Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

LloydsTSB Section 75 Claim


MPH2k9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5373 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sent this letter to Lloyds TSB today, seeking a full refund of a faulty PC...

 

What are the chances of a hassle free refund? Are there any recommendations or tips - Alienware UK are actually based in southern Ireland for info.

 

I am writing to request that you reimburse me the value of £2651.93 as full payment for an Alienware Area 51 X58-EU computer system that I paid for with my Lloyds TSB Mastercard no: xxx credit card to Alienware Ltd on 29.04.2009.

 

My claim is made on the grounds that the item purchased was faulty and I have been unable to resolve my complaint with the supplier and that you are jointly and severally liable for any misrepresentation or breach of contract with the above supplier under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Supplementary Information

Since purchase, this expensive system has displayed a number of faults that are detailed in the attached report. Initially, response from Alienware was to request that the system was returned to them in Ireland for repair. This would involve a turnaround time of 4 weeks minimum, so we refused this option.

 

My son, a trained IT Engineer, traced the initial fault to faulty cabling. He removed a cable clamp that was excessively tight and trapping the cable. This produced a temporary fix. He requested a new cable from Alienware, this request was ignored.

 

The next fault was failure of the solid state hard drive, which made the system unusable. This was diagnosed by Alienware, who offered to send a replacement if they could first debit my credit card with the replacement cost. We negotiated an agreement to return the faulty drive – they would check it, and if faulty return a ‘new’ drive. They did this, however, the new drive was blank, and had no system software installed, as it should have under the terms of the initial purchase agreement, to match the as ‘new condition’ of the system and allow normal operation.

 

Software was installed – the system then functioned briefly, but kept crashing at time periods of 30 minutes to 2 hours usage (please see attached report). The cause of this defect is hardware related.

 

My son, and then my wife, contacted Alienware seeking a refund for faulty goods. These requests were refused.

 

Alienware stated that they had two opportunities to rectify the defects under their goods return policies, and that they would not offer a refund. They refused to comply with Eire or UK law.

 

They refused to provide an RMA number for return of the goods.

 

They stated that if the goods were returned to them, they would not accept delivery and the goods would be returned to us by the carrier, who would then demand additional charges.

 

I have a written record of this telephone call.

 

I enclose printouts of emails to Alienware, copy of invoice, and an Expert Report comprehensively detailing the multiple system defects.

 

At present, the system is unusable, and is absolutely NOT of merchantable quality, nor is it fit for purpose.

 

I request that you place a ‘hold’ on the amount of £2651.93 paid to Alienware, as applied to my account, and l request that you make a refund of this full amount under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, in order that I can purchase a working computer system that is of merchantable quality. I cannot afford to waste this amount of money on a supposed ‘high end system’ that does not work; and would, if I was to comply with the unreasonable request made by Alienware, spend more time in their workshop than in my home.

 

For your assistance, the computer system was purchased from a link on the Dell website; Alienware being part of the Dell group of companies.

 

The system is available for collection from my home address with reasonable notice. As stated above, it is a pointless act to attempt to return the system to Alienware at this juncture, after they have explicitly stated to me that they will refuse acceptance upon delivery and immediately ‘Return To Sender’.

 

My email address is xxx my home telephone number is xxx. Please contact me if you need further details or information.

 

I look forward to a full and prompt response to this letter within 14 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cannot imagine that this bank will do anything 'hassle free'.

Section 75 has been resisted by this bank and others for many years, so do not expect an easy ride on your claim, despite the fact that the law has now been fully recognised after many years of dispute by lenders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...