Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Served With Statutory demand - help please


RwArms78
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5262 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I am looking for some help.

 

In Apr 1998 I defaulted on a Hailifax Current Account owing approx £2000. I believe I may have got a CCJ for this, I cant recall if the CCJ was for the account or a personal loan. I moved house many times and lost touch with the creditor

 

Approx 6 Months ago I registered on Creditexpert.co.uk in order to view my credit file.

 

Shortly after I started recieving letters from Capquest about this debt.

 

I have a mortgage with my wife for a new build house, its an interest only mortgage. Me & My wife were both redundant from Barclays in september

 

Today as my parents were coming into our house a gentleman asked for me and tried to hand me a letter, I refused this letter and did not tell him my name. I closed the door and he drove away leaving the letter on my doorstep ( even though door was closed )

 

this letter is a Statutory Demand under section 268(1) of the insolvency act 1986.

 

The letter gives the amount in excess of £3000 including interest accrued, it says the debt is unsecured. the demand was dated 24th December.

 

The debt was assigned to capquest Apr 2006

 

I really dont understand the rest of this letter, It does not give you anything in plain english so i would ask for some help.

 

can anyone tell me what i should do ? what is the consequences of this letter ? was he right to leave it outside on my doorstep ?

 

any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you last make a payment or make a written acknowledgement on this account?

 

Cheers.

UF

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may be helpful to some of the experts on here if you could scan and post up the letter so they can read it fully, remembering to remove all identifying information.

What did the CF check show up as regards defaults.

Also DCA's leaving personal identifying documents on your doorstep is definately unaceptable and a breach of the Data Protection Act

Edited by boswell
typo--again

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

credit file showed the default in 1998. i will try to find a friend with a scanner but it may take me a while.

 

It would also be important to know if the default was for your Loan or Current Account.

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. If you last made a payment in 2003 then this debt would be statute barred by the Limitation Act 1980.

 

If this is the case then you can apply to the County Court to have this statutory demand set aside. I have done this in the past.

 

I'll dig out the paperwork and post it up for you so that if this is the case then you can inform the organisation that served this stat demand on you that you have applied to the court to have this set aside. Then put them to strict proof that the statutory demand is not statute barred.

 

Unless of course they did have a CCJ, in which case they would have to explain to the court why they have taken so long to act upon it. It really is important when you last made a payment and whether they have obtained a CCJ or not.

 

I've only done this once in the past, but other members who are more versed in this will be along shortly.

 

Cheers.

UF

Edited by UnitedFront

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the thread where we applied to have a statutory demand set aside:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/162489-statutory-demand-stature-barred.html

 

All of the forms you need were posted by 42man with all information.

 

But wait because more experienced members will surely be along soon.

Edited by UnitedFront

I am rarely around these parts any more. I only stop by when something has come to my attention that has sufficiently annoyed me so as to persuade me to awake from my nap and put in my two pence.

 

I am a final year law student; I am NOT an expert in law. All of my posts are just my opinion. I cannot be held responsible for any outcome whatsoever resulting from any person following the opinions or information contained within my posts. Always seek professional legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. If you last made a payment in 2003 then this debt would be statute barred by the Limitation Act 1980.

 

Thats exactly what i was working towards, seeing there was a Default in 98 and no contact since 2003

If I have been helpful please tickle my scales or better still contribute to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks

 

i have downloaded the forms.

 

should i write to them first and ask for a copy of the original agreement ??

 

or do i just complete the forms and state i believe the debt to be statute barred ?

 

with the affidavit, do i need to attend a solicitors to complete that ?

 

just out of curiosity , did he serve the document correctly by leaving on my doorstep outside my door ?

 

thanks again

 

Rob

Edited by RwArms78
Link to post
Share on other sites

What was your credit report like when you viewed it.

If there was a recent CCJ, it would show. If they got one more than 6 years ago, it will have dropped off by now and as has been said, they would have some explaining to do as to why it was not enforced sooner.

