Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice needed- money taken without permission


jimmyk83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5302 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I had an account with JBDR in Glasgow. I was due to get a loan through on the Friday, however it didnt go through, so i spoke to JBDR and gave them my card details (foolishly), and they said theyd put it through on Monday.

 

The loan still hadnt cleared by Monday, so they phoned me back and said it had been declined. I apologised and said it should be there by the Tuesday. He said that was no good and if i didnt pay by 4pm that day (monday), the account would be defaulted. I made no further paymnet arrangement, and did not give them any instructions to take payment with my card

 

I phoned up on tuesday to make the payment and was offered a settlement of £401, which i decided to take. Only later did i discover that a few hours earlier they had taken a payment of £200 with my debit card, without my permission, and they did not tell me this when i spoke to them on my phone.

 

Is there anything i can do about this? The £200 less in my account has left me shafted for some important bills. Can they get away with taking money from my account without my explicit permission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they cannot take money out of your bank account without your permission.The first thing you need to do is get your card changed so they cannot do it again. Get in touch with your bank and tell them the money was taken without your permission and you want it refunded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well your bank is out of order. Does that mean if a thief stole your details there would be no refund on the grounds you must have given them your details sometime? You may have given them your details for a future transaction yet to be determined but you did not authorise the payment they took. I would demand to see the bank manager and kick up a stink about the bank making an unauthorised payment. They should refund your money and get the money back from the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct, although the bank is technically right also as you did enable access to your account by providing account details. Best thing is to ensure the bank refuse any future requests for payment from JBDR, if they then do it's their fault and absolves you of further liability. Save your time as the bank have not actually done anything wrong and although you may claim it was without permission the banks defence will always be "Well why did you give them your details?". Yes it sucks but thats banks for you.

 

Spend your time principally on JBDR as this is the direct source of difficulty.

 

Can you elaborate a little? You say £401 was offered as a settlement figure by them, was this a full and final figure to settle this account or the amount they would accept this month? Also, do you have anything in writing (guess not but have to ask).

 

You say JBDR had already taken £200 and you then made another payment of £401. Have you actually paid them £601? What is your contractual obligation regarding payment? What type of agreement is it also? Lot's of questions but will all help to get to the bottom of what they've been up to ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the £401 was a full and final settlement.

No, nothing in writing from JBDR

Yes, total payment made on tuesday was £601 (obviously i wouldnt have paid the £401 if id known the £200 had been taken)

 

Sorry but im not sure exactly what you mean with the last 2 questions. I had no agreed payment plan with them. The £200 was supposed to be the initial payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jimmy,

No problem, was asking if the payment they wanted from you was part of a formal agreement in writing etc. Just keen to see that you are not being taken advantage of.

 

You say the £401 was a full and final payment but then say the £200 was supposed to be an initial payment, suggesting it was an intermediary or first payment. Just trying to be clear on whats happened. Have you sent them a CCA request to check the debt you are paying is all legitimate etc?

 

You write there is no agreed payment plan with them? Just wondering what the arrangement is as we need to understand it in order to put together a considered request for them to give it back to you. Technically speaking if there is no formal agreement but you owe xyz amount they could just claim you willingly offered it to them as an extra payment to clear a debt total. Appreciate I'm playing devils advocate but need to deal with it objectively in order to make the right moves.

 

Of course I may be complicating matters as you also said the £401 was a full and final payment suggesting the account is in fact now clear. If that's the case then sure, the £200 extra they've had is not owed and we can take steps to get that back to you asap. Is that the case, is it that simple?

 

Apologies for any vagueness here, sometimes hard to understand someones situation with limited info!

 

:-)

Edited by emandcole

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...