i had to press them more on this as they didnt want to discuss BS much. so i should fill in the form and get the pin, then i can initiate BS. What will follow and what should i do after? Thanks again for all the help and patience.
    • Good evening, so not a good weekend reviewing paperwork -- I have lost some proofs of postage.. also, although not provided at CCA, they have now supplied a DN in their WS, please see scan of claimants WS (without statements) Document with tick boxes as signatures doesn't look like an agreement and is split across pages. Documents have been stapled and copied multiple times looking at the top left of them. Aside from that, having read other threads, I suspect they have everything? appreciate your input please Sorry for heavy redactions, I noticed the paperwork was see-through LinkHalifaxCC1.compressed.pdf
    • Received a final demand today Final demand.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

kermit1986 vs Abbey (new to claiming)


kermit1986
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got linked to this site by a friend earlier today after mentioning I was going to claim some bank charges Abbey hit me with earlier this year. Anyway, I've read the FAQ and had a look around but I don't know what the usual procedure is to start a claim . Abbey owe me £300 in charges (not including interest as that comes to about £5 so it's not really a high priority to me).

 

I paid them back for all the charges though, but when I heard more about bank charges being illegal and that I have a right to claim them back I started to look into it, and a guy on another forum sent me this letter template to claim my charges back with.

 

I was planning on filling out my details on that template, as well as sending some print outs of my bank statements from the months that the charges we're in (there all from Jan-May this year) and highlingting the charges out to them.

 

...after reading around on here though I'm getting mixed messages as to what to do first :confused:.

 

Also, just to clarify I'll list the reasons they put for my charges just to make sure that I can actually claim them.

Anyway, here they are;

  • Charge for Overdraft that has not been authorised x 5
  • Clearing Visa Payment whilst Overdrawn x 4
  • Charge for unpaid Direct Debit x 2

Basically, is the way I'm going about claiming these charges back sufficient?

and also, am I able to claim back all those charges listed?

 

Many thanks in advance. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kermit 1986,

Welcome to our forum, you're certainly in the right place for getting useful advice, everyone here is v. helpful. I joined a short while ago and I've found it really supportive.

You certainly can claim back the charges you listed - I am. You can claim back charges up to 6 years. I suggest you take a look at the FAQ's it sets out the procedure very clearly and you will also find templates for your letters to the bank in the library - good luck.

Abbey

6/10/06 - £1260 received in bank charges :-D

Lowell

7/2007 alleged debt 1

1/2008 closed file:)

1st Credit

4/2007 alleged debt

7/2007 complaint sent to TS & OFT

1/2008 Mackenzie Hall threatening legal action

2/2008 closed file:)

Lowell

7/2007 alleged debt 2

7/2007 CCA'd

11/2007 complaint sent to TS & OFT :?

Lowell's continue to harass :(

Lowell

6/2008 alleged debt 3

6/2008 CCA'd

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my LBA letter off to Abbey as well as 1 to Natwest for a recent overdraft charge they hit me with. Just opened up a new account with Halifax as well as a parachute account incase one of those 2 decides to boot me.

 

What are the chances of them settling the fee's after receiving an LBA letter?

 

Or is it pretty much always the next letter that lets them know you mean business and know what your doing that convinces them to just pay back what they've taken from you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received both my statements for the last month from my bank today. I'm not sure if this is around about the time I'd usually receive them, and I don't think I normally get them on the same day...but they have come but there is no response to the LBA I sent them last week, although there is a 'tips on managing your account' letter that has come with the Abbey statement, that has a list of all the different types of charges they enforce.

 

 

They (both Abbey & Natwest) still have until the 22nd to respond though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, Friday I think it was...

...I received letters from both my banks.

 

Natwest's consisted of something along the lines of how they're sorry I'm unhappy, and how they don't accept the statement that the office of fair trading brought up, however they where willing to refund the £76 they'd taken as a gesture of good will, which was a nice result! :)

 

Abbey though...they've basically said they're sorry I'm unhappy, but they won't offer a refund because the charges are in accordance with there charging structure, they sent a formal complaints form with the letter too.

 

My next step now is to send Abbey my LBA right?

This one - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/92-letter-before-action-consumer.html

 

...but I'd need to obviously edit out the bits that don't apply to me (for instance the line that mentions them not responding to my initial letter...as they did).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Right...just now I've got around to sorting out my LBA letter, it was about a month ago I recieved my response from Abbey, and I really did mean to respond with my LBA sooner, but things have been busy recently and I just kept putting it off.

 

I've just finished editing the LBA template to my own personal info and I'm fine to still send my LBA though right?

 

If so I shall send it off as soon as I get a reply tommorow (Monday October 16th).

Link to post
Share on other sites

*Sent!

 

Hopefully there response will be what I want to hear. Are Abbey likely to pay up with this letter, I've had a flick through the site and it seems the success rate of claiming back bank charges is phenomenal, but I don't know if Abbey have a different reputation or anything. It's Approx £339 I'm claiming off them so it's not like I'm that big of a dent to there finances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok...

Today I got a letter through from Abbey saying they're sorry I'm unhappy and are looking into my charges. They still have until the 30th/31st as far as me giving them time to respond goes.

