Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi on the notice of disqualification it lists the 2 speed offences and marks offence withdrawn? This is for both offences and then the other 2 is the MS90s which I’m fined for and the additional costs. R
    • Hi,    It has taken a while, but I have received an email from Auxillis -  hello, we are not dealing with this claim all we do is log accident for you isnurance - the claim has been passed to your underwriter markerstudy 0344 873 8183 as they are deal with fault cliams ion behalf of adrian flux. thankyou auxillis   I have made repeated attempts to phone Markerstudy in between working from home, struggling for energy and trying to find a cheap car so that I can keep my job (community support worker). Thankfully I have a supportive team and I am being given phone calls to make but it cant last too long. I had a severe migraine over the weekend and also have quite bad whiplash in my neck and back.    I found this in my insurance policy booklet -    Protection and Recovery If the insured vehicle cannot be driven following an incident leading to a valid claim under this section, we will pay: • the cost of its protection and removal to the nearest approved repairer, competent repairer or nearest place of safety; and • the cost of re-delivery after repairs to your home address; and • the cost of storage of the insured vehicle incurred with our written consent. If the insured vehicle is damaged beyond economical repair we will arrange for it to be stored safely at premises of our choosing. You should remove your personal belongings from the insured vehicle before it is collected from you. In the event of a claim being made under the policy we have the right to remove the insured vehicle to an alternative repairer, place of safety or make our own arrangments for re-delivery at any time in order to keep the cost of the claim to a minimum     I do about 20-25000 miles a year with the work I do, I have been getting quotes and putting that I have now have one accident and no no claims bonus and the cheap quotes from similar companies to markerstudy are more than double what i paid last year at 8-900 and aviva is offering 2600 which is simply out of my price range and more than the car i am looking at.  I am starting to wonder if it is even worth going ahead with the claim as i have no one to claim from. I have had no information from any of the enquiries I have made.  I have a full tank of vpower diesel in the car in the impound, i can strip it for parts and probably make what I will be offered by the insurance payout and get the money quicker.  As I have made contact and started the process can I back out, still keep my NCB and a claim free history? Also what happens with my injuries? I don't think there is any permanent damage but my dr refused to see me and just gave me a boat load of naproxen and codeine. What happens in the future if things don't get better and I cancelled this claim? Can you claim injuries off your own insurance because the other guy ran and you cant find him? I have tried to ask these questions off markerstudy but they keep me waiting for nearly an hour then end the call.    Thank you for your time and help.  It is really appreciated.  I am quite honestly on the floor, I have been really ill, in hospital, had nearly 6 months off work and only been back full time a few weeks and now this.  The fact the company you pay large sums of money to look after you in a time of need is also behaving criminally just makes you want to give up.    
    • Thanks for the response. Am I able to send you the documents I’ve received or can you message via instant message and I’ll send these? Reece
    • Regretfully it does. Have you actually seen any papers which show what you were charged with (rather than what you were convicted of)? It is unusual not to be “dual charged” but if you were not charged with both, you are where you are. If you had been charged with both offences and providing you were the driver at the time, you could, after performing your SD, have asked the prosecutor to drop the “Fail to Provide” (FtP) charges in exchange for a guilty plea to the speeding charges (you cannot be convicted of speeding unless you plead guilty as they have no evidence you were driving). You will have difficulty defending the FtP charges. In fact, it’s worse than that – you have no chance of successfully defending them at all because the reason you did not respond to the requests is because you did not receive them and that’s entirely your fault. No it’s not correct. Six months from 18/11/23 was 18/5/24 so, unless they were originally charged, the speeding offences are now “timed out.” There is one avenue left open to you. If you perform your SD you must serve it on the court which convicted you. You will then receive a date for a hearing to have the matters heard again. Your only chance of having the matters revert to speeding (and this is only providing you were the driver at the time of those offences) is to plead Not Guilty, attend court. When you get there you can ask the prosecutor (very nicely, explaining what a pillock you know you were for failing to update your  V5C) if (s)he is prepared to raise “out of time” speeding charges, to which you will offer to plead guilty if the FtP charges are dropped.   This is strictly speaking not lawful. Charges have to be raised within six months. Some prosecutors are willing to do it, others are not. But frankly it’s the only avenue open to you. There is a risk with this. I imagine you have been fined £660 (plus surcharge and costs) for each offence. The offence attracts a fine of 1.5 week’s net income and where the court has no information about the defendant’s means a default figure of £440pw is used.  If the prosecutor is not prepared to play ball you can revise your pleas to guilty. A sympathetic court should give you the full discount (one third) for your guilty pleas in these circumstances but they may reduce the discount somewhat. The prosecution may also ask for increased costs (£90 or thereabouts is the figure for a guilty plea). So it may cost you more if you have a decent income (I’ll let you do the sums). But MS90 is an endorsement code which gives insurers a fit of the vapours. One such endorsement will see your premiums double. Two of them will see many insurers refuse to quote you at all meaning you will have to approach "specialist" (aka extortionate) brokers. So you really want to exhaust every possibility of avoiding MS90s if you can. One warning: do not pay solicitors silly money to defend you. Making an SD before a solicitor should attract just a nominal sum (perhaps a tenner). That’s all you should pay for. You have no viable defence against the FtP charges and any solicitor suggesting you have is telling you porkies. The offer to do the deal is easily done by yourself and you can save the solicitor’s fees to put towards a few taxis and increased insurance premiums if you are unsuccessful. In the happy event you find out you were "dual charged", let me know and I'll tell you how to proceed. (Seems a bit odd hoping you were charged with four driving offences rather than two, but it's a funny old world!).    
    • Just the sort of people you despise eh Jugg  You would be much happier among your mates in that room with Rayner begging for votes 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

