Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Faulty Goods - What can I do?


stu2525uk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5338 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In April 2008 I bought a nice new, shiny set of Nicklaus High ct golf Irons from American Golf fro the grand sum of £500. They came with a 1 year manufacturers guarantee as well as another added year on top by American Golf themselves(as standard).

 

They developed rust on most of the club heads within that year so I took them back in February this year. The store sent them away to be looked at and a few days later I was given a replacement set. Now I find myself in November 9 months from being replaced and there are little rust spots returning on the head of the clubs again.

 

Now what am I supposed to do in this situation as looking around for information there seems to be a common saying that you can only reject them with in a reasonable amount of time(generally a few weeks) but surely 10 months is a reasonable time especially given that they are still guaranteed by AG. As golf clubs at that price, should really be lasting upwards fo 10 years in my opinion. I have an old cheap set bought for £100 and they are still fine even 5 years from being bought at a fraction of the price.

 

What should I do and what would I be entitled to? As there is an inherent fault in the actual product it would seem.

 

Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Were they sold as rustless? Metal does rust, it remains a fact of life. The wheels of my bike rust if I don;t take care of them. If you took no preventative action (cleaning them when wet, and ensuring exposed surfaces were protected) unless there was a specific 'no rust' claim - I don't see you succeeding in a formal complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? Because Iron rusts?

 

I've no idea what compund your clubs were made of, but unless it was stainless steel or aluminium, they will rust unless cared for. It is nothing to do with satisfactory quality, but oxidation. If my car rusts, should Ford be liable for a replacement?

 

As for others - hardly relevant unless you lay the same rounds, weather and storage. You could leave yours t rust in the garage whilsto thers have them in an airing cupboard. Unless they guaranteed the fact the irons wouldn't ruat, any replacement would be under goodwill - not a right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the Iron heads which have rusted are composed of stainless steel plasma and 455 carpenter steel used due to their non corrosive ablilites. Used also in aero planes and space shuttles.

 

455 - ASM Material Data Sheet

 

Stainless steel - Stainless steel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

And you are trying to tell me their are no defects with the Irons themselves even if I tell you they have been immaculately looked after like all my other golf equipment which I have not had problems with?

 

The stainless steel composition is 17-4 also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I'm not saying there are no defects - I'm not a metallurgist, nut having 'non corrosive' abilities is not the same as warranting them to be corrosion'free!

 

If the dealer says theres nothing they can do, and litigation is your only recourse, unless there was a non-rust statement (not simply a 'tendancy' not to) and they chose to defend - you could well lose.

 

My neighbour tells me after he completes a round and prior to putting the bag into storage, he rubs all the shafts with a cloth sprayed with WD40, and he's never have any rusting, even on his cheapest driver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am only annoyed as they were not cheap and I have not had a problem with any other pieces of my golf equipment.

 

I understand what you are saying but this year I don't think I have played on one rainy day since receiving the replacement although in the morning you still play on the dew on the grass.

 

If I am being honest I would say it is a design flaw with my limited knowledge of designing of golf eqipment. As below this is how the golf club is actually designed;

 

I think the way it is not sealed leaves water that is impossible to get to as I have even tried a hairdryer to get it out. Also weight is leant to the fact there is no problem with the Sand Wedge in either of my sets which coincidently is the only club not to have shown any rust.

 

nikirons.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...