Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • “Not realising it was a no parking zone” doesn’t help you if the timing is correct, as (at least, on Google Maps / View) there is clear signage ('7am to midnight', parked at 15:22) What might be worth pursuing is the "ticket handed to driver" aspect : do you have any view on why they would be  stating that?
    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

When i claim my costs - Help needed


paulminize
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6505 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all i am sending of Prelims today to some of the banks, my question is this, i know when i get to the court stage i can claim back reasonable costs - i seen a post somewhere explaining exactly what i could claim, aslo the rates.

I was just wondering is this written anywhere officially, the reason is, i am warning them in my prelim that i will be charging for letters etc, and including the costs with the prelim so thay can see they are fair and they have been prewarned.

 

I am including a paragraph to the effects that if they comply fully within 14 days as a gesture of good will, i will waive current recovery costs, however should the debt still be outstanding, and require any further communication from myself, these cost would be recoverable under >>>>> ........Section? Law ?

 

Please help

Me

HSBC: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First statments 21/08

Capital One: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First Statements XX/08

MBNA: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First Statements XX/08

G.E Money (BurtonCard): DPASAR 09/08 - No Reply

Citi Bank: DPASAR 08/08 - Requested more personal info 10/08 - Sent 10/08

RBoS: DPASAR 07/08 - Standard Reply XX/08

HSBC (Credit Card): DPASAR XX/08

 

Partner

Argos: DPASAR 10/08 - Screen Prints XX/08 - Prelim 17/08

New Look: DPASAR 09/08 - No Reply

Abbey Nat: DPASAR 10/08 - Requested more personal info - Sent XX/08

 

Mom

Barclay Card: DPASAR 17/08 -

Capital One: DPASAR 18/08 -

L.P.F: DPASAR 18/08 -

Lloyds TSB: DPASAR 17/08 -

Monument: DPASAR 17/08 -

Sainsbury's Credit Card: DPASAR 17/08 -

 

Partners Mom

Studio: Prelim

Allders: Prelim

 

Partners Sis

NatWest: DPASAR 22/08

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can claim interest for the period that the bank has had your money. This is at the Court rate, 8%, or the contract rate, which is whatever rate relates to the contract you had with your bank. Basically, it's the rate they charge you for borrowing from them or having an unauthorised overdraft, for instance.

 

You also need to make sure that you claim back any interest thay have had off you if you have been overdrawn due to their unlawful charges. For instance, if you had a £0.00 balance and a charge of £25 has gone out then you will be £25 overdrawn This is an amount that they will be charging interest on so you need to claim that back as well.

 

The scheme of things is basically to add up the charges, work out any interest you have been charged due to the charges and add that on, then add on interest to compensate for the fact that you have been without the use of your money for however long it has been.

 

I think it's a good gesture to say that you wont apply the actual recovery costs if they settle quickly. If it gets as far as Court then it goes to show that you have been reasonable and were eager to settle the matter quickly with the minium of fuss and expense.

 

You could also point out that you have a very solid case (no one has ever lost and no bank has even defended the penalty charges in Court) and procrastinating and incuring extra costs over something they are almost certainly going to loose may mean that they are failing in their duty of care to use their shareholders money sensibly and to operate the company in a lawful manner.

 

P.

Northern Rock; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered. Recieved details of 6 yrs charges on 8th. Wrote back asking whether or not they hold information going back further than that.

MBNA; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered 14/8/06

Barclays; S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request sent 11/8/06 - Del 14/8/06

Diners Club; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered 14/8/06. Recieved form to fill and return with fee on 17/8/06. Sent form back, delivered 4/9/06.

Intelligent Finance; Prelim letter emailed 16/08/06, claiming £318. Email recieved from "Anne-Marie" 17/8/06 saying my email has been passed to Customer Relations dept. Fob-off letter received 23/8/06, letter sent in return same day - Delivered 24/8/6 Recieved letter offer 25% settelement - refused - LBA sent. MCOL on 10th revcieved notification that they intend to defend on 13th. 06/9/2006 WON!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the reply, however i understand all of the interest thing, it was just the bit about other costs, i know they are reclaimable at court but where, who says this. I just want the letter to read right and factual.

 

Paul

Me

HSBC: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First statments 21/08

Capital One: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First Statements XX/08

MBNA: DPASAR 08/08 - Standard Reply XX/08 - First Statements XX/08

G.E Money (BurtonCard): DPASAR 09/08 - No Reply

Citi Bank: DPASAR 08/08 - Requested more personal info 10/08 - Sent 10/08

RBoS: DPASAR 07/08 - Standard Reply XX/08

HSBC (Credit Card): DPASAR XX/08

 

Partner

Argos: DPASAR 10/08 - Screen Prints XX/08 - Prelim 17/08

New Look: DPASAR 09/08 - No Reply

Abbey Nat: DPASAR 10/08 - Requested more personal info - Sent XX/08

 

Mom

Barclay Card: DPASAR 17/08 -

Capital One: DPASAR 18/08 -

L.P.F: DPASAR 18/08 -

Lloyds TSB: DPASAR 17/08 -

Monument: DPASAR 17/08 -

Sainsbury's Credit Card: DPASAR 17/08 -

 

Partners Mom

Studio: Prelim

Allders: Prelim

 

Partners Sis

NatWest: DPASAR 22/08

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what the actual legislation would be, or if there is any - it could all just be common law - but the principle of going to Court is to put you in the situation you would have been in had your money hot have been unlawfully taken from you. As far as is possible anyway.

 

You can claim for your letters and time because you are only needing to go to these lengths because of the banks unlawful actions. The small claims Court is reasonably informal and you won't need to quote chapter and verse at the judge when setting out your losses because he will know it anyway and, as long as what you are asking for is reasonable and represents actual loss to you, then I can't see there being a problem.

 

P.

Northern Rock; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered. Recieved details of 6 yrs charges on 8th. Wrote back asking whether or not they hold information going back further than that.

MBNA; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered 14/8/06

Barclays; S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) request sent 11/8/06 - Del 14/8/06

Diners Club; S.A.R sent 11/8/06 - Delivered 14/8/06. Recieved form to fill and return with fee on 17/8/06. Sent form back, delivered 4/9/06.

Intelligent Finance; Prelim letter emailed 16/08/06, claiming £318. Email recieved from "Anne-Marie" 17/8/06 saying my email has been passed to Customer Relations dept. Fob-off letter received 23/8/06, letter sent in return same day - Delivered 24/8/6 Recieved letter offer 25% settelement - refused - LBA sent. MCOL on 10th revcieved notification that they intend to defend on 13th. 06/9/2006 WON!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...