Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lost Excess on Non Fault Accident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone, this is only the 2nd time i have needed advice from CAG and again this time its a Car Insurance firm trying to take my hard earned !!

 

Can you all shed some light on this issue for me :confused:

 

Fully comprehensive car insurance with Post Office.

 

My wife picked up our son from school one afternoon and on the way back coming through our village she had to pull over to allow a lorry coming the opposite way to pass some parked cars. After the lorry passedand before she could pull off a landrover reversed out of an opening onto the main road and into the side of the car. He apologised and said he had been watching the lorry and hadn't seen her and admitted fully liability. Insurance details changed hands and all was good main point no one was hurt.

 

Car was collected and repaired and returned and we had to pay £250 excess upon return of the car to the repairers.

 

When we contacted the insurance regarding getting our excess back we were informed that because the insurance policy did not have motor legal protection that we cannot claim the excess back. I asked was there a problem with the 3rd party accepting liability and they said "no" i asked had they reclaimed the cost of repair from the 3rd party and they said "yes" and so i asked why were we getting penalised for an accident that was not our fault and was told that its because we didnt have leagal protection. by this time i was starting to get a little irate and asked why they had reclaimed all of the damage cost from the 3rd Party and also £250 from us and was told that it was because we didnt have legal protection and there was nothing else they could do.

 

So what can i do ? anyone have any suggestions ?

 

Many thanks in advance Higsta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think this is correct but I will stand to be corrected - generally the cost would be recovered from the at fault insurers regardless of motor legal protection. I thought this was to be able to claim damages such as injuries arising etc?

 

Who is the insurer??

Link to post
Share on other sites

im looking at the policy now and i assume its provident but not sure, it states at the bottom of the policy ,

 

Issued by BISL Limited on behalf of Provident Insurance Plc

 

Yes i also thought leagal protection was cover if there was disputed liability and injuries etc where the case ends up in court or in need of solicitors etc.

 

I cant believe that i have to pay £250 for an accident that has been admitted from the outset by the 3rd party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would question this - put a complaint in writing aksing them for a full written explanation as to why they are charging you excess on a non-fault claim.

 

Have a look what it says in the T&C's - thats beyond ridiculous

Link to post
Share on other sites

What your insurers are saying is quite correct, you don't have legal protection so THEY will not get your excess back, you have to do it personally.

 

Any excess (or other unisured loss ie hire car, personal injury) etc is always recovered from the person responsible for the accident (or more correctly from their insurers), if you have legal protection then you have paid for someone else to do this on your behalf, if you don't have legal protection then recovering your excess is beyond what you have agreed with them to do for you.

 

You now need to write to the other party (or their insurers if you know who they are) and claim your excess back yourself

 

Just as an aside an excess has nothing to do with liability, it is paid by the policyholder and claimed back by the policyholder if they are not to blame (and can find the person who was to blame).

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok thanks for that will send a letter to the 3rd party insurers and ask for the £250 back .

 

Im thinking that this is not going to be an easy process so here goes phone calls and letters for a few months i guess :(

 

Its annoying as we always have legal protection but this is my wifes car and she sorted the insurance out herself for the last renewal and was chuffed that she got it quite cheaper :roll:.

 

anyway thanks for the advice.

 

regards higsta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it should be dead easy,

 

Send a letter (recorded) to the other driver enclosing a copy of your receipt for the excess and ask him to forward it to his insurer (if you already know the insurer ans have a claim reference, then write direct to them)

Point out that the insurer has already admitted full liability by settling with your insurer and ask for reimbursement of your excess within 14 days.

 

A cheque will follow shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to confirm Mossy and Pat, an TP insurer that has admitted liability will usually agree to pay uninsured losses without hassle. It's in their interest to do so as it lessens costs in terms of them being claimed through some ambulance chaser.

 

Even if not offered, a letter saying you have paid your excess (proof may be required) will normally result in a cheque for that amount. Whatever you do don't be tempted to go to an accident management company (after the loss insurer). You can do exactly what they do with no cost or hassle.

 

Completely superfluous as two people have already said ithe above, but I'm drunk again and desparatelt trying to sober up because I have a job interview tomorrow morning.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Completely superfluous as two people have already said ithe above, but I'm drunk again and desparatelt trying to sober up because I have a job interview tomorrow morning.....

 

Best of luck Gyzmo, hope you get it

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Higsta, did the situation resolve itself? I'm now in a similar situation but have stupidly used the moneyclaim website to try and recover the excess from my insurers rather than the third party's. It would be good to know if the third party's insurers paid up. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...