Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclaycards response to my SAR!


Zorro01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

As per the screen shots with codes... did they send a list of codes and their meanings, if not they are in breach of the SAR and you should complain to the ICO.

 

As per the CCA, they will claim this and I've seen where the ICO has basically just turned a blind eye and suggested a s78 request to obtain it, of course we all know Barclays dont respond to s78 with anything other than terms and conditions.

 

See this for a proper s78 response and what it should be.. Enron quoted it on another thread so I'm just spreading it around :-Dhttp://www.creditlaw.co.uk/Documents/true%20copies.pdf

 

Other option to get the agreement is CPR31.16 as per this thread, although this will involve a court hearing though. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/173201-why-you-shouldnt-use.html

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BC have managed to send me all my statements now and they have told me they will send me my CCA / application form.

There are loads of charges on the account some of which are over limit charges. Now here is the problem that I have. On a several occassions I went over my limit when BC had taken payment for card protection / PPI which has I have mentioned in previous posts was something I wasn't even aware that I had. What should I do as they have charged interest on the over limit charge even though it was there own COMPULSARY PPI that put me in that position.

I plan to reclaim the charges but I am totally unsure as to my rights regarding the interest levied against me at the times mentioned above. Any ideas on what to do about this???

 

The CCA should show you if you applied for PPI (but only if they actually send it). If they dont send it you can try requesting it as you think you were missold or didnt ask for PPI.

 

You should claim back all overlimit and late charges and claim the interest back, if you claim the s69 stat interest they'll usually pay it no problem without court, if you want contractual interest which is what they actually charge you on the amounts, you'll more than likely have to instigate court proceedings

 

Have you looked at the charges spreadsheet in the templates library, you'll need to input the amount of charges in there and it'll work out the interest for you.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Please also bere in mind that up until 20 days ago BC denied I had ever even had this card protection?; they said when I first started out looking into this " you have never had card protection mr zorro so we cannot help you with your enquiry"

 

Did they give you this in writing at all?

 

Are you sure you didnt apply fully online, all it takes is a tick in a box to count as your signature?

 

See this posting as to what counts as a confirmed binding online agreement. HERE (the MBNA online application almost at the end of the post)

 

Hopefully not and Bcard have cocked up big time here :-D

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi the shadow,

Would it just be a tick box on it's own or would it be with the prescribed terms and other information???

 

at the time of application if you did apply online it would be after the display of the key financial information (prescribed terms).

 

The tickbox became accepted as a signature in December 2004. What date are Barclays claiming the account was opened... in 2004 or in 2006 now?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is going to be real tough I feel to argue this in a court though I feel so would you recommend that I just go after the charges etc including PPI like I origionally planned or should I fight this one out giving all the facts I have stated in this post including forged documents and numerous incorrect info relating to me?

You can see my predicament - Its a tricky one this????

 

If this ever got to court then they would have to produce something showing your signature to the agreement, yes this can just be a tick in a box but it must still be set out correct and they will need to show that the prescribed terms were also displayed prior to you accepting.

 

If they sold it over the telephone and havent got a signature either digital or by hand then hard luck Barclaycard in my humble opinion.

 

You could attempt to get the PPI and charges back against the balance of this account. If the PPI "flag" on there database shows it was selected they'll argue against it but if you ask for proof you requested it? a transcript or recording of the phone call would be priceless as it potentially could show as above that you never signed anything as well as the fact you said no to PPI.

 

Did you ask for copies of recordings in a SAR? If they didnt provide it write asking why and threatening a complaint to the ICO if they dont provide it, would get you confirmation of whether they kept the recording or not also.

 

S.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

i asked for the recordings as part of my sar but they failed to produce them. Any ideas on a letter to give them a nudge in the right direction and forward them to me??

 

Hmm personally I'd write back in a non-template letter and if you've got it the rough date of the call.

 

Something along the lines of...

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I am in receipt of my Subject Access Request from yourselves dated xx/xx/xxxx. Unfortunately the request has not been complied with fully in accordance with the Data Protection Act. In my letter dated xx/xx/xxxx I specifically asked for recordings or transcripts of taped recordings to be provided. One such conversation I have had with your customer advisors was on xx/xx/xxxx. To fully comply with this subject Access request I expect you to either provide this recording, a transcript of said recording or confirmation in writing that this recording is no longer held by yourselves.

 

Yours

 

xxxx

S. Edited by the_shadow
tweaked the letter
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Thanks S

I am so ready for taking them to court. I will look into it.

Also I would like to know how to go about getting a court order to get HFC bank to send me my SAR. see here--> http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hfc-household/209351-wheres-my-sar-hfc.html

Do you have any knowledge of how to kick start this. I don't know where to begin and you have been around the forum much longer than I have and I could really do with some advice on this.

 

Responded on that thread.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...