Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would suggest that you stop trying to rely on legal theory – as you understand it. Firstly, because we are dealing with practical/pragmatic situations and at a low value level where these arguments tend not to work. Secondly, because you clearly have misunderstood the assessment of quantum where there are breaches of obligations. The formula that you have cited above is the method of loss calculation in torts. In contract it is entirely different. The law of obligations generally attempts to remedy the breach. This means that in tort, damages seek to put you into the position you would have been in had the breach not occurred. In other words it returns you to your starting position – point zero. Contract damages attend put you into the position that you would have been had the breach not occurred but this is not your starting position, contract damages assume that the agreement in dispute had actually been carried out. This puts you into your final position. You sold an item for £XXX. Your expectation was that you your item would be correctly delivered and that you would be the beneficiary of £XXX. Your expectation loss is the amount that you sold the item for and that is all you are entitled to recover. If you want, you can try to sue for the larger sum – and we will help you. But if they ask for evidence of the value of the item as it was sold then I can almost guarantee that either you will be obliged to settle for the lesser sum – or else a judge will give you judgement but for the lesser sum. This will put you to the position that you would have been had there been no breach of contract. I understand from you now that when you dispatch the item you declared the retail cost to you and not your expected benefit of £XXX. To claim for the retail value in the circumstances would offend the rules relating to betterment. If you want to do it then we will help you – but don't be surprised if you take a tumble.  
    • I was caught speeding 3 times in the same week, on the same road. All times were 8-12mph higher than the limit. I was offered the course for the first offense and I now need to accept the other 2 offenses. I just want to be ready for what might come. Will I get the £100 fine and 3 points for each of them or do I face something more severe?  These are my only offenses in 8 years of driving.
    • I'll get my letter drafted this evening. Its an item I sold, which I'm also concerned about, as whilst I don't have my original purchase receipt (the best I have is my credit card statement showing a purchase from Car Audio Centre), I do unfortunately have the eBay listing where I sold it for much less. But as I said before this is now a question of compensation: true compensation would seek to put me back into the position I was in before the loss ie: that title would remain with me until my buyer has accepted this, and so compensation should be that which would be needed to replace the lost item. But in the world of instant electronic payment, it could be argued that as I had already been paid, the title to the goods had already transferred, and I was required to refund the buyer after the loss. And so, despite my declared value being the retail price - that which is needed to return me to my pre-sales position, the compensatory value should be the value I sold it for, which being a second-hand item from a private seller is lower. I still believe that I should be claiming for the item's full value, rather than how much I sold it for, as this is the same for insurance: we don't insure the value we paid, but rather the value of the item to put us back into the position we would be in if we ever needed to claim. Its for the loss adjuster to argue the toss
    • amusing that 'bad economic judgement on behalf of prior party ISN'T a major reason to wingers to move to deform yet immigration is, where record levels of such has been driven by the right wings terrible brexit and the later incompetent dog whistle 'proposals largely driven to whistle to the right wingnuts Just seems to confirm the are clueless numpties 'wetting their own shoes   Has farage bought a property in Clacton yet?   yet concern for the NHS is listed as a major issue even by those saying they are moving to deform  
    • Also, have you told us how much you paid for this vehicle? Are there any other expenses you have incurred – insurance, inspections et cetera? How far away from the dealership do you live?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unnoticed body repair


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Collected (on 12/10) a used BMW Z3 - W reg - purchased from an indepedent dealer two weeks after viewing and test driving the car. After using the car every day, I notice that the car has had some bonnet damage that has been repaired. There are other 'dints' on the bodywork from car doors, but the bonnet is a repair. The repair is difficult to see execpt under certain light conditions - twilight. The car seems to drive OK but the repair job is niggling. I'm having the car checked out for any mechanical/engine defects. Do I have any redress on the repair? It wasn't declared by the dealer and may not have been undertaken by him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for response. As usual, I'm not experienced in buying cars and the adrenalin at the time always allows for not pulling thoughts together in the way you're able to in the cold light of day.