The Shelty bites back...***WON***


Shelty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6415 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just sent the following to Mr Higley, which I've copied from several that I've seen Michael Brown suggest (thanks Michael!!);

 

"Thank you for your letter dated 25/9/2006

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest and court fees totalling £4194, which includes the daily interest.

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of full settlement of my claim.

I trust this clarifies my position.

Yours faithfully" etc etc

Will NW withdraw their offer of the part balance now?

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Shelty, I am following your thread with interest as you seem to be a little ahead of me. I have yet to recieve a letter from the esteemable Mr Higley. I have had notice that the claim is going to be defended in full, but nothing heard yet.

 

If you have recieved a partial offer, are you obliged to tell the court? Is a partial offer to settle an indication of admission?

 

MADGEXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Madge, I'm not sure if you're obliged to tell the court, although I'm sure that NW will use the offer as evidence that they are trying to be reasonable & negotiate. This is the first offer I've had, but I've seen others where offers are made before it gets to the court stage. I now expect, if my case follows the pattern, Mr Higley will withdraw the offer, Cobbets will make another slightly higher offer, then the court stuff will be issued.....they have another 16 days to file a defence.

At the outset I would have been happy just getting my charges refunded, but the interest & then the additional 8% all add up & I want the whole lot now ! Hope you're succesful with your claim Madge.

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again,

 

All I ever wanted was a £38 dd charge refunded which they refused to do! We have some great oneliners put aside for future use if and when they start talking about gestures of goodwill! They have until the 24 Oct to file their defence.

 

Good luck with your claim!

 

M

Link to post
Share on other sites

The saying "left hand doesn't know what the right hand etc" applies today ! Two lots of post;

1. Notice that Acknowledgment of service has been filed. This came from the court, dated 22nd, saying that NW has 28 days to defend the claim, & signed by Cobbetts on 21st saying they will "defend all of this claim".

So I assume that in the next 28 days that I'll get a fob off letter from Cobbetts???

 

2. Second Letter from Mr Higley dated 25th, offering me £1320 as a "gesture of goodwill and without admission or liability. Acceptance of this offer will be in full & final settlement of your claim together with an acknowledgement that our terms & conditions will continue to apply"

 

Off to look through the templates to find the next thanks but no thanks letter to Mr Higley. Does this all seem like the standard ??

 

 

Hi Shelty,

 

This is interesting as I have got the exact same response from a Stuart Higley say "I am disappointed to note that you are contemplating legal action...." blah blah. This is a response from my first letter. About to send him my second today. I will take this all the way until I get my £381 squid back!!!!!!

 

Good luck!

 

I'll let you know the standard response I get!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Been going back through cc statements aswell & got two lots £80 on NW Prem' & £128 on NW Visa.

Should I wait for the ongoing NW claim to be finished before I send letters for these two ? Also, should I issue them as two seperate claims as they're 2 accounts?

Any advice welcome as usual.

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Defence recieved , but no AQ from the court....will this get sent automatically? Notes & Request for further info read as follows;

 

Notes;

1. The request is served pursuant to CPR part 18

2. The reason(s) why this request has been served are set out in the defence which has been served by the defendant

3. You are asked to provide a response to this request in accordance with CPR part 18 by 3/11/06

4. If you are unable to provide a response by this date then you should immediately contact the defendants solicitors and tell them when you will be able to provide a response

5. In the event that you do not provide adequate response to this request by this date then the defendant can aply to the court for an order requiring you to provide the information requested or an order striking out the claim(s)

 

The Request for Info';

1. In your claim you state "Claimant is claiming the return of £xxxx taken by the defendant in charges in the last 5 years". No mention of interest at this point...should there have been?

