Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I live in a student house, with 5 tenants, unihomes is our utilities provider, who we each have a direct debit set up with and have paid each bill every month. Two letters were sent in my name by BWLegal saying I had two outstanding payments due adding up to over £3500, I have tried to contact british gas (as that is apparently our houses provider) as well as Unihomes. Nothing has helped and BWlegal are pursuing legal action if these debts are not resolved by the 1st May. What do I do? I've called Bwlegal when i bring up that the debt isnt for me and for unihomes they hang up on me. so I am stressed and do not know what to do
    • cant do either if its not in a public place or on your land. dx  
    • scared of what? you simply jumped at turnstile.... it's not a prison sentence and done very doubtfully of any criminal. exuberance of youth stupid act at very very worst it will be a warning letter if anything ever happens ..means nothing going fwd. dx          
    • Hi, everyone. I received a letter from TfL investigator/Prosecutor. The letter reads as follow:   ''Thank you for responding to our enquiry letter. Your comments will be taken into consideration when reviewing whis case and we will contact you as soon as we have reached a decision. TfL now consider prosecution against passengers who are in breach of all TfL byelaw offences and I must inform you that further legal action may be taken. TfL byelaws can be found at ... Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can assist you further.''   The letter was sent 23 days after I replied to them. Should I send another begging letter to IAP? I'm extremely scared now. Thanks all.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

need urgent help with brighthouse!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4995 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all, in a bit of a predicament, me and my husband have just separated we have quite a large bill with brighthouse that is in his name, the goods are at my property, we took off all osc and dlc some items are quite new, some say a year old and some almost paid, dont really want to send it all back were do we stand as to the goods being here but them being in my husbands name?? can they come ina nd take them etc etc? any help would be greatfully recieved, thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

to answer your question, no BH cannot come into your house and take the goods, they have to be let in ( does you Husband still have keys to the home and could let this happen?) for BH to be able to take the goods without consent they would have to get a court order

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, husband doesnt have a key any longer, the problem i have is if the goods are in my house but they are in his name and he is no longer here how do they go about recovering them? also some of the goods are no longer here ( i know we should of kept them until they paid for etc etc) so were do i stand on those goods?? can they chase me for everything etc etc?? thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing how large a bill and what items we are talking about it is difficult to give the best advice.

 

I would reccomend sending back un-essential items that are not almost paid for for a start.

 

BH cannot enter your home unless you let them. What other items do you have? Would it be possible for you to take over payments of the items you need? With the bill being a large one I would imagine that you/you're ex have been a long standing customer, would this mean you would have a pretty good relationship with the manager? Would it be possible to speak with him/her regarding the situation before it escalates to the embarrassment of door step calling? I would imagine that the manager would request a forwarding address for your husband - (it depends on how the land lies between you and he as to whether you give it of course!) he/she would be asking this obviously to chase payment of items he has but also to test the water with yourself to see if you are genuine so to speak - as you can imagine some people have tried to falsely claim this before.

 

The bottom line is that it is your husbands name on the agreements and your husbands name only - you cannot be chased for payment unless you are named on the agreement, it is his responsibility to make these payments. As to you having the items they would only be able to recover if they obtained a court order.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i used to be on the agreement and i have signed for things in the past, then it was put in joint names, and then a couple of months ago when we took out a new agreement they said they couldn't have joint names any longer and so because my husband went in store to sign the new agreement he was the one that resigned every agreement we had. i am quite concerned about the items we no longer possess and i don't know where he is, i imagine staying with relatives

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contact the store to see how the land lies with them. See what they say and then come back here with an update and to request further advice if needed. With you having been on the account previously Im not sure how that would lie - but if all the new agreements are in ex's name i would imagine that the payment still lies with him. However I would get this confirmed

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice sunshine, do you know how long it would take them to get a court order?? and would the court order be enforceable at this property if the debtor is no longer here??? as for store manager he is typical b/house employee arrogant so and so

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said Im not 100% on the court order etc - in all honesty they dont normally go that far they just chase it for 90 days, after that time elapses it will "drop off" and the store would not be able to deal with the debt because after 120 days the debt is sold to an outside agency, which means bailiffs - real ones! But as you say the agreements are in the ex's name so I would say you are pretty safe but please get official advice, perhaps via the CAB only because you have signed the original agreements too

Link to post
Share on other sites

They could issue a summons -but you would have the right and chance to defend.

But since the agreement is not in your name,a summons would need to be in your Husbands name.

In any event they would be expected to have had dialogue before issuing proceedings.

Even if they DO sell on the account or engage third party recovery,only a Court could make an order.

 

If a CCJ was issued and remained outstanding,then Bailiffs COULDF be in

structed.Thats a long way down the line.

 

Meantime,you need to put something in writing informing BH of the position.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any goods on the agreements which you were party to ?

 

Can you say how those goods (where payment remains outstanding) have been disposed of ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

reg conntact details for brighthouse (cavendish finance) 01923 488 200 director Joseph leo mckee (7 directors resigned in last few years why ???)company has 74 million in bank overdrafts and loans in 2008 thay had a 5 million credit in 2010 only 1.5 million credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...