Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello All,  I’m hoping someone can help me urgently here. Firstly, I’d like to say I have read multiple other threads and have some what an idea of what I should be doing, however my case might be slightly different so coming with my own questions here.    my situation is I lived in Dubai and had a credit card and a loan, loan with HSBC and credit card with Emirates (or the other way round), I lost my job and was forced to leave the country as I was staying in the country on my companies visa.    since coming back, after a few years 2 different debt collections agencies have been approaching me (one being IDRW and the other J&P). I’ve never answered IDRWW and they constantly chase me by calling and messaging me and my employer. My current company is ok with this as I explained the situation but I’m soon to be joining a new company who definitely won’t be ok with being messaged and called.    I’m afraid to continue to ignore them as they may message and calm the new employer as they have before and I’ll lose my job.    However, it seems clear from these forums that dealing with the debt collection agencies is never a good idea. You shouldn’t agree to the amount or pay anything.    j&p caught me on my phone but I still have sent them any money or confirmed the amount they’re saying is owed, they keep pushing to pay off the “principal” amount by making monthly payments, from reading these forums it seems like if I make one of those payments (they have provided bank details for ENBD), then it’ll just be paying off interest and not actually clearing the principle debt and the bank won’t even approve receipt of payment or that it’s coming off principle.    this is my predicament as ignoring them might not be an option if they chase my new employer. Maybe there’s a way to ensure the debt collection agency don’t contact my new employer?? I don’t know? Massively appreciate peoples help here. Thanks, 
    • The clock is ticking for savings providers. They now have just a few weeks left to get their act together and start offering loyal customers a good deal.View the full article
    • Thank you dx I'll get on with it  Much appreciated  H
    • Can we have a picture of the damage. It might be a lot easier than you think to do a cosmetic repair.
    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Heres a new way to attack the problem?


KPRHERO
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so if I have one question...

 

Virgin media applied a £150.00 credit to my account without my knowledge or permission, they then charged me for it two months later and have cut me off.

 

Now as far as I am concerned they didn't ask me permission, and I didn't request the money in any kind of credit agreement, so do I really have to pay it back?

 

I'm looking at it as Virgin gave me free money which I didn't ask for, would you pay it back?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/digital-tv-services/225325-virgin-tv-saga-continues.html That is the original link....

Edited by KPRHERO
Link to post
Share on other sites

C'mon on.

 

The money was never yours, and never will be. It would have been applied to your account in good faith, and then reversed once it was found an error was made. If you didn't pay in this amount, or were due a credit of this amount by them, then the money has gone to the place it was expected to in the first place. You cannot claim 'ownership' of the credit due to an administrative error.

 

If you spent the money, then they'll take you to court for it, and you'll lose as the money can never be yours under those circumstances. Using expressions like no 'permission' is poinless, it just has no relevance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the thing, I don't have an issue with paying it back, I got my head around the situation and understood why they did what they did, but, it was when they cut my services and refused to put it back on unless I paid them before the grace period was up that got my back up.

 

I've now got to go for weeks without having any cable because they applied the credit this way, i made an offer of payment, and they refused to accept it, so that is why I want to tell them to take a running jump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don;t have an understanding of your situation, but if it helps - your services are removed automatically (without human intervention) the CSS system talks to the billing system, which in turn is connected to the customer validation processes. The time clock to disconnection starts from when the bill is issued. The days tick down and you get closer to suspension, until/unless the billing system reports a credit. This shuts down the timer, until next month.

 

As I found out, it's nothing personal.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to say after being ignored by Virgin I have sent off a final letter to warn them I will be walking away from the contract, only this time I have suggested they read thier own terms and conditions which state the following:

 

You can cancel your agreement with 30 days notice in writing on the condition that you are affected for the following reason (see J3 on the Virgin Terms and Conditions):

 

"We (Virgin) make significant changes to the services so the services you are entitled to receive in return for the charges you pay are significantly altered or reduced."

 

Game Check Mate.

 

Virgin significantly reduced my services due to a change they applied on my account. I win. Hooray for me ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah - the key word here is 'significant'. They'll have to agree that there has been a significant (and detrimental change to your costs) for a cancellation.

 

What will happen is you will seek cancellation, and stop paying. They will disagree (and probably not tell you). You then get a CRA default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An update:

 

Virgin phoned me tonight, I refered them to the clause in the contract, and the fact that I was never behind with the bill, just over thier credit amount, which was thier fault, and that although I didn't want to leave them, it was thier fault for such soddy service.

 

We went back and forth for ages and finally the guy on the end of the phone agreed that I should have been given more time to pay the bill, and said that there will be a call from him tomo morning when he had more time (it was almost the end of his shift) and he would give a final yes or no to applying a credit to my account to restore services, on the agreement I would pay the outstanding balance in full over a set agreed period of time.

 

I don't believe him, but we will see.

 

Can anyone direct me to any legal reference in regards to virgin being able to apply and take away credits on my account without my permission? I can't see anything in thier terms and conditions, and finding it through google etc is a nightmare, I can't find a thing! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no issue of 'permission' for credits to your account - simply that the account should reflect the status of your dealings with the company in an accurate manner. If there are errors, as it is their system, they can modify the system to reflect the correct status (as they see it). You have no input into this, except to complain or point out their errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...