Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
    • I have initiated the breathing space so ill wait. from re reading everything this what i understand BS gives me 60 days break from the creditors during these 60 days they may contact me and will most likely default I need to wait until after a default notice to see whether the OC will keep the debt or sell it off If kept by the OC then i should attempt a plan or pay some token payment? If sold to DCA then don't pay and after 6 years it will leave my credit report once the DN is registered with a date. DCA may start a CCJ but unlikely, if they do come back here. last question, do you know roughly how long this will all take? in terms of defaults/default notice, potential CCJ? Would you say I have 12 months plus from when the BS ends?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Reclaiming PPI from HFB Bank


designhotty
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5152 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry - the stalking wasn't that bad - I didn't need a restraining order anyway :wink:

 

I can't see any attachments though which is what we really need to work out how much they charged you for the PPI and associated insurance (which they used to call "specialty insurance").

 

It's important to note that whilst you were sold PPI, you were also sold additional insurance which would be subject to the same regulations as the PPI. HFC were fined just over £1m for failing to adhere to those regulations. Furthermore, the premiums for the additional insurances could be monthly or single premium. If they are single premium, they would be added to the loan (thus increasing your debt) and attract interest over the full term of the loan (further increasing your debt).

 

Nobody here will or should advise you on whether to keep those insurances or not. Even if someone is qualified to give advice in their day job, they shouldn't do it here (main reason is they don't know enough about your personal circumstances to make a recommendation). So that's up to you to decide, or seek independent advice from a qualified advisor.

 

However, with copies of the legal agreements, we can work out how much the premiums were and how much you were charged in interest. If you took your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service and won (which seems likely from our previous discussions), then you would also be awarded 8% simple interest from the date the policy started and maybe an amount for distress/inconvenience (usually £100-£200).

 

I am fairly certain that for a £10k loan, your PPI premium would be a lot more than £938. This might be the joint life part of it (on the legal agreement the PPI was split into the Life premium and the ASU premium as the life portion went to Hamilton Life Assurance Company Ltd and the ASU went to Hamilton Insurance Company Ltd).

 

If your Critical Illness and Accident Cover policies were single premiums, you would also have been given separate legal agreements for these.

 

As dx100uk said, HFC are talking rubbish. In fact, if they have lost that information, then they have some very serious failings in their systems and controls. It sounds to me like they are hoping you'll accept the first offer they make. If they don't believe they sold you PPI, where the hell did they get £1592.93 from and why would they offer it in the first place?

 

Forget the fact that it is near to Christmas - don't let them fob you off.

 

The 6 months that dx100uk refers to is the time limit you have to take your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service once HFC have issued a final response letter (their last word on the matter). I would doubt HFC's first offer was a final response as they operate a 2 stage complaints process, but even if you didn't respond within 6 months, this would not prejudice and legal action you could take.

 

Sorry for the wall of text - get your documents uploaded (black out any personally identifiable information) and we can let you know where you stand.

 

Scooby

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry for the delay.

 

This is what's happened:

 

You took a loan for £10,000. Of that, £8,140.13 was received by you. £1,324.87 was used to pay off existing credit. That leaves £535.00 unaccounted for. I'll come back to this in a minute.

 

The PPI premium is calculated on the full £10,000 and added to your loan. The premium was £938.13 meaning your total loan was £10,938.13.

 

Interest is then calculated on £10,938.13 over the full term of the loan.

 

One important thing to point out is that missing £535.00. I suspect this is likely to be your Critical Illness Cover policy. This is totally separate to the PPI. Critical Illness Cover normally pays out a lump sum in the event of a serious illness (certain cancers, heart attack, stroke etc). You'll need to check your policy documents to see what you're covered for.

 

Now, in order to sell you this policy, HFC should have followed the same process to sell you PPI and establish that you had a need for the policy and also to make sure it was suitable for your needs.

 

The FSA took over regulation of general insurance on 15th January 2005, so in selling this policy HFC must comply with the regulations and be able to demonstrate that they did so.

 

The documents you have posted are not your legal agreements. It is actually a Key Features document that shows you all the information about the product you are about to purchase. This is designed to give you all the information you need to know before signing on the dotted line on the real agreement.

 

When HFC sold a loan, PPI and a Critical Illness policy (as a single premium), you would get 2 legal agreements - 1 for the loan plus PPI, the other for the Critical Illness premium plus PPI. The net loan on the two agreements together in your case would add up to £10,000.

 

Now, your PPI cost was £938.13. The interest for this over the full term was £657.87 giving a total repayable of £1596.00. This doesn't take account of the PPI premium or interest on the £535.00 for the Critical Illness policy.

 

You may well be wise to either ask HFC to provide you with copies of your legal agreements (making a request under the Consumer Credit Act) or making a full data subject access request to get copies of everything they hold about you. If you have the proper legal agreements, I can tell you exactly what they charged and for what element of the loan/PPI.

 

I don't think HFC have tried to cover anything up here, but I do think they have neglected to look at your other insurances that were sold at the same time and by the same person that sold you the defective PPI policy.

 

That said, I think it's rather arrogant of HFC to say they don't accept your allegations when they were fined over £1m by the FSA for failing to treat customers fairly when selling PPI. I suspect there are legal reasons why they said that to be honest.

 

Hope this helps.

 

ps. Your letters to HFC are excellent by the way!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...