Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5335 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am a housing association tenant. They adopted a zero tolerance policy some months ago.

I pay by bank transfer during the first week of every month, the problem is that as they give 2 "free weeks" a year the rent calculation is weekly rent times 50m divide by 12, which is what I pay and how they calculate their Direct debit payments.

 

The problem is that at certain times of the year I am in arrears on the 1st of the month by a few pounds, this month it was £16. this will disapear in December when we get a "free" week

 

The arrears trigger a threatening letter which I view as harassment as invariably they have had the payment by the time I get it.

During discussions with them they admitted that the same situation arises with tenants who pay by DD but they do not get the letters, Is this discrimination??

 

The arrears quoted at the end of October amounted too £16 - this is the equivalent of the rent for 8 hours and 16 minutes. there must be some guidelines somewhere concerning this. Can any one help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you describe does not amount to harassment or discrimination.

 

Agreed.

 

This is clearly frustrating for you, but I read somewhere of the arrears problem faced by social landlords - and the figures were staggering :eek:

 

Have a friendly chat with them, instead, and see if there is any way they can mark your records to stop the reminders being sent.

 

Most systems will allow this, although the landlords own procedures may not allow staff to do so. If that's the case, you are stuck.

 

If they can mark your records, but procedures don't initially allow, suggest that you'll email/call each month if there's going to be the slightest delay, just to offer them some reassurance.

 

Otherwise, accept that it's (nearly) a case of "computer says no".

 

PS. All junk post/unwanted letters here gets recycled, in that they get passed to the kids to cut up / paste / draw on the back of... have even been given boxes of (unwanted) office stationary in recent years, which kept the kids amused for ages :)

As for me, happy to help out. I am not a Landlord, but I have been in the past. I am not an Agent, but I have been in the past. I am, therefore, a has been, so always seek independent and suitably qualified advice elsewhere before relying upon whatever has been posted here :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. Yes it is very frustrating, as with so many things these days your past record counts for nothing. An interesting thing is that the staff are in the front line of many tenants complaints and are encouraging me, and others I believe to complain to their head office.

However I do console myself with the thought that it must be a very expensive exercise for them which will in many cases produce litle in the way of results but will surely damage their reputation which they have worked hard to build up

 

J

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...