Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Much appreciated for the ammendment. The snottier the better right!   What I am assuming is that this response is to be posted to Gladstones? However, I am seeing some users sending this as an email instead, which is a little confusing.  If we're happy with this response, what would you suggest is the best way to send it over to them (post/email), and is there anything additional I could include (if necessary)?  Thanks again! 
    • Hi @BankFodder I've read through other threads to better inform me of the process from here onwards. When I put in the MoneyClaim it gave me a claim number and it currently says to wait for the defendant to respond, they have until 7 August.  It seems their most likely action is to extend that a further 14 days to about 21 August - this hasn't happened yet, of course, as it is only 27 July but I'm anticipating that may be the case. So when the expected defence action is taken by EVRi I will need to submit DQ with these responses A1 - no mediation B - my contact details C1 - yes to the small claims track D1 - No.  If No please state why.  I believe the defence will provide some rebuttal to the particulars of claim and so I need to include details as to why the claim requires a hearing.  Is there some certain templated text I can include here or will it vary depending on what the defendant comes back with? I see on the form it mentions the following: Relevant reasons include that there are factual disputes which will need the judge to hear from witnesses directly or the issues are so complex they need to be argued orally.  Hoping to reach out to see what may be the most effective statements for D1 reasoning. E1-5 are pretty straightforward. I want to get ahead of things and be ready to take the next step so I appreciate what advice you may have about the DQ.  Thanks!  
    • Rachel Reeves is set to reveal a public finances shortfall of billions on pounds after a snap audit.View the full article
    • Hi What they have asked in what you have highlighted isn't unusual at all as Councils have numerous different departments that deal with specific different areas within that council. So if what you are asking in your DSAR is say specific to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit, Planning Permission etc then just let them know that specific area. On the other hand if you want every bit of DATA they hold on you then simply tell then ALL DATA they hold on you it's them up to then to go through all depts to check for it. 
    • A growing number of couples are booking a content creators to capture their special day.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

creditor threat to use insolvency act


shabz25
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5045 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have received a letter today for my creditor stating that if i did not pay the £861 they will use the insolvency act to recover the money. The debt is for electrical equipment paid for in installments. can you advise me if the credit act applies to this debt, should i have received a default notice etc. Can they use the insolvency act for this amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You mention electrical equipment paid in installments...is there any kind of written agreement ? Also they can only use the insolvency act if the amount you owe is OVER £750, it might be a wise move to get the figure under the £750 mark...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

They can issue a statutary demand if the sum owned is more than £750. If you have not paid the sum, or apllied to have the demand set aside, within 21 days they could oetition for your bankrupcy.

If you can pay them the difference of £111 they cannnot issue a statutary demand in which case they cannot petition for your bankrupcy.

Bear in mind that it will cost them £1,000- £1,500 if they do try to bankrupt you and they will be at the end of the line when any assets are divided. HMRC come first, then any secured creditors such as a mortgage and possibly a secured bank overdraft. They could spend a lot to get 1p in the £.

I would try to pay the £111 if you can and then negotiate a payment plan for the balance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was no agreement, just to pay an interest free installment for 5 months. I offered to return the goos when i could not pay for them but the retailer refused. What if i bring the debt below £750 and they add interest to bring it back uip again. I cannot afford to pay a monthly installment plan because i haven't enough left to pay my creditors at the end of each month. My debts are over £140k so am having to prioritize at the moment. i will have to check but the original debt was about £600 so £200+ is made up of charges, i will have to check to make sure on this.

I could gather the £110 as a last resort to prevent them issuing a SD. What if i offer to pay the £110 but they refuse to accept it, where do i stand if this happens, do i just pay it to them anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning,

If the debt was £600 and the balance is made up of interest and penalty charges which have been applied unlawfully ( you say there is no contract) then your reason to set the SD aside would be that the debt was below the £750 threshold.

 

If you owe £140,000 and cannot meet your monthly obligations I would be inclined to write to the creditor outlining your financial position and offering a full and final settlement figure that you can afford.

 

I don't know your full financial position, you may be asset rich but cash poor, however, as I have stated above it will cost the creditor well into 4 figures to petition for your bankrupcy and by the look of it they will not see a great return on their outlay.

 

Only you know your true position and CAG generally suggests you avoid bankrupcy however with your kind of debt I am sure that you must be under great pressure. I would suggest that it is something you should look at look at for your own wellbeing.

 

Martin g

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, i want to avoid bankrupcy and save myself the sense of failure. I have no assets what so ever. I have not means to repay my debts in full. I have made some full and final payment offers to some creditors but never heard anything back from them. I can only assume the offer was too low for them. I have recently had another SD set aside successfully. I don't think it is in their interest to issue a statutory demand as they will not get anything at all, they are way down the list to get anything. Do you think it is worth writing to the DCA and telling them that making me bankrupt would not be in their interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy is still a dirty word, but nowhere as bad as it used to be. Although its still a bit of a bad stigma, most people who declare themselves, or indeed anyone who has been petitioned are usually relaesed from it within 12 months. this was introduced under The Enterprise Act 2002 I believe.

 

If you have a genuine consience and truly want to pay your debts, then why not go into an IVA. this will last for six years and once youve made the arrangement with the IVA Practitioner, youll only have to pay what you can afford. Its on your credit file for 6 years, but so is everything else, like defaults, CCJ's, the lot.

 

If as you say youve got no assets, then the liklihood that anyone will chace you with diligence is unlikely. No one in thier right mind will petition you considering what it costs them aganist what they are going to get out of you. If you got debts of 140k, you could pay 25% of that over 6 years. Thats just under 6k per annum.

 

As you have no assets, you are in a position of control. Just say to them, well look this is what Ive got, this is all you're getting - end of. If they dont like it well then tough, say petition me !! Dont tolerate crap from these bully boys, you have to take control of the reigns and make the rules.

 

SD's are abused in may ways, and to my knowledge the only creditors who will really go for Bankruptcy big time is Government depts like HMRC for example. They do it as a matter of principle, regardless of cost, just to eatch someone a lesson. Ive been told that by a friend of mine in HMRC Litigation.

 

The choice is yours to make, only you know the full extent of your problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon,

 

I obviuously don't know you, however I really think that the sensible thing for you to do is to go bankrupt. I appreciate that this may make you feel a failure but many businessmen and women who are successful today have been bankrupt in the past, or have declared a business insolvent.

In the States venture capitalists have no problem with ppeople who have been bankrupt on the basis that we learn from our mistakes.

I would suggest that you phone the National Debt Helpline who are, I beleive, sensible, non judgemental and who will give you unbiased advice.

 

Martin g

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...