Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

when did egg start using Citigroup Centre address on CCAs?


cj10
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just curious as to when egg started using the Citigroup Centre, Canada Square address on their CCAs?

 

I ask because I have assumed it was sometime after their takeover by Citigroup in 2007. If so, my agreement has been, how shall I say, re-constructed using the latest version.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I would love to see a definite answer to this question. Or at least some suggestion how to find out.

 

If it turns out that they did not use it in Oct 2005 than this effectively would mean that credit agreements they have on website are fake. In my account on egg website they have credit agreement which is dated Oct 2005 and it starts with:

 

"This is a credit card agreement between Egg Banking plc of Citigroup Centre, Canada Square, London E14 5LB and you."

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

according to archive.org, at least until Feb 26, 2007 Egg was not at Citigroup Centre, Canada Square. This actually coincides with timing of Egg acquisition by Citygroup and looks quite plausible.

 

Therefore, IMHO, Egg represents on their website that some customers signed their agreement which is a falsification because until Feb 26, 2007 this agreement could not have Canada Square address. Given that they have falsified first sentence of this supposedly electronically signed agreement, on balance of probabilities rest of this supposedly electronically signed agreements is falsified as well.

 

But I am a layman, we need legal eagles to have a look into this.

Edited by Readalot
spelling

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great research Readalot!! Now I have done a screen dump for my files, it should be easy to prove this in court!!

 

Thanks, now if needed we could use each other as witnesses if required. Moreover, I could introduce some high profile expert witnesses if needed. Qustion is: will it help? It seems nowadays banks can get away with a murder, and perhaps nobody will be too much excited about a trivial fraud. ;)

 

On the other hand, imagine, some high court judge (hypoteticaly speaking) rules that since it is proven that Egg falsified electronic signature, all their electronic CCA are unenforceable... I should stop daydreaming now.

Edited by Readalot

--------------------------------------------------

Yorkshire Bank ~1200£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~350£ of charges reclaimed many moons ago, settled out of court

HSBC ~4000£ flexiloan CCA request sent May 2009, 'sorry, we do not have your CCA' letter received June 2009, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC ~9000£ CC CCA request sent May 2009, no response, AccountInDispute letter sent.

HSBC - preliminary letter for about 300£ of unfair charges plus interest sent May 2009, LBA sent June 2009, N1 POC and Schedule of charges submitted July 2009

Egg - CCA, SAR, "no more calls" letter, DMP offer sent July 2009. Got a DN from Egg - wont say a word on this one until court papers are received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the other hand, imagine, some high court judge (hypoteticaly speaking) rules that since it is proven that Egg falsified electronic signature, all their electronic CCA are unenforceable... I should stop daydreaming now.

 

:D Now that is worth hoping for!!:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D Now that is worth hoping for!!:lol:

 

Citi group did not buy egg until Feb 2007, so the document is a forgery.

 

When you do a CCA, they are supposed to send a true copy ot the original, which obviously is not what you have there.

 

I have a slightly different situation in that I have a non compliant CCA for a different reason.

 

My Lawyer advised this, but you may want to proceed differently given that you have a forgery. he told me not to write or say anything. That way, if they do eventually go to court, which is there only possible grounds to claim back money, you can simply say that the agreement is unenforcable.

 

The problem is that most people feel they have to write back and that conveys the image that you want to keep talking or that they say jump and you jump.

 

After i sent the non compliance letter, they have gone very quiet indeed, so I am not wasting time writing to an organisation that tries to chase money on an unenforcebale debt. In asking for money, they are acting unlawfully, so let them get on with it. Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves!

 

And remember you saw it first here......unenforecable CCAs are the next big miselling/bankcharges/penions/PPi/etc scandal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be scanning the agreement tonight at work and then I'll send it to my solicitor , we might be lucky and get some opinion back from them sometime next week as she said she'd have to discuss it with one of the partners after she receives it from me. I'll let you know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will be interested to hear the outcome - I have had the same - an agreement from 2005 with Citigroup as the address ... I will watch with interest. We were just about to start making a deal with their DCA, but may just hold fire a little now ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...