2. Please provide the following particulars to support your claim:

2.1 In relation to each charge please identify (a) the date when the charge was charged; (b) the amount of the same & © the reason(s) for the charging of the same ok...just send copy of spread sheet? should this be the original or an up to date one to reflect the interest?

2.2 In relation to each charge, please identify the following: (a) is it the case of the claimant the same should not have been charged? (b) If yes; please explain why the claimant contends the same should not have been charged? © If no; is it the case of the claimant that the same should not have been charged in this amount? (d) If yes; Please explain why the claimant contends that the same should not have been charged in this amount and identify the sum the claimant contends should have been charged. (e) If no please state the claimants case.copy of spreadsheet covers all this doesn't it?

3. In your claim you state that "the charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforcable as they are contrary to common law"

4. Please provide the followig particulars to support your claim:

4.1 Please specify the clause(s) pursuant to which the charges were applied;

4.2 Plesae specify whether the charges applied were a breach of contract by the claimant;

4.3 Please identify in each case the particular breach of contract (by reference to the appropriate term(s) of the contract) that the charge related to. Ok, what does that mean...what do I do to respond to this point?

5. In your claim you state taht the charges are ;"invalid under the Unfair (contracts) Terms Act 1977 s4 and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 Para 8 and Sch.2(1)(e)" and "Unreasonable within the supply of Goods and services Act 1982 s.15"

6. Please specify all of the facts relied on by the Claimant in support of the contentions in Para.5 above, and in particular please identify the contractual provision (s) that the claimant alleges are invalid by reference to UCTA/The regulations. As with 4.3...how do I respond to this point?

 

OK, so that's the request for info, which I'm assuming is pretty st'd stuff? I found Martin's info on responding to the CPR 18 request as detailed below. Is this all I need to send back & does it answer all of the points raised above?

 

"At the defence stage it appears that the NatWest solicitors are asking claimants to complete a Cpr part 18.

They claim they have insufficient POC and request the claimant to send this to them.There is no requirement to do this and the letter below can be sent in response.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Claim No:

 

I Acknowledge the receipt of the defence posted on behalf of National Westminster Bank plc.

I am not prepared at this stage to answer the CPR Part 18 Request. I anticipate that the claim will be allocated to the small claims track and would not then expect to have to deal with a Part 18 request since these are specifically excluded under Part 27 unless the court specifically orders me to do so of its own initiative

Furthermore I consider that the CPR part 18 request is intimidatory and I intend to bring the intimidation to the notice of the court. However, for clarity, I confirm the charges I am claiming were applied to the following account:

Account Name:

Account number:

Sort Code:

 

Please also find enclosed a breakdown of all charges I am claiming.

Yours Faithfully"

I assume I'm getting close now....thanks for your help in advance again!

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Above letter sent today....recorded delivery of course !

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

AQ recieved, please can someone check my answers;??

Settlement postponement for a month NO

change of Location (they've already reasigned it to a Court near me) NO

Small claims Track YES

Witnesses 0

Experts report no

Hearing non availability no

Other info...(was thinking of copying this from the templates).."I am respectfully requesting that my claim be allocated to the small claims track. This issue is not a complicated one; it is an issue of fact and not of law. The issue is only whether the money levied by the Defendant in respect of its customer’s contractual breaches exceed their actual costs incurred. I am happy to pay their actual costs and I am surprised the Defendant did not counterclaim for these, because I would have paid them without argument.

However, the continuing problem is (in common with the 100s of other cases currently being brought by other bank customers) that the banks refuse to reveal the details of their penalty-charging regime. As the banks have a fiduciary duty towards their customers, they have a duty to deal straightforwardly and in utmost good faith.

Accordingly, I would respectfully ask that the court in this case, not withstanding allocation to the small claims track, order standard disclosure. I understand that it is in the courts discretion to do so. I believe this would bring a rapid end to this litigation."

should I do so ?

Fee....yes

 

Also, should I send any copy documents with the AQ, eg the refusal letter to the CPR18 request, copies of the offer I was made etc?

 

Many thanks again !! Nearly there now (I hope) !!!

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two letters from Cobbetts today;

1) "It is our clients contention that your particulars of claim did not properly particulise your claim. For example, our cleint cannot properly defend a claim where you have not given the details of each charge you claim is disproportionate and unreasonable.

