Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
    • Please go back and read my message posted at 10:27 this morning @jk2054. I didn't say that I wasn't going to provide documents, only that I will upload them to an online repo that I am in control of, and that I would share links to these. You shall still be able to read and download them no different from if they were hosted here. And, the issue I have is not so much with hosting, but using an online pdf editor to create a multi-page pdf, again I have discussed this that same message.
    • Thanks ,DX, I'd forgpotton about that letter and can't remember sending a SB letter. I must have left it and they did not chase. Unclebulgia. Yes several periods of no contact. Think its time for the SB letter . 
    • well if your not going to upload documents because you are too scared of your data being stolen and someone rocking up to you we are going to struggle to help you peoples energy data breach has nothing to do with a hosting site...
    • Whilst trying to point score over Biden, Trump can't remember the name of his own doctor. Trump gets name of his doctor wrong as he challenges Biden to cognitive test | Donald Trump | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Gaffe came as 78-year-old Republican presidential candidate sought to bolster his support among Black and Latino voters in Michigan  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Default Notice Question.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6512 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I sent the letter off to Sainsbury along with a £1 postal order. This was a CCA request.

 

Yesterday I received a reply (two months later!)

 

Dear Mr Rogue,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 22nd June regarding the above account. Please accept my apologies for the delay in replying to you.

 

With regards to your request I would comment as follows:

 

Please find enclosed a copy of the original credit agreement as requested.

 

We do not retain copies of individual default noticies. This does not affect the validity of the default that we recorded on your credit reference file as being in default of the terms and conditions of agreement. In doing so we have complied with the banking Code and guidance provided by the Information Commissioners Office on the filing of the defualt notices. This was recorded when your account was transferred to our Legal Recoveries Deoartment in May 2002.

 

The account was not sold onto any other company, the final payment was received in August 2005 and I can confimm that the account is now closed.

 

I hope that this explanation finally clarifies the matter, as the default notice will not be removed until the relevant six years from the date of default.

 

 

Yours Sincerly

 

Team Manager

 

 

Is this right, they dont have to keep a copy of the default notice?

Any advice on what steps to take next, or should it just be left.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have a requirement to retain copies of all transactions and correspondence pertaining to a financial product or service under the Consumer Credit Act and Financial Services Act, in addition to their other legal requirements under the various anti-money laundering statutes. Banks sometimes don't seem to realise that a bank ledger doesn't just include the statements - that's why they also have to microfiche cheques and other financial instruments (that have been transacted on the account) for six years. However, contracts that last longer than six years have to be kept accordingly, e.g. mortgage papers, etc.

 

If they can't come up with a copy, then technically, they haven't served one.... if they haven't served one, then there's no default...if there's no default, then no lawful right exists for them to register a default marker on your credit file. Under the "relevancy of data" litmus test in the Data Protection Act, there is no relevancy for this default on your account, and then you can escalate the argument to "incorrect data" being held, which they have a duty to correct upon you servig them with a "data subject notice".

 

I'd serve them with a Statutory notice to remove the marker. That then gives them 21 days in whch to write back conforming to your request, or showing reasonable grounds why they won't conform to your request. They have to back up their argument with actual documents, or you can go staright to the County Court, and file a claim asking the Court to Order them to remove it. they are then going to look right prats if they suddenly produce a copy during the Allocation stage.

 

Also, if Sainsburys have lost the default notice, have they also lost the original signed agreement? If they can't look after something more recent, is there a chance that they also don't have your original contract.

 

Ask them for the signed contract. Again, if they can't provide it, then no contract exists. How can they go to a Court and provide a copy to prove you had an agreement, if they've lost it? let alone, start trawling through the Ts&Cs that they claimed you signed.

 

Also, this allows you to kick them either way as, in the longer term (if you did take the matter to Court), you could show a complete lack of care (fiduciary duty) in the administration of your account, and an attitude to record keeping that is contrary to the FSA requirements.

 

However, if they do have the contract, then they are going to look very big ars*s to have lost something more recent (the default notice), yet do still have the original contract, as it follows by logical argument that more recent documents should also be available if older ones are still retained.

 

Either way, don't let them fob you off with a load of claptrap about "no requirement", as this is utter nonsense, and sounds like some Neanderthal call-centre amoeba-like letter-writing Muppet, has just chosen the best looking letter from the template menu, and tried that one on you.

 

BTW, the additional bulls**t about the Banking Code not requiring them to retain anything is a big red herring. The Banking Code is a voluntary code, NOT a legal requirement like the CCA or Data Protection Act or the Financial Services Act. However, saying that, turn the Code around on them by quoting Section 2 of said code:

Our Key Commitments to you:

 

 

"We will treat all your personal information as private and confidential, and operate secure and reliable banking and payment systems."

 

 

 

I don't think anyone will agree with them that "losing" or not retaining vital transaction and agreement documents pertaining to important considerations about your account would be considered "secure and reliable".

 

"Banking systems" refers not only to the actual ledger computers that store your account transactions, but also all other systems (be they manual or otherwise) that form part of the running, administration and management of your account.

 

Go get them!

  • Confused 1

I'm often a sarcastic SOB and speak my mind (and I don't do PC at all), but I have a laugh as I go. I won't be intimidated, and I don't take prisoners... so live with it, or go get yourself a humour implant :p

 

Copy of Law book from Amazon…£19.95, Refund Request stamp...32p, LBA stamp...also 32p, Court fees...£750.00,

The look on the bank's barrister's face, when they lost the '£25k Mother-of-all unfair charges' cases...(plus his £8k+ of costs)... Priceless!

 

The legal bit: These are my opinions and own view of legislation and process. I accept no liability whatsoever for any outcome as a result of anyone invoking any or all of the advice given - clarify your own personal stuation with an insured legal professional.

Saying that, I've used these methods against many of these corporate crooks:evil: and won hands down!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops, just seen it in your sig.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...