Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good luck with that. Most leases don't even follow the majority of the 2002 regulations (too old) let alone the new one. The £250 cap needs to be placed in the lease through a deed of variation and good luck getting freeholders to agree to that. It's not just some magical thing that just caps it one day. Some freeholders are only reducing them through lease extensions at massive costs (essentially buying out the difference in ground rent) and if you're doing that you might as well extend on a peppercorn anyway.
    • Yeah, I would confirm that anyway, as there is a separate sheet where I have to put in those details and my insurance number and driving licence number. That is on page 2 (page one is their allegations) then page three is a statement that you weren't the driver and space to give details who was driving. Page 4 is an empty sheet for a statement to explain the situation. So I will fill out my details as the driver on page 2, admitting I was driving at the time, and then attach my statement as above as a separate sheet. That should hopefully do it at this stage
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Seems OK, except that you must provide your details (as the driver). Include your name, address, DOB and driving licence number. This is to comply with s172 of the Road Traffic Act. Keep a copy and get a free Certificate of Posting from the Post Office.
    • Dear all, some information/advice required please.   I recently received a Further Steps Notice about a fine from 19/03/2018 which I knew nothing about. It was regarding a vehicle parked on the street without tax ( It was covered up and there because the only key to it had been stolen, I had been away from home  and I was having trouble getting a new key cut and coded to the vehicle )  I had not made a change of address to DVLA which would be why I knew nothing about the fine until receiving the final steps notice dated 29th April 2024 and giving me 10 working days to pay, although the notice did not arrive till May 9th 2024. I emailed the London Collection and Compliance Centre on May 13th 2024 asking for any information and they sent me a copy of the original fine. It is for  £390 back vehicle tax, £85 cost and £600 fine.  I now have received a Notice of Enforcement dated 7th June 2024 demanding payment ( total £1036)  or an arrangement by 6am 15th June ( tomorrow )  My question is is it tool late now to question the £600 fine part of the total amount to be paid ? That amount seems punitive.  Would making a statuary declaration regarding having no knowledge of the original court date apply ? And any other advice gratefully received. I am on Universal Credit and apparently they have already taken £177 via benefit reductions which I wasn’t aware of, but does make it seem strange that they were also unable to contact me.    Many thanks for any assistance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Used car trouble


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Contacted the court today, they said the defendant had put in their application to have the judgment set aside but wouldnt tell me the reasons, said i would recieve a letter shortly with a copy of the application attatched, but did tell me a hearing date to look at the application had been set for nov 1st 2010, so another 6 weeks hanging around.

Will update when i get the letter, letting you's know the defendants reasons for asking for the judgment to be set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hers's the latest

this is what the defendant has written on form n244 asking for judgment to be set aside

" i wish to apply for judgment to be set aside because we disagree the outstanding debt stated on warrant and previous hearing nothing re proceedings"

Also they have added this

vechicle invoice

previous judgment order

i will bring document with me to the hearing, we still havent had return of vechicle re judgment.

 

I have sent copies of the 3 letters fao the judge sitting on nov 1st , showing that i was asking the defendant to contact me to make arrangements to collect the car, warning it would otherwise be disposed of, all were sent by recorded delivery to the defendant and all were signed for, they never responded to any of my letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well, todays the day the judge will look at the defendants application to have judgment set aside. Im hoping he will throw this out as i think they are just using delaying tactics. I cant attend court, but have sent a letter giving my reasons as to why i object to their request. Ive also sent to the court copies of the letters where i asked the defendant to contact me so they coud arrange to pick up the car, which they didnt do, and a copy of the certificate which shows the car was disposed of. Gotta wait again now to see what the judge decides, will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mmm, pity you can't attend because it can make a difference. Good luck in any event!

 

Please Note

 

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Bailiffs have made contact with the defendants again, collected some money this week from them but have given them 3wks to pay the outstanding amount. I spoke to the bailiff who said he will be calling on the defendant for the next 3 mondays to recover £300 on each visit. He has told the defendant if he fails on any payments that he will take goods from him and said he has left the defendant under no illusions that this will happen and has told him there is a lot of goods that he can and will take if he defaults. I will still be naming the defendants when all monies have been collected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So far so good. Bailiffs have been in 3 times so far and collected money. Should have called in yesterday for the last collection, will hear about this in 2-3 days time, so hopefully this is now at an end at long last. The place i bought the car from was Kcarz in Eye, Peterborough. They also sell used cars on Ebay. Ive had a bad experience with them, but im in no way implying you will have the same troubles ive had. I now have another used car, bought at Faenol Garage in Nth Wales and i couldnt be happier with it, or the service ive recieved. I cant commend them highly enough. Great service and great people to deal with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally had confirmation from the bailiffs that they have now collected all Monies due from the defendants. Its been a long process, but so glad i took this route. I hope in future, anyone who has dealings with Kcarz will be better treated than i was. If they had have refunded me in the first place this action could have been avoided and been over and done with in april 2010, instead, their attitude was "do want you want".

They have now had to refund me in full for the faulty and falsely advertised car, which i had scrapped when they wouldnt collect it, also for all out of pocket expenses ( hire car ) and they lost another £75 when they tried to have the judgment set aside and failed, also any costs involving the bailiffs carrying out their job to recover the money.

It can take sometime from start to finish, but would advise anyone who knows they have a good case not to be worried or afraid to go to the small claims court to recover their money. I took no legal advice from anywhere, and just went for it, thankfully all turned out good in the END.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Macatac

 

Thanks for your reply on my thread.

 

Was the main problem with your car the head gasket?

 

My seller is telling me (rather aggressively) that if my problem is head gasket then this comes under 'fair wear and tear' and would not be his responsibility. He is refusing to believe the diagnostic report from a main dealer stating that there is a problem with the piston rings and is telling me it is head gasket and nothing to do with him. Sorry, but i am far more inclined to believe someone who has looked at my car for half a day over him who hasn't even lifted the bonnet!

 

If amazingly it does turn out to be just head gasket (which seller is going to test for on Saturday) and seller tries to get rid of me on 'fair wear and tear' grounds...is he right? Or can i still fight that head gasket comes under 'not fit for purpose'?

 

Initially reported the problem to seller 2 months after buying the car.

 

Thanks

Minxa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi Macatac, I'm so happy you won your case and received your money back, I'm going through the same issue with these fraudsters, they are ignoring my letters and I'm at the end of my tether!

 

I would really appreciate it if you could PM me your email address so we could talk some more and i can take some advice from you with getting my money back from I KCarz.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Hi Macatac, I'm so happy you won your case and received your money back, I'm going through the same issue with these fraudsters, they are ignoring my letters and I'm at the end of my tether!

 

I would really appreciate it if you could PM me your email address so we could talk some more and i can take some advice from you with getting my money back from I KCarz.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ted

hello ted - did you get it sorted in the end?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...