The Court is bound by an overiding objective to deal with the cases justly and ensure that parties are on an equal footing. It is clearly teh case that our client could not respond to your claim where you did not provide sufficient particulars. Our client therefore objects to your allegation that the request is intimidating"

 

2) "your challenge will fail in Court, etc etc, However, as a gesture of goodwill and strictly on the basis that our client rejects any liability to you, it is willing to offer you a goodwill payment of £2100".:-)

Full & final sett't on the basis that a) you shut up & b) withdraw the claim at Court. You have 7 days, we will draw this letter to the Courts attention on the basis that this offer is fair & reasonable" etc

 

Help required please!

  1. As per previous post...how do I finalise the AQ....I've done most of it, just need help on 1 section
  2. Should I respond to the first letter or ignore it? They haven't asked for anything so I propose to ignore it
  3. Do I send the st'd "will accept this as part payment" letter in response to the second letter?
  4. Do I send a copy of my response to the Court?
  5. Do I need to take the AQ in or should I wait for them to pay up before this is due?

Thanks in advance !! Donation nearly on it's way !!!

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

  1. As per previous post...how do I finalise the AQ....I've done most of it, just need help on 1 section Standard disclosure is fine. Just include a schedule of charges
  2. Should I respond to the first letter or ignore it? They haven't asked for anything so I propose to ignore it Yes
  3. Do I send the st'd "will accept this as part payment" letter in response to the second letter? See below
  4. Do I send a copy of my response to the Court? Yes and the offer letter
  5. Do I need to take the AQ in or should I wait for them to pay up before this is due? not crucial, but if you send it back it will cost Natwest an extra £100 to settle

Thanks in advance !! Donation nearly on it's way !!!

 

Dear [named sender or Sirs]

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx

 

I respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to me all charges imposed on this account, interest, court fee and allocation fee now totalling £xxxx

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I trust this clarifies my position.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Michael, all gone off today.....the waiting continues

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

AQ taken to court today,fee paid & I was told that they would contact me within a month, once NW had submitted their AQ.

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

ha ha ha, just had a NW "investment mngr" on the phone....

"Hello Mr Shelty, I had a note in my diary to give you a call to discuss your financial situation. The last time we spoke you thought that your debts may have been reduced by now, and as such may have some additional disposable income"

(I had to laugh, yes my debts may soon be reduced, and yes I might have some more "disposable" income, but that's only after NW send me a cheque) I suggested that he should phone me in the Spring !

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

WIN WIN WIN !!!

The O/H had just left this morning, and there was a knock on the door...."what's she forgotten this time" I asked myself...no it was the Glam' post lady...."please sign for this sir" & out came a cheque from Cobblers for the Full amount + interest + fees !! £4312.44 & no conditions !

Payable to my NW a/c, but who cares !? Will wait for cheque to clear then inform the court, funny though, the cheque was dated the 1/11, and yet the letter 6/11, so they'd written the cheque before they would have known that I'd returned my AQ. Oh well, who cares......I WON !!!

Thanks to all who've helped, it's not over yet, another few claims still in the pipe line, so thanks for help in advance aswell !

Survey completed, donation to follow when all the claims are completed !:grin: :grin: :grin:

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

shelty.

 

From your thread i can see you and i were at about the same stage. can i ask when you AQ was due back to the court. I know you have now won but just wounder if the same will happen for me shortly

23/08/06 RECIEVED STATMENTS:) 25/08/06 SENT PREM LETTER

Link to post
Share on other sites

My AQ was due back on the 11th Nov, athough I took mine in on the 30th Oct....so they wrote the cheque out 2 days after I'd returned my AQ asking for st'd disclosure......your's wont be long !

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cobbetts AQ arrived this morning, and I've signed the notice of discontinuance........Thanks NW pleasure doing "business with you !":-D

M-Stanley, Marbles , Barclaycard,Cap 1, NW CC's x 3, NWest, MBNA , HSBC CC ALL WON

 

Outstanding

Halifax initial 11/10 acknowledged 19/10 LBA 25/10

LTSB initial 12/10 LBA 26/10

Barclays initial 3/10,response 9/10 LBA 17/10,MCOL 1/11, defence &AQ 10/12

Bof Ireland mort' S.A.R 16/10, initial 23/11, LBA 7/12,MCOL 23/12

NatWest home loans S.A.R sent 23/10,Initial 16/12, LBA 6/1

NatWest business a/c initial 9/11, LBA 25/11, MCOL 9/12, AQ 20/1,cheque recieved 17/2 but had to send it back !!

HSBC c/a AQ returned 17/2

HSBC bus' a/c MCOL 17/2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations Shelty.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...