Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry but first of all you are still referring to your six-month right to reject – but you didn't assert your right within six months so this is not relevant. The situation is that you cannot reject the vehicle unless it is a write off all you have been deprived of the use of it for a significant period of time so that it can be said that you have been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of the contract. By my understanding that is not the case here. Your complaint must be that they are in breach of contract because the vehicle is not satisfactory quality. Clearly because of the way the windscreen was fitted it was not satisfactory quality when it was purchased and it has not remained in satisfactory condition for a reasonable period of time – witness the leakage and the corrosion in the car. On this basis you are holding them responsible for the cost of repairs which are £XXX and any ancillary costs reasonably incurred as a result of their breach of contract. You are currently without the car and this is not a situation which can continue. You are enclosing the evidence plus quotations for repair and you want that by the end of the week you want them to agree to the repairs. Broadly that. Please post a draft as soon as possible. You don't want to hang around on this
    • Hello folks  Got a letter from overdales the day after I submitted my defence this contains a copy of credit card agreement and a letter stating the account has been sold to lowell. H
    • Seen a number of videos online of interviews with people in town centres around the UK. Those that say they will vote Reform can accurately be described as 'Gammon Faced'. So frustrated with life in 2024 and yearning to switch the clock back many decades, they don't really care about the policies of Reform. What appears to appeal to them about Reform is an old fashioned nostalgic outlook, of trying to get the country back to how it was a very long time ago. Yes much of this is about immigration, but it is also about many other issues such as Equalities legislation, Human Rights etc, which they believe have gone too far. For the above reasons, I don't think many who are looking to vote Reform, will switch their votes back to other parties they have voted for before. From what I have seen in polling, 70% were previously Tory and about 30% Labour. The Tories under Sunak can no longer appeal to those who now back Reform. For example, I doubt any Tory Government would support leaving ECHR, because that would most likely be opposed by the majority in the UK. And many Tory MP's would not support leaving ECHR and the House of Lords would block anyway ignoring any conventions to give way to The Commons. A combination of Brexit, Reform lead by Farage and the average age of this voter demographic is quite likely to lead to the extinction of The Conservative party. What may happen after this election is that the right of politics splits into new groups. Some Tory MP's are likely to jump ship and join Reform. And others will try to relaunch the Conservative brand as a centre right modern party. This could possibly lead to the Lib Dems becoming main opposition party at some point. The outcome of this election could well significantly change UK politics forever. And it is not just about the future of the Tories, Labour with a huge majority may find it difficult to keep some on the left happy with Government progress on tackling some issues. So we may see a fracture within Labour support and new parties formed.  
    • Desperation. They must think people have forgotten what Johnson was like as PM. Tories turn to Boris to combat Farage threat WWW.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK Former PM signs letters to wavering voters amid warning Labour could be in power for a generation if support goes to Reform  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

IQOR was Legal & Trade - BOS loan harrassment...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I took out a £6k loan with BOS back in 2001, went travelling and missede a few payments. Came home the buggars caught up with me and passed the debt to DLC (Direct Legal and collections) in 2002 who somehow managed to pass the debt to Legal & Trade in 2006 and then changed name or I was told they changed name to IQOR who are now harrassing me for it.

 

I stupidly started paying Legal & Trade £40 a month back in 2006 and then upped it to £60 a month when they started harrassing me to pay more.

 

I have since wised up and wished I hadnt paid any of it to the DCC at all...but I moved house recently and went to collect some old mail from the old address yesterday and found 8 letters from IQOR in the space of 4 months.

 

One of them is a Notice of Potential legal action telling me the client is now demanding full payment (I forgot to add this was due to me being late with one months payment back in May). The missed payment was made late a week later so I am now back up to date with the payments but they are still sending me letters:

 

1) Demanding I pay in full on the instruction of the client

2) Demanding me to pay more each month as I am no longer paying enough

3) Demanding me to contact them to discuss the issue

 

So I called them this morning (witheld my number) and questioned why they are demanding full payment, they told me it was Bank of Scotland demanding it as they still own the debt. So I called BOS and they told me they do not own the debt it was sold to Blair Oliver back in 2002.

 

So where do I stand now....

 

Do I need to keep paying them, should I ask for something in writing, how do I find out who owns the debt etc....

 

Can I stop paying them also??

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do Blair Oliver & Scott actually BUY debts? I understood they just acted on behalf of Hbos etc (although they are of course genetically linked as the registrant of the Blair OS website is..HBOS :rolleyes:

How can the same company sell a debt to itself?

They do like to confuse people weedusmaximus.. as 42man says send for the agreement, and maybe Subject Access Request BOS at some stage so you know exactly where you stand with charges, selloff etc

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all thanks for the replies...well, this is the confusing thing! I just called back to speak to IQOR to get the address to send my SAR letter to and was told there isnt an address for that as they would not entertain my SAR.

 

I questioned this and she told me I would need to send it to BOS - but I was under the understanding that it should be IQOR who provide me with the SAR details as they are the ones im paying, they are the ones harrasssing me and they are the ones BOS have confirmed now own the debt??

 

Does anyone own a debt or is it still BOS as when I called BOS today they said its Blair Oliver Scott????

 

Grrr I am being passed all over the place?!?! How do I find out who owns it??

Link to post
Share on other sites

STop paying it as you dont know what from where, and whom ever contacts you tell them that untill you can sort out who owes the debt and who you have to pay you are not paying a penny. They will threaten you with court action. Just say to them that you will see them in court that is what I tell them. I had a debt with halifax via BLair scott oliver, i'm going to be hitting them with charges.

 

Take a deep breath one step at a time and dont worry about tomorrow.

 

Stop calling people have things in writing so you can build up evedience.

Clear up your confussion. then start making arrangements

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again :)

They try and confuse you on purpose.

To clarify..you need to send a Consumer Credit Agreement Request to whoever is chasing you for the money NOW.

To throw light on the sale of the debt and any charges etc on the account, you need to send a Subject Access Request to the original company, ie Bank of Scotland. Bad new is this costs £10.

Send them recorded delivery and don't sign your name..just print it.

Elsa x

 

PS DON'T TALK TO THEM ON THE PHONE!!! Everything must be in writing from now on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update - I forgot to mention when speakng to the manager at IQOR she advised me I could send the SAR to them but she would need to obtain the Credit agreement from BOS as they are not legally allowed to keep a copy on their files?

 

Surely if they are the ones I am paying and they are the ones chasing me for the money then they should have a copy of my credit agreement?

 

Do I even need to keep paying them if they dont have this?

 

I advised her I would not be paying whilst the SAR is being processed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll only THREATEN court action that's usually just hot air....they won't, in most cases follow it through. To do that they need a signed credit agreement. Let's wait and see if they've got one :D

In the meantime, once 12 (+ 2 working days) are up from sending the CCA Request, you can legally withhold payment until they complete the request.

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...