Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Orange - reluctance to handle complaint over data charges allegedly incurred overseas


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4470 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

 

Any advice gratefully received.

 

I went to Barbados earlier this year with work. I incurred some call charges and was surprised to also receive £130 worth of DATA charges.

 

I have a smartphone which is capable of Wifi and 3g connectivity. Whilst I am at home I am careful to use wifi access where possible, even more so whilst in Barbados knowing the costs of overseas data.

 

The hotel had provided us with free access to their wifi network and I promptly logged on and used my phone to collect data and info relating to my business in the country.

 

So forward wind a few months and needless to say I'm shocked to have received a bill for £130 for "16mb" of data apparently downloaded in the country. I rang Orange customer services who said:

 

"If you use data over wifi you will still be charged through our network."

 

So... if this is true... Why does it not happen when I am in the UK? Are they deliberately overriding my choice of data provider in order to fleece me? Can they do this? surely if I make a concious decision to choose a cheaper provider of data access it is immoral and possibly unlawful for them to override this decision and then charge me extortionate amounts for being forced to use their connectivity?

 

I said to the customer services person that I would like a list of all the items I have allegedly downloaded as the bill merely says 16mb of data - no clarification as to what has been downloaded - no evidence that I've even done that. She said such information is not available.

 

So they've charged me £130 for something they cannot prove I've used??!

 

I have paid the balance of the outstanding bill APART from the charges I dispute and I've made my dispute clear. I have also requested a call back from someone more senior - to date I have had no contact.

 

My phone is now barred from making outgoing calls and texts which is a major inconvenience and particularly galling considered I made the effort to pay the non-disputed amount of the bill immediately.

 

 

So... what can I do now? Quite frankly I want to leave orange as they seem to have no concept of disputes, nor any respect towards their clients particularly those with a legitimate complaint.

 

Can I argue breach of contract given they've prevented my phone from functioning correctly despite the fact I've raised a dispute?

 

Bton Badger

  • Haha 1

BTONBADGER vs

 

HSBC Current Account - Settled £400 and closed acccount.

Egg Loan - Settled £106.32

 

Nat West Current Account - full resolution thanks to BCOB's. Refund of £5k unfair charges and interest plus £80 compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st thing is 1st... I'm a huge fan of your youtube pages!

 

 

Thank you! I've not done anything new for ages as I've been mostly left alone by the banking idiots now. probably flagged up in some central database as a troublemaker perhaps?! ;)

 

 

Right, now that's out of the way :p Orange have a complaints team that work with CAG, so maybe they'll be of assistance. Here is a quote from a different page

 

 

Maybe he can get to the bottom of the problems?

 

The Customer Service Adviser is wrong, data over wifi you should not incur any charge. My suspicion is this a Blackberry or Iphone. I know they have specific data needs that comes over the mobile network only, which is what you may have been charged for.

 

I have to say, £130 for 16 meg sounds far too expensive!

 

Talking brass tacks, if a complaint reached an ADR it would probably cost Orange more than £130, so following their complaints procedure set out in their "Code of practice" may yield results if the Orange Response team don't sort you out 1st!

 

Cheers for the advice will give them both a go and report back.

BTONBADGER vs

 

HSBC Current Account - Settled £400 and closed acccount.

Egg Loan - Settled £106.32

 

Nat West Current Account - full resolution thanks to BCOB's. Refund of £5k unfair charges and interest plus £80 compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, email sent. Look forward to your response.

 

BB

BTONBADGER vs

 

HSBC Current Account - Settled £400 and closed acccount.

Egg Loan - Settled £106.32

 

Nat West Current Account - full resolution thanks to BCOB's. Refund of £5k unfair charges and interest plus £80 compensation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...