Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ryan Air


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5400 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got reverse thrust problems last month. :D

 

Better safe than sorry.

 

Article 6

Delay

1. When an operating air carrier reasonably expects a flight to be delayed beyond its scheduled time of departure:

(a) for two hours or more in the case of flights of 1500 kilometres or less; or

(b) for three hours or more in the case of all intra-Community flights of more than 1500 kilometres and of all other flights between 1500 and 3500 kilometres; or

© for four hours or more in the case of all flights not falling under (a) or (b),

passengers shall be offered by the operating air carrier:

(i) the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(a) and 9(2); and

(ii) when the reasonably expected time of departure is at least the day after the time of departure previously announced, the assistance specified in Article 9(1)(b) and 9(1)©; and

(iii) when the delay is at least five hours, the assistance specified in Article 8(1)(a).

2. In any event, the assistance shall be offered within the time limits set out above with respect to each distance bracket.

 

The other bits are here:

 

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/passenger_rights/doc/2008/q_and_a_en.pdf

 

Keep all receipts. If you are refused any, kick off with the airport manager. Hope the internet connection isn't costing much. :D

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why I made mention of receipts. Ryanair, I feel, work on the notion that they will only comply under articles 6 & 9 if you bother to go to the trouble of writing in. They will then (only with proof) fulfil their obligations.

 

Your reply will be generic, but might ask you to send in proof of any costs incurred. They know this method is cheaper than simply complying with UK-trumping EU law.

 

The phone call/fax allowance is seldom achieved and certainly not with Ryanair!

 

I am stunned that you were handed out your rights, even if it was their version, O'Leary will go nuts if he finds out!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ryanair's service is fine in my experience, and amazing since I pay them pratically nothing. When things go wrong...it obviously shows - it's not in their model.

 

Difficult as possible is correct and boy will they attempt to shaft you! It was only a delay in the grand scheme of things - but do follow through your limited rights, even just out of principle!

 

They of course know that the address in Dublin is only useful to ROI nationals. Gits!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's slimmed down. Though it does cover your delay.

 

This stuff always reminds me of the scene from the flick 'True Romance' where Christopher Walken does the bit about lies, the man has 18 and the woman 21 or something.

 

What they are doing is telling you everything, yet telling you nothing!

 

Anyway, it's always not their fault and it's designed to sub-consciously make people think that way. Eejits. Their (probably lawful) interpretation anyway.

 

The question is, did you buy extra drinks/food, need to communicate etc, and do you have proof?. (internet costs likely not included in the regs)

 

Ryanair twaddle...LOL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they don't have to pay. Maybe I am missing the point, but this is no cancellation; it's a mere delay.

 

I don't think you'll have any luck with the parking either, sorry.

 

Article 8.1(a) is hardly transparent, for me, even if you can state the delay was 5 hours or more, and since you got the return flight (eventually) it wouldn't apply.

 

Delay offers hardly any protection, and I agree with that. :|

 

That's all before the airlines interpretation of it. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not an easy answer, it's pratically near impossible. :(

 

They love it.

 

Letters (prelim and LBA to head ofice in Eire - paper trail)

 

Litigation wise, your guess is as good as mine (and I know how truely awful they are!)

 

Satelite 3, Stansted would be your starting point, but they may tell the Court that you have served the cleaners. They appear to lie - but it seems to be allowed! The CAA are a bunch of boobs anyway, just like the CSA (Oh, and the rest of them - I only like the ASA!)

 

They have been taken to task over the wheelchair fiasco - but gawd knows how they did it. (I'd love to know)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...