Of course I will pay you everything you say I owe with no proof.

Oooh Look....Flying Pigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest are well known for sending out stat demands especially so for statute barred debts....you will find plenty of threads here - DCA Legal Successes - The Consumer Forums Capquest are hoping that you will be frightened into paying, using the Insolvency Service as a tool for debt collection is frowned upon...what makes it worse is that Capquest know full well the debt is probably statute barred.....it is appalling behaviour on their part and the OFT are gathering quite a large file on this company at the moment. I URGE YOU TO TELL THE OFT !!.. You must get this set aside within 18 days of the date it was served upon you....use forms 6.4 (set aside) and 6.5 (affadavit)....check the demand first....does it state your nearest court ? if it does just check here to find out if your local court handles bankruptcies / insolvencies - Her Majesty's Courts Service - Court Information and Addresses Also check it has the name of a person you can speak to DIRECTLY on it as well as a number....

 

A statutory demand must show a named person or persons from the Creditor or their agent/solicitor whom you can contact directly. This is Rule 6.2 of The insolvency Rules 1986.

 

This means that if the statutory demand doesn't give the name of a person you can speak to then it is not valid. If you try to contact the named person and they won’t put you through then it is also invalid. I suggest you try the number 3 times, ask for the contact name (Barry is it ?) if they won't put you through then you can write this on the affadavit, if they do put you through (highly unlikely) then just state you will be applying to set the case aside and claim your full costs back in court....

 

This thread gives you some information on how to fill out the 6.4 - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/162489-statutory-demand-stature-barred-2.html#post1749288

 

Once you have filled out the stat demand, then what you will need to do is take it to the local court (let us know if it is the correct court - as I mentioned above you have to check if they handle bankruptcies as not all county courts do and mistakes have been made where the solicitor puts the wrong court on the demand and it is an abuse of process....

 

Once at the court, you take the original demand with you along with your 6.4 and 6.5 and ask the court to swear them in along with any other documentation, CCA request perhaps ? It might also be worth sending this letter recorded too - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/599-letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

 

Once you have submitted all the paperwork to the court (take copies) then you should wait for a date to see the judge who in all probability and with all the cases I have seen on here throw it out...Capquest are not likely to turn up...and you claim your costs against them,...

 

If you need help shout...

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they had a CCJ, they wouldn't need to issue an SD - they would simply go for enforcement. You need the 'prove it' letter first, and ask for copies of any notice of assignment etc (if not yet received). Send these to Capquest - it will let them know you mean business. If it was a loan, then a CCA request would be in order. There's no CCA for a current account.

 

In the meantime, you must apply for a set aside.

 

It may be worth sending a subject access request to the original creditor - this will show when you last acknowledged the account, hopefully, but could take 40 days. Do you have any of your own records which would show this?

 

As mentioned, it's dangerous to claim SB if you are unsure of the timings, as it might otherwise count as an acknowledgment of the alleged debt.

 

What did the letters from Capquest say? Any notice of assignment?

 

I'm alarmed that the SD is dated 24 December - technically you're already out of time, but the service date can certainly be challenged. At least you have witnesses to the actual date of service.

 

If they go for the SD based on that date, it will cause you short-term trouble but can be fairly easily overcome - and would add to any complaint. You should also win costs!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately Donkey, getting a CCJ first followed by a stat demand is actually the correct way to go about it !! I have seen high court law where they throw out a stat demand BECAUSE it hasn't been secured previously (although it usually applies to companies as opposed to personal debts)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately Donkey, getting a CCJ first followed by a stat demand is actually the correct way to go about it !! I have seen high court law where they throw out a stat demand BECAUSE it hasn't been secured previously (although it usually applies to companies as opposed to personal debts)

 

Blimey! I never knew that! Thanks for the lesson!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok forms were lodged today, i also found out that the county court had moved 5 years ago and the address on the demand was the crown court. i went along to the correct court and lodged the documents, i also added to the affidavit stating i would ask the court to consider abuse of process

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...