Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fraud in Citi's Internet Banking


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5196 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All Cagers,

Perhaps you can help me?

 

 

I have come on to the General section because there are so few contributors to Citi Banking.

 

 

My problem is that I today discovered that yesterday it would appear,

some one managed to hack into my online current account and transfer out of it nearly £1,000.

This will have inevitable consequences in that I will not be able to pay direct debits or regular creditors,

resulting in charges no doubt from Citi and various creditors!

 

 

I have advised Citi,

I think they must use sub continent call centres, I could hardly understand what they were saying

, both operatives and team leaders.

 

 

However the account has been suspended cards revoked etc and the matter referred to Citi's fraud department.

 

 

I have also advised local police.

 

Is there anything I can do at this stage to head off charges that will inevitably be charged to myself?

 

 

 

 

Has anyone else experienced this problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot speak for Citi, but this happened to me at Natwest and HSBC and they were excellent, refunded everything very quickly, no charges.

 

They should not charge you, I would try not to worry about what has not happened.

 

I do not even know Citi did normal banking, I see all their branches are in London, can you pop in and see them?

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GuidoT

Thank you for your kind and prompt reply. You are quite correct in that most if not all branches are in London unfortunately I live 130 miles away in Walesb but can get there if necessary Canary Wharf. This is first time that this has happened to me, Citi as you can guess weren't particularly helpful on the phone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Mate,

 

As a way of making sure you don't get fobbed off I would flinig the book at them at the first hint of them not being helpful - i.e. they send a letter [ignore what they say on the phone as they can just deny it] saying they will impose charges, no refund etc.

 

Mate had a similar problem with llolyds, still have not got a straight answer out of them as to how it happened and what theyhave done to track down the perp - even though the second time [yes it happened twice] someone paid off a bill!!!

 

If you can for the day or so around when this happened, note down your movements and computer usage - this is to show you could not have done this.

 

Step 1- ask for written confirmation of their stance and a clear and full explanation of why, spell out you want the names of those making this decision.

 

Step 2- send in a SAR, specifically stating you want the records showing the internet records of said transactions and times.

 

Step 3- ask for the details of who they are comunicating this with in the police force as this was a crime. I would start getting suspicious if they say nothing to this request.

 

Step 4- Specifically Ask for details of whether the same internet connections were used in any other crime - if you got hacked, probably others did so it wasn't you losing/giving away your account details which seems to be favorite tactic banks use to deny liability with regards to Chip N Pin.

 

If they say that it is impossible for accounts to be hacked, do a search on the internet, there was one story on the teregister.co.uk about the head internet editor at the washington post investigating 2 banking account hacks.

 

Personally, I do not do intenet banking, if I did I would do as the washington post editor above does, do not use Windows, use a Linux LIVE CD, it leaves no footprints on the HDD, so no information is available to a hacker nor can trojans get anything.

 

Here's the article:

 

Security Fix - Avoid Windows Malware: Bank on a Live CD

 

Laters

Edited by Gazza01
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gazza01,

Thank you for your most helpful response mate. I'm only too sorry that it happened to you more than once. Citi's reaction has been quite strange, but I must give them credit for making " Temporary Credit Pending Investigation", within 3 days of my reporting the loss. What of course they didn't do was honour Direct Debits and although they issued new debit card, pins etc left it all deactivated as the matter was under investigation!. So having informed them beforehand of liable charges if this occurred, they took no notice. Although they have now said (over the phone), they will reimburse charges, provided proof of such charges, is sent to them. I personally think that they can communicate with those organisations concerned and advise them of the circumstances. What is interesting is that fraud in internet banking would appear to be a lot more common than the banks are letting on! There seems to be no common procedure agreed by the British Banking Association, OFT, FSA or FOS in dealing with this situation.

 

Cheers mate thanks for your contribution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...