Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

RyanAir DENIED Boarding due to luggage size and lack of means to pay for it


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5075 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Re Post 11...............

 

I travel with Ryanair regularly and have NEVER had my hand luggage checked. Just walked through onto the flight after security.

 

Its one thing to ask a customer to pay extra charges for overweight baggage but completley another to not provide the facilities to do so !

 

I think someone needs to lighten up on this thread and its not a certain worm !:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When checking website it states 'fee not available online' for excess baggage but also states 'Fee can be purchased at our Airport Ticket Desk'.

 

So one would ask the question again.....do theynot have to facilitate a 'purchase' system at the Airport Ticket Desk ?

 

One awaits a reply......

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If, as you say, this is a [problem] then why would not offer support and advice (no matter how limited) instead of writing this person off and telling them they have no chance ?

 

How often have you been on a flight and the 'Captain of the Ship' checked your baggage ? Not very often one would sumise.

 

Your sarcasim knows no bounds re: lighten up :rolleyes: but saying that what else would I expect from a MAN with a 'back-pack' !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually looked to see the rates for overweight to see just how much overweight she was rather than looking at 'we reserve the right ........'.

 

Surely this person has come here to ask a reasonable question and it is not unreasonable for them to expect a reasonable answer if that is possible rather than some halfwit trying to confuse matters trying to show their alledged knowledge.

 

As said earlier 'lighten up'

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...