Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCTV Advice needed please!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I work for a large firm, in the Hospitality industry, i wont give the name or clues as it would be instantly recognizable, and could lead to problems for me.

We have had CCTV installed in the public areas for some time, with the appropriate signage, etc.

because of a suspected number of recent stock thefts, the management have now said they are installing additional cameras in the private staff areas.

These include the staff room, where numerous staff get changed into uniform ( company policy forbids staff from wearing uniform outside of work, so have to get changed)(when confronted about this, management respond by saying that there is a lockable staff toilet to get changed in, (2 toilet cubicles, 1 male and 1 female) but when there is possibly 8-10 staff starting a shift there is no room for us all to get changed, so we have to use the staff room. as company policy also forbids staff from being on site for longer than 20 mins before your shift starts or 20 mins after shift ends, we cant stagger use of toilets either as there can be upwards of 16 staff at a shift change to all get changed either into or out of uniform.

Numerous staff have requested that the new camera be installed in the kitchen area as this is where the stock is being stolen from, but management have disagreed, as those responsible are believed to take stock out of the kitchen to consume in the staff room or the toilet area.

I really need advice about this, as i believe this is an invasion of privacy, yet i understand the need to catch the culprits, installing in the kitchen would to my mind have 2 results, 1, Deterrent,some of the culprits would not be stupid enough to steal on camera knowing the camera is there, 2, capture, those stupid enough to do so would get caught.

I dont understand the need to install a camera in the staff room as this infringes on personal time that we could resonably expect to remain private.

Any advice would be appreciated folks,

Cheers

Cold

Link to post
Share on other sites

The employer is on dodgy ground and you might want to take this up with the ICO. CCTV should never be used in areas where the employee should be able to enjoy a degree of privacy, except where serious crime is suspected and even there, the images should only be used to investigate an incident, and should not be routinely monitored.

 

The ICO has some useful guidelines on their WEBSITE and these may help you to formulate a grievance against the proposed installation and a list of awkward questions to ask your employer about how the CCTV will be used, who will have access to the recordings and in what circumstances, do they propose to provide additional, non-filemed areas in which you may be permitted to change, potential breaches of the Human Rights Act - quite an extensive list.

 

If you don't like the answers, then take it up with the ICO. Seems like a sledgehammer to crack a nut!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I'm very sorry that you and your colleagues are going through this. Sidewinder knows far more than I do, but to me the employer's actions sound completely OTT and privacy is important, as well as dignity etc.

 

My best, HB

Edited by honeybee13
Clairty plus I wish I could type properly.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Sidewinder but I would stick with the arguments around changing. The argument that a camera infringes on "personal time" is weak, and given the arguments that stock is being stolen and consumed in the staff room is unlikely to impress the ICO. Breaks, per se, are not "personal time" (the employer can set rules about things during breaks, so you are still legally under their control in such periods) and the employer could easily argue that these times when staff are on their premises and on break are the most vulnerable periods. However, the argument about changing is solid - there is an absolute right to privacy for dressing / undressing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like all the affected workers should be complaining to a union so that the union could address the issue with the employer, that way some sort of protection for the individual is achieved. Unless none of you belong to a union of course !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd look at the welfare regs for changing before trying to pursue via the DPA/ICO ;)

 

Google welfare regs changing rooms as i can't link here

 

What facilities do I need to provide for changing and storing clothing?

 

If the work activity requires your employees to change into and wear specialist clothing (overalls, a uniform, thermal clothing etc), then you must provide enough changing rooms for the number of people expected to use them.

Where a changing room is provided it should:

be readily accessible;

contain, or lead directly to, clothing storage and washing facilities;

provide seating;

provide a means for hanging clothes _ a hook or peg may be sufficient;

ensure the privacy of the user.

 

once you ascertain if your employer meets the requirements and also if they are stating people can change in the toilets correctly the cctv argument becomes easier as they can monitor anything apart from "private" areas as stated above.

 

The best way to back them off is via their possibly inappropriate facilities not the cctv argument

 

I would also not consider changing in a toilet cubicle reasonable

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I work for a large firm, in the Hospitality industry, i wont give the name or clues as it would be instantly recognizable, and could lead to problems for me.

We have had CCTV installed in the public areas for some time, with the appropriate signage, etc.

because of a suspected number of recent stock thefts, the management have now said they are installing additional cameras in the private staff areas.

These include the staff room, where numerous staff get changed into uniform ( company policy forbids staff from wearing uniform outside of work, so have to get changed)(when confronted about this, management respond by saying that there is a lockable staff toilet to get changed in, (2 toilet cubicles, 1 male and 1 female) but when there is possibly 8-10 staff starting a shift there is no room for us all to get changed, so we have to use the staff room. as company policy also forbids staff from being on site for longer than 20 mins before your shift starts or 20 mins after shift ends, we cant stagger use of toilets either as there can be upwards of 16 staff at a shift change to all get changed either into or out of uniform.

Numerous staff have requested that the new camera be installed in the kitchen area as this is where the stock is being stolen from, but management have disagreed, as those responsible are believed to take stock out of the kitchen to consume in the staff room or the toilet area.

I really need advice about this, as i believe this is an invasion of privacy, yet i understand the need to catch the culprits, installing in the kitchen would to my mind have 2 results, 1, Deterrent,some of the culprits would not be stupid enough to steal on camera knowing the camera is there, 2, capture, those stupid enough to do so would get caught.

I dont understand the need to install a camera in the staff room as this infringes on personal time that we could resonably expect to remain private.

Any advice would be appreciated folks,

Cheers

Cold

 

Intimidation from the employer.

Definitely.

 

C'mon guys, employers do have the right to take care of their premises, but all within reasonable precautions.

CCTV in changing rooms, hahaha! not inside of the lockers really? LOL

 

There is a possibility the CCTV can be positioned facing the entrance to the changing rooms. That is the furthest the cameras can go.

Otherwise, I am sure there are some other means to catch the thief.

CCTV in changing rooms is just employer's laziness... to think. Mainly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...