 

...anyone I checked my bank account today and they've put in £290 today (in various £20-35 increments) all as miscellaneous fee refund's. I'm just under £50 short of what I should've got, but maybe they're still yet to add them.

 

Anyway, I looked in my NatWest account today also and saw that I had been charged for an unpaid direct debit. I have been charged for one by Natwest over a month ago (like mentioned previously in this topic) and they wrote back saying they'd refund me this time as a gesture of goodwill, but in future they wouldn't. I should still claim that back though right?...I mean, what they said was lies...I have every right to claim and will win won't I?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a letter from Abbey yesterday telling me basically that there charges are legit, and will remain, but as a gesture of goodwill they paid me £290...which is close to my full ammount and I would've happily accepted that and called it quits to be honest...but last night I tried to get my bad credit note lifted off my account and I basically got treated like crap over the phone (abbeys phone banking services are pretty much full of s***).

 

Now I'm thinking I may as well go the next step so that I can make sure that my bad credit indication gets lifted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...

Today I got a letter through from Abbey saying they're sorry I'm unhappy and are looking into my charges. They still have until the 30th/31st as far as me giving them time to respond goes.

 

...anyone I checked my bank account today and they've put in £290 today (in various £20-35 increments) all as miscellaneous fee refund's. I'm just under £50 short of what I should've got, but maybe they're still yet to add them.

 

Anyway, I looked in my NatWest account today also and saw that I had been charged for an unpaid direct debit. I have been charged for one by Natwest over a month ago (like mentioned previously in this topic) and they wrote back saying they'd refund me this time as a gesture of goodwill, but in future they wouldn't. I should still claim that back though right?...I mean, what they said was lies...I have every right to claim and will win won't I?

 

3 new posts over the past week or so and no replies :confused:

 

Anyway...I got a letter of Natwest today basically saying they have responded to the Office of Fair Tradings statement of April 5th 2006 etc...but they are still within there rights to make charges because charges are only valid on credit cards, and not debit cards...

 

They said they'd pay me the £38 as a gesture of goodwill providing I sign the sheet (which also says that by signing they'll cancel any D/D's on my account).

I don't want to sign this now...because I use my natwest account to pay my phonebill via D/D.

 

What should I do?...LBA it?

 

Also regarding my Abbey claim, should I go the next step (after the LBA) do you think?

I could really do with the bad credit note lifted off my account and I could do with doing the easy way (which is to make them have to do it), or the long way (which is start paying my wages into that account for 3 months).

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 new posts over the past week or so and no replies :confused:

 

Anyway...I got a letter of NatWest today basically saying they have responded to the Office of Fair Tradings statement of April 5th 2006 etc...but they are still within there rights to make charges because charges are only valid on credit cards, and not debit cards...

 

They said they'd pay me the £38 as a gesture of goodwill providing I sign the sheet (which also says that by signing they'll cancel any D/D's on my account).

I don't want to sign this now...because I use my NatWest account to pay my phonebill via D/D.

 

What should I do?...LBA it?

 

Also regarding my Abbey claim, should I go the next step (after the LBA) do you think?

I could really do with the bad credit note lifted off my account and I could do with doing the easy way (which is to make them have to do it), or the long way (which is start paying my wages into that account for 3 months).

 

Kermit, take this evening and go over your statements carefully so you have a revised total for both accounts which allows for the refunds already made. Then dont mess about any longer and once your LBA expires issue a claim against them. Owing to the amounts involved they will probably back down very quickly, but dont be surprused if Abbey try and hang out longer.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply :)

I won't be able to look into tonight I don't think, but definitely tommorow or Saturday afternoon.

 

Just to clarify though, are you saying I should go over my statements and issue a claim for the excess ammount that I am still unpaid for after the goodwill payment?

 

I.e. the £339 - 290 = They owe me £49, then issue the claim?

 

Also, the Natwest letter...what would you (or anyone) advise me to do about that...they have me in a catch22 situation, I either take the money and have no D/D ability, or don't take the money and have D/D abilities. There being arrogant about it to say the least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

with regard to Natwest I would definitely LBA it. If nothing else (and of course if anybody actually reads the letter) they will know your serious.

 

Yes I would issue on Abbey for the £49 outstanding, send them a letter saying thanks for the interim offer but you are reserving your right to claim the balance, allow them another 7 days then file a claim.

 

Never forget this is YOUR money not theirs.

Alliance & leicester:Settled 8/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/alliance-leicester-successes/19700-tamadus-l.html?highlight=tamadus

Capital One:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/capital-one/16644-tamadus-capital-one.html?highlight=tamadus

MBNA 2 accounts:Settled 22/9/06 http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions-successes/13831-tamadus-mbna-i.html?highlight=tamadus

Smile:Settled 15/11/06

Egg Card:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 2/10/06

GE Money:S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent3/8/06 LBA sent 26/9/06

Abbey:ERC prelim sent 14/9/06. LBA sent 2/10/06. Now it's getting interesting so keep watching

Barclaycard:In criminal default watch this space

Lloyds TSB:In criminal default watch this space

 

If my comments have been useful please click the scales and let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...