 

As I'm an honest John, don't want to assume the worst of the dealer, but ..... They say that, "....... is a well established Family firm based in Brinscall, near Chorley, Lancashire.

 

The company was set up by ............ who have over 40 years experience in the motor trade with two of the largest motor groups in the northwest.....

 

We specialise in selling quality used vehicles, all of which have been carefully inspected prior to sale in our own purpose built workshop.

 

We offer an extensive range of finance options to suit all needs and every car comes with an RAC backed warranty.

 

Our excellent reputation is built on being able to offer the best after sales care for your car before and after delivery." The car waas described as "immaculate" in the original description.

 

They had the car before I saw it and then two weeks between me agreeing to buy and then me taking delivery. I paid by Visa.

 

I guess the crunch on them being OK or not will come after I have had the engine and mechanics checked out!! I will approach them after that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So now that you know there has been a repair, you can see it all the time.

It has devalued the car and as it wasn't mentioned, you have paid the 'immaculate' price.

 

Have a look in yellow pages for a body specialist and get a quote to repair/replace the bonnet and ask him if he can have a look for any other damage/repair, he might charge a few quid. If you don't do this now, you might regret it at some future point because you don't know exactly what you are driving, and you can bet your life that when you trade it in somewhere, they will notice it and only pay what it is worth.

 

When you are armed with some facts, beit just the bonnet or other things requiring to be done, you can then decide what you want to do when you return to the dealer in respect of repair/replace or reject.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

yea, thanks for that. I have a 320 beamer and some really good mechanics that have brought that up to great condition mechanically, so that is my next step on Thursday - see how it is under the bonnet. If it is really sound then I'll be more chilled. They also know a top body shop they say so there is that next step. I guess it all boils down to whether the dealer writes s***e and cons lots of folk or whether I'm a bit gullable. The bloke who done the deal is "on holiday" so that gives me space. As you perceptively say, I'll always know the repair is there. But there's a giggle in that if I get it 110% under the bonnet. Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update - had the car checked for mechanics - plenty of worn suspension stuff, but crucially a broken spring and a snapped hand brake cable that were in all probability there at the point of MOT!! Also had a viewing by a good body repair shop - perfection would be a replacement bonnet or a 90% perfect job for around £400 - all mechanicals would cost around £600 at an independent beamer specialist - presumably 25% more at a beamer dealer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmmmm. Have you had it HPI'd? Problem is that MOT regs are " at the time of inpection" so whilst on the balance of probabilities it would be difficuly to prove. What worries me is the fact that they have said the bonnet need replacing. This could only in my opinion mean that it's had substantial damage in the past. Now the seller must have been able to see it or the inspection is perhaps flawed. If you get my drift, it's still not tying up. If I remember correctly, BMW had problems with your colour and issues with stone chipping. Can you give details of mileage, previous owners and areas where it has been? Motoway use cars suffer from stone damage and have high mileage but low mech probs. City cars have low mileage, good paintwork but heavy on brakes and to extent suspension.

 

Might help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caveat emptor does not apply to a dealer sale The dealer MUST make you aware of any defects otherwise you can return & demand a refund. If done within 6 months of purchase you don't have to prove the fault existed before you took possession the dealer would have to prove it didn't & that the defect occurred whilst in your possession

Link to post
Share on other sites

The responses to my initial post and my second one pose some of the dilemas. However, the general din'ts through wear and tear I could cope with even though they don't match the description and the promise of the dealer's web site in terms of inspection and customer care. A repair is didfferent from wear and tear. Secondly the spring and hadnbreak failure are MOT fails as I've been advised. the wear on other mechanical parts is more than that which would be included under a description of immaculate and again under the promise of careful insection that would have revealed any of the faults. It seems to come down to misrepresentation and exploitation. I've also found advisories on the MOT and it intitially failed based on areas related to issues raised in my independent inspection. Can the dealer get away with this?

Edited by synergistic
Link to post
Share on other sites

Springs may well have passed the MoT, but be ready to go - how many miles between the test and when you noticed they needed replacing?

