Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycard - Mercers, Calder and now RMA and AIC


aidem
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Aidem and welcome to CAG.

 

Some of the advice that you refer to, [22] and [23], has been superceded after the ruling by Judge Waksman in the case Carey v HSBC at the end of last year.

 

It is now accepted that the bank can fulfil the requirements imposed by s.78 CCA1974 by sending impersonal T&C's for an a/c. This leaves them free to pursue payments and register adverse markers on your credit records.

 

However, they should still require the credit agreement itself if they want the debt enforced by court action.

 

Court action, however, is rarely taken by BC or their DCA's and they prefer to use various DCA's to pursue payment. BC are notorious for refusing to acknowledge debtors problems and have an aversion to assisting by suspending interest or by accepting reduced payments.

 

You should not assume BC have no credit agreement - they simply avoid producing them in many cases.

 

If you can't maintain the required a/c payments, you can make token payments to show goodwill. You may already have seen the selection of letters here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-bailiffs-advice/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

 

You could also ask one of the debt help bodies to help because of BC's intransigence. See here - Debt: Where to Get Help - Consumer Wiki

 

To avoid the debt spiralling with the addition of interest and charges, you need the a/c to be closed. This is probably achieved quickest by stopping all payments and refusing to communicate with the DCA's.

 

Re the home visits, see here - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/591-dca-home-visit-if-you-receive-or-are-threatened-with-a-doorstep-visit-

 

Continue to read other threads where you'll see many others are in the same position with BC.

 

:)

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

To Aidem and to Lochlisa.

 

Would you please clarify? Would I do this in response to the last set of letters from RMA and Allied Intl. DCAs for example?

 

While the a/c is still being actively pursued as a Live a/c, BC will continue to add interest and penalty charges. My hope is that BC will close the a/c if you stop paying and/or communicating with them or their DCA's. At least then they will stop adding their normal monthly interest.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Turnaround,

 

The only way to ask for a credit agreement is using the CCA request. And we know how BC and others side-step this, by sending out T&C's. :mad:

 

A SAR is a request for data held about you. It will almost never produce a credit agreement.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Turnaround,

 

The bank has no obligation to produce a credit agreement in response to a SAR, which is a request for data that they hold, not for specific documents.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to Aidem for thread hijack but I hope this is useful anyway.

 

Turnaround - Whilst you can demand to see data held that concerns you, you cannot dictate the format in which the bank (in this case) presents such data. You can ask for copy statements, for instance, but the bank does not have to supply them as long as they give you the data that the state's would show.

 

A credit agreement is not usually sent because this document is specifically covered by s.78 CCA 1974. I'm not saying it's right or fair but this is how the banks respond and the ICO and the FOS show no signs of contesting this.

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...