claim form from northampton county court DG solicitors

[chelsea101]

I think my credit report is shot already

already been defaulted

have no intention and hopefully will never need to use credit again

[caro]

Fair enough.

[Peterbard]

I think my credit report is shot already

already been defaulted

have no intention and hopefully will never need to use credit again

 

HI chealsea

Tanks for the response.

 

As you know , i do not agree with this action, to me it just gives the creditor the additional recourse of issuing a default for the breach of the original agreement.

 

Seems to me that you would have been much better just continuing to honour the deal and pleading unfair treatment.

We will see i suppose

 

Peter

[Peterbard]

Good evening the Bard

 

Well, I am not a member of the site team (unfortunately) and my name is Mould, The Mould. No offence meant to you Peterbard.

 

Chelsea has stated that when he has anything new to post on his case, then he will of course do that Peter, so why are you so insistent/persistent with your enquirey into this particular case?

 

Kind Regards

 

The Mould

 

PS. The above is not off-topic

 

Hi

 

Just for clatification, i am aware that The Mould is not a member of the site team. My mention of "Mould/ Site team" reffered to the fact that the site team supports the views and advice given and followed by the OP.

 

Peter

[Peterbard]

Hi Chelsea

 

Just to keep you up to date with what developments are occuring in this area elswhere in the forum.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?257032-RBS-Mint-Loan-Court-Action-

[Peterbard]

Hi Chelsea

 

Can you say if there has been any developments in this

 

Regards

Peter

[The Mould]

If there were Peter, do you not think Chelsea would have posted in order to update?

 

Kind regards

 

The Mold

[caro]

Unfortunately many people don't Mould, which is very disappointing for those who find themselves with similar problems, and those who have offered advice and support.

[chelsea101]

just to clarify

case is still stayed at the moment and will keep everyone informed when anything happens

chelsea

[chelsea101]

Just to clarify

Claim is still stayed

Will let everyone know when anything happens

chelsea

[car2403]

It is clear to me, the opponent did not expect the contents of chelsea's defence against his claim and so he does not know how and if he can proceed and succeed with his claim.

 

It's not their choice, though, is it. Either the claim goes ahead as is and is heard in Court, or it's stayed indefinitely until an application to lift the stay (with a very good reason for not progressing prior to the stay) is made.

 

I think this is where the q's come from - yes, there may be no update given by the OP, but CAG sees so many threads end with no final whistle blown that queries are often raised. Yes, usually that means a deal is done, (you can usually tell from the absence of the OP) but there are other reasons.

 

I see no harm in asking for an update.

[Peterbard]

Just to clarify

Claim is still stayed

Will let everyone know when anything happens

chelsea

 

Thank you Chelsea

 

Best regards

Peter

[The Mould]

It's not their choice, though, is it. Either the claim goes ahead as is and is heard in Court, or it's stayed indefinitely until an application to lift the stay (with a very good reason for not progressing prior to the stay) is made. Er, the claimant does have a choice, that is, notify the Production Centre that he wishes to proceed with his claim or remain silent.

 

I think this is where the q's come from - yes, there may be no update given by the OP, but CAG sees so many threads end with no final whistle blown that queries are often raised. Yes, usually that means a deal is done, (you can usually tell from the absence of the OP) but there are other reasons. As I have said, I agree that it is frustrating when a thread/case goes stale, unfortunately, not all threads will provide a learning outcome for one reason or another.

 

I see no harm in asking for an update.

I have not stated (impliedly or expressed) that it is harmful to continue to request an up date on a stale thread.

Kind regards

The Mould

[car2403]

Er, the claimant does have a choice, that is, notify the Production Centre that he wishes to proceed with his claim or remain silent.

 

Thanks, that's confirming what I said.

 

As I have said, I agree that it is frustrating when a thread/case goes stale, unfortunately, not all threads will provide a learning outcome for one reason or another.

Yup, and fewer more do so where we ask for an update

I have not stated (impliedly or expressed) that it is harmful to continue to request an up date on a stale thread.

 

 

What you actually said was;

 

If there were Peter, do you not think Chelsea would have posted in order to update?

 

I'll leave those reading this to decide what you meant, expressly or impliedly, then.

[car2403]

Some posts have been unapproved - let's keep this one on track, within the rules and relevant, please.