 

Similarly, a handbrake cable can deteriorate slowly, making apportioning blame a difficult issue, uness all parts were warranted. I have a 4 ye old Espace, ownes since new and I've only done 10k miles, and I'm the only driver. I needed 2 new springs fitted - caught by the MoT as the fracturing at the ends were visible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was my beamer mechanics who discovered the broken spring and cable as well as other very worn parts. Their view was that the spring had been broken some time as the ends were very rusty. The car had done 400 miles from me taking delivery. The car failed the MOT on 6/10 intially with the following:

 

Reason(s) for refusal to issue CertificateNearside Stop lamp not working (1.3.2a)Nearside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.3)Parking brake efficiency below requirements (3.7.A.9/10)Advisory Notice issuedNearside Front and offside Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1f)Centre Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)

 

and then it passed on the same day. The rake pads were replaced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the springs are your main concern, these are always checked as a fail point by resters, and certainly, 400 miles would be ample time for them to snap and rust - even if garaged overnight. To pass the same day in addition to the pads, the brake wire would have been retensioned and it was this that contributed to its shortened life. The balljoint would probablt habe been replaced too to get round this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But have we moved away from the issue of whether or not the car was of sufficient quality under the SoG Act in light of the descriptions of "careful examination" and "superb Z3" and "immaculate" condition? There do seem to be defects that even he MOT indicates. Bottom line, have I been subject of misrepresentation etc, I know that stuff can happen in terms of breakage on used cars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes we have moved away somewhat.

 

You have to decide, am I happy with it as it is? will I lose on resale?

 

The meaning of immaculate = without a flaw, fault, or error, but your bonnet does have a flaw.

 

What do you do, you can go back and ask about it and tailor your reply on what is said and the attitude that it is said in, or you can jump straight in and demand that something is done about it, ask for some compensation because of it's devalued condition (sighting the 'immaculate' description) or just forget about it and enjoy what you have.

 

If, on the whole, are happy with the bonnet but would like some compensation, you will get more by asking for in in goods and services than in cash which would probably be hard to determine. A service is £400/500 and I don't think you would get that amount in compensation if you did manage anything, so is always a good way to go.

 

all of which have been carefully inspected prior to sale in our own purpose built workshop.

 

The handbrake cable says otherwise to 'carefully inspected', so it would seem they are no different than any other seller who is only in it for the profit.

 

You should certainly request a refund of the bill for that. Passing the MoT on a new set of pads is very unlikely as they require bedding in, so I would say it was passed because the pads were changed and not put back on the rolling road to test them.

 

The springs are a bit more complicated, The opinion of the other garage is that they have been broken for some time because of the rust, but opinion, although probably correct, is not good enough to demand a reimbursement of the cost to replace them. Your choice is to get the parts inspected or just to live with that.

 

I'm afraid it all ends up with what you decide you want doing and how far you want to take it and how happy your are with the car.

 

In summary, I see your choices as request all faults found to be corrected citing misrepresentation, or agree a compensation package with them.

 

Initially it would be best to go see them and see what they have to say for themselves. If that doesn't go very well, then all future correspondence should be in writing so as to keep a paper trail.

 

Do you have past MoT certificates?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks conniff. That helps me affirm where I am in terms of is there a reasonable dispute - its funny how you can undermine yourself as to whether you're being over critical. I have all the past MOTs bar one but that is one of the ones that comes up on the MOT history check (motinfo.gov.uk) - that's where I also got the fail/advisory information as none of that was declared to me. I suspect that some of the advisory stuff is still there as my guys did their check in around ten minutes. I have decided I would prefer to keep the car - swapped plates to my personal one as part of sale proess, and the overall colour combinations and engne are right for me. On the other had, I do't like the idea of people trying to get one over on me, and also doing it over and over with the next punters that come along. Have started a paper trail - e-mail and recorded delivery - but giving them the opportunity to resolve issues to our mutual benefit. Have also written to previous owner to see what was discounted from her or pointed out by her when she traded in. My best position is to get some compensation - a reasonable amout and not unrealistic. I know if I get all the defects sorted the car will be pretty much spot on so that will be where I want to be. Thanks agai for your balanced views.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...