Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • mkmkmk, please start a new thread of your own and we'll advise you. This thread is for Wen9821. HB
    • Met are out of order in this new version of their PCN. They show your car arriving and leaving via the ANPR cameras. They then go on to describe this as the parking period knowing full well that since your car still has to drive to a parking space and later drive from the parking space to the exit. How this can be described as a parking period with so much driving involved is beyond me.    
    • I have a similar issue, I was caught shoplifting in M&S last fortnight (which I'm ashamed of) and I received a letter from DWF with the £125 fine and the price of the goods. I've paid the money. The police were not called, but a police letter was sent to a presumed suspect. Will this letter affect the options I choose when applying for a visa (I checked many posts and found no one who has received a similar letter). Is it all over after paying the money? I'm so anxious about it all!
    • I used to go to the Sainsbury's in the Cromwell Road London and my wife used to get PCNs there. I just spoke to a manage onsite and they were good enough to get them cancelled. If you take in the PCN , they photograph it and that is the end of it. Which is what should happen with major companies when their customers are ripped off by the rogues. Are you listening Mcdonalds and Starbucks?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

New Policy by (sh)Abbey? - refund with just a phone call


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wrote letter to MD back in April 2006. Got standard two fingered reply back saying effectively " dare you to take us to Court then" and by the way we'll close your account out of spite. Pondered this and set up fall back account just in case.

 

Finally got round to starting online Court Claim yesterday. Decided to ring Abbey just to tell them I was going ahead with Court and where they would like documents sent (well, OK I wanted to rub there noses in it a bit) and remind them of BBA policy on closing accounts out of spite.

 

Got through to customer complaints, gave her my reference no. Explained situation and had Court Claim online in front of me. Was asked if only claiming for £105 (3x£35 DD non payment) replied yes though I would claim interest, fees and time through court. Rest of conversation as follows;

 

CS "Well I can credit your account with the £105 now"

ME (shocked pause) "And you will take no unilateral action as far as my account is concerned"

CS "No everything will be carry on as before"

ME "Fine, i'll accept that"

CS "Transferring the £105 now... Ok that's gone through and will show on your next statement."

 

So there you go. This and other fine sites are having there effect. Could be that Abbey have delegated a limit to CCS staff just to stop all Court cases. So surprised that they rolled over I forgot to ask for interest (only £4 though).

 

Now where are those NatWest and Nationwide bank statements.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't expect it to be quite as easy as that if you're claiming £1000 though.

 

However, it might be a new policy. Abbey knows it can't win these cases and it might be becoming resigned to the fact that to fight the claims simply costs more money anyway - better to pay it back before you get no option.

 

I very much doubt it though - the floodgates would open.

Abbey - Won DPA Claim - Aug 06 and got bailiffs in to recover my court costs of just £30.00

Abbey - Won Charges Refund of £1050 - Nov 06

Egg - Recovered £220 due to Customer Services misinformation - Feb 2007

Nat West - Prelinimary Letter to recover on Credit Card charges £30.00 sent March 2006. £25.40 offered - rejected and the bank reckons that this is it's last word on the matter. We'll see if that's still the case when it reads my N1 form sent recently. It has until the 17th April to respond or the N1 will be submitted.

 

Please check out my web site www.BankChargesScandal.co.uk for Research, Useful links and my story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wold add that if you have large charges and have had lots of problems as a result of those charges, then you have the option to claim interst from you in the same way they charge you interest.

 

Of course its all an individuals choice, but personally I have had big financial problems exacerbated by the charges imposed by the bans and cc companies, and I think i deserve the interest.

 

JMHO

 

Glenn

Kick the shAbbey Habit

 

Where were you? Next time please

 

 

Abbey 1st claim -Charges repaid, default removed, interest paid (8% apr) costs paid, Abbey peed off; priceless

Abbey 2nd claim, two Accs - claim issued 30-03-07

Barclaycard - Settled cheque received

Egg 2 accounts ID sent 29/07

Co-op Claim issued 30-03-07

GE Capital (Store Cards) ICO says theyve been naughty

MBNA - Settled in Full

GE Capital (1st National) Settled

Lombard Bank - SAR sent 16.02.07

MBNA are not your friends, they will settle but you need to make sure its on your terms -read here

Glenn Vs MBNA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Felt really encouraged by your post gerryb2. I have an account which only goes back just over 2 years. Have done the intial request for details of charges and received 24 individual letters, each enclosing a statement and two seperate advertising leaflets!

No wonder their charges are so high!!! Today I received my first computer printed details and presume will receive several more in the next few days. Anyway, my charges only add up to about £250 altogether (which seems reasonably low compared to some) so, from what you have said, I reckon it might be worth a phone call to see if they'll refund them fairly quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...