Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

They will make her bankrupt for 4000 pounds, help please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Beaconsman, Your wife and yourself need to realise that owing money is not a crime. If your wife was to offer £1 a month on an outstanding debt and maintained those payments, the liklihood of a company taking her to court would be tiny.... because a court only asks for repayments to be made based on an ability to pay; not what a company wants. This is irrelevant.

 

I paid £5 a month on an ex-repo debt of 52K for 4 years without it ever gong to court. They knew there was no more money to fund it at the time and I knew they'd be piddling in the wind by trying to get what wasn't there.... so it continued until they got fed up and asked me to settle for a teeny, tiny sum. ;)

 

You're in good hands with the people on this thread.... but for God's sake hang up that phone the minute you realise it's them on the end of it. Its the only way they can get away with the bowlarks they've been telling you. It would never come to you in writing because it's cr*p, simple as that. You don't need their permission to do anything.... they are debt collectors; not bailiffs. They have no right of entry into your home, can't go for a Charging Order without a CCJ (unless your wife foolishly hands it to them on a plate) and certainly can't send your wife to prison because debtors jails haven't been around for around 100 years.

 

Please tell your wife to stop fretting.... you've now made a legal request for the CCA... and can set aside any other rubbish they've sent you on that basis... and/or other grounds if by chance they do happen to produce something.

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Go back to post 42man's post #41 and read the thread he's posted on there for guidance.... I've not been through this particular procedure personally... so you might want to wait for 42man to back online to help you with it check that you're ok with everything.

 

It will be fine... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

..they have ssaid that can go for a charging order without a ccj,

 

Yes well, they would say that... :rolleyes:... on the 'phone, no doubt. Stop talking to them on the 'phone and you won't have to listen to this kind of sh*t. The only way they can get a CO without a CCJ is if your wife signs and gives it to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Right, Also, I Am NoW GOINGTo Get InTouch With The Moderators.......

 

WHY WE ARENT FIGHTING, SIMPLE. THE DJ SAID SHE HAD SEEN 25 CASES ON MONDAY 28TH AND TUESDAY 29, OUT OF ALL THOSE, ONLY 3 WERE SET ASIDE, HER ADVICE WAS TO NEGOTIATE...AS WE WOULD LOSE.....EVIDENCE AGAINST MY WIFE FAR TOO MUCH, SHE WANTED MORE EVIDENCE FROM US THAT WE COULD PROVE AN UNENFOREABLE DEBT...

 

AS SHE POINTED OUT, IF THEY HANDT HAVE TURNED UP THEN IT WOULD HAVE BEEN SET ASIDE..SHE ADVISED US TO SETTLE..

 

If you/your wife were taken to court as a Defendant, then it's not up to you/your wife to prove an unenforceable debt.... it's up the Claimant bringing the action against you.

 

Are you now saying that you were the Claimant?

 

If so, then it would explain why you never posted up the POC... like you were asked to... :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beaconsman, there's far too much on this (and other) threads that really doesn't add up.... this is why people doubt your authenticity.

 

If your wife doesn't want to follow advice on here, then that's up to your wife. You've said that she has a friend who is a "lawyer" (I assume you mean solicitor).... If your wife prefers to get her advice from elsewhere, then it is her decision entirely.

 

You've also said that your wife earns 3 x as much as you.... yet you work in education. The assumption is that you're a Physics teacher, but as your info. continues to be vague... you could also be a lab technician.... which might make more sense.

 

The point I'm making is that on the face of it, you and your wife appear to have an income that a lot of people would be grateful for.... yet absolutely no idea about how to manage it. Please forgive me if that sounds judgemental....

 

Bottom line is.... either you want our help or you don't. If you don't, then rather than attack the advice given to you... just go away.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Would someone who is not working in the Financial Sector have a case for unfair dismissal if they lost their job because of being made Bankrupt.

 

 

Not sure on that one ODC, but as I work in the education sector myself... an unqualified teacher (Instructor) would be on approx. £17K at least... so if that's what the day job is and his wife's on 3x his salary (as he claims), then he appears to be in a far better position to sort his/his wife's problems out than most people on here.

 

;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

all very well reading about the successes, what about the ones that havent been won, like ours?..if a judge says we would lose, then we will lose....plus she wasnt arsed about the fact they had failed to coply with a cca request....

 

22 out of 25 set asides LOST! Not won, LOST! think there is a fair assumption, that yes, we have drawn a lottery with the judge and she is a bad one...

 

You wouldn't be the first to get a cack Judge, Beaconsman.... and nothing worth having in life is easy. I've fought many, many battles in my life.... and I woudn't say any of them have been particularly easy.... but I would have lost the house I'm in now if I'd gone through a solicitor years ago. I've never forgotten that, which is why I've always handled everything myself; DMPs the lot. As a result (I believe), I'm not in Debt Row any more... :)

 

Sometimes you have to keep on with the fight to see justice done and/or maintain a certain standard of living for yourself and your family. You also have to believe in yourself...

 

:)

Edited by PriorityOne
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

all very well reading about the successes, what about the ones that havent been won, like ours?..if a judge says we would lose, then we will lose....plus she wasnt arsed about the fact they had failed to coply with a cca request....

 

 

Then it sounds as if your legal argument wasn't strong enough. A courtroom is a place where aspects of law are challenged and debated, so to speak. People who go in there need to fight their corner.... which means that the arguments need to be polished to perfection.

 

When they're not, people often find themselves ripped to shreds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the OP is going to continue being defensive, and ignoring/contradicting what advice is passed his way, then what's the point of continuing this thread? Hasn't enough time been wasted on this already?

 

... because underneath it all, he might actually need some help, not have the confidence to take the system on right now and be lashing out at anyone and everyone instead. It's easier for some people to do that sometimes...

 

If he needs/wants help, then people will try and listen to him, but at the moment he's not making much sense.... so no-one can.

 

I'm not entirely sure of the story, I'll admit.... but am prepared to give him the benefit of the doubt if/when he responds to some of the questions that have been asked.

 

:)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...