Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand what you mean. But consider that part of the problem, and the frustration of those trying to help, is the way that questions are asked without context and without straight facts. A lot of effort was wasted discussing as a consumer issue before it was mentioned that the property was BTL. I don't think we have your history with this property. Were you the freehold owner prior to this split? Did you buy the leasehold of one half? From a family member? How was that funded (earlier loan?). How long ago was it split? Have either of the leasehold halves changed hands since? I'm wondering if the split and the leashold/freehold arrangements were set up in a way that was OK when everyone was everyone was connected. But a way that makes the leasehold virtually unsaleable to an unrelated party.
    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CapQuest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5029 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes Capquest have to deal with your request for the CCA, as for the Subject Acess re Egg, I sent them one last year, they cahsed the postal order but did not send the Subject Access request. Let me know if you receive yours.

 

The Legal Action paragraph is incorrect, It is my understanding that Capquest (or any dca acting on behalf of a creditor) do not need to own the debt to issue the legal proceedings, I would remove that part as it is too contentious.

  • Haha 1

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can take you to court when they like, if they choose to do so without an enforceable credit agreement in place then that is their choice and they run the risk of their action not getting off the ground.

 

I sent Egg the subject access whilst the debt was being collected by a dca, I sent the DCA a cca at the same time, it took the dca 3 months to provide the cca but in my opinion it was 'knocked up' as neither my signature or the dates corresponded. At that point I wrote the dca a letter stating that I would not be paying them any further and that I considered their collection activities inappropriate, particularly the threatening tones they used when I missed payments.

 

It got passed back to egg, who in turn have on several occasions contacted me with a view to paying them but as of yet they have not provided the subject access and as such no further payments have been made to them. At the same time as this they have manipulated my credit file by adding false information to it by extending the default date by a year...it had just dropped off my file but it is now there again. I'm on the case with Egg and from all angles, data commissioner, office of fair trading, credit ref agencies and egg management....I do not intend to let go until I achieve a resolution that is wholly satisfactory to me.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 12 days used to be followed by it being an offence if they did not produce it within the prescribed timetable...the offence part has since been dropped but they should still (but rarely do) work within the timetable...as once they're out of time the account technically goes into dispute at which point you can if you so wish withold further payments to them. That is the general idea anyway.

 

You can get a free report via a free monthns trial with experian...no fee required etc...just be sure to cancel it before it expires or they'll charge your card for the next month - Link below

 

http://www.experian.co.uk/experianhome/?sc=410006&bcd=googlsearchlp1110609

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interest I think should be halted at the point the account goes into dispute, however to charge interest in the first place the original credit agreement should have provisions in it for say a 3rd party (dca) to add interest in the event of non payment post the default/termination...Most agreements do not have this provision and thus any charges added are incorrect....and so it goes on.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't but they appear to think they can (in my case)

 

What your credit file won't show is the loan account number/credit card etc....but if you phone experian and quote your credit report (usually the date it was raised) they should be able to give you the loan account number...this may help in the event of them attempting to change/mess with the default date etc...

 

From my experience egg do not charge interest once the account hits the default/termination point....but this is my own experience, others may have a different story to tell.

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't stop paying them out of spite but what I would do is write to them again and enclosing a copy of their letter (s) where they refuse to your request for a credit agreement and at the same time tell them that due to their refusal to acknowledge your request for a credit agreement that you consider their actions irresponsible and no furter payment/communication will take place. Or words similar...they don't want to talk to you then you don't want to talk to them and I really don't think a judge would feel any different should they try to take you to court. Send your letter recorded so as to prove you've sent it etc..

 

At the same time as this report them to the OFT

I reside in Dawlish Warren but am not a